C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Corvette profitability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 5, 2015 | 03:42 PM
  #1  
kdm123's Avatar
kdm123
Thread Starter
Pro
10 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 694
Likes: 102
From: CA
Default Corvette profitability

Im curious about how profitable the Vette currently is for GM. Historically has the Vette always been profitable? From what I understand, the C3 and C4 were, but how about the c5 and C6?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2015 | 04:00 PM
  #2  
jcp911s's Avatar
jcp911s
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,598
Likes: 1,593
Default

My guess is even the "new" GM does not build cars to lose money.

Porsche makes high-performance sportscars and is VERY profitable... even though most of these profits come from SUVs... but so do Chevy's.

"Cost" is a tricky concept... for example, the engines and mag shocks from Corvette are used in Camaros and Caddys... the A8 is used across all product lines...so who eats the development costs... ?

At 30-40,000 units the Corvette is hardly a "low-production" car by world standards... and a lot of these cars are loaded with option$$$

Yes, GM is making a profit on every Corvette it sells
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2015 | 04:39 PM
  #3  
JerryU's Avatar
JerryU
E-Ray, 3LZ, ZER, LIFT
Supporting Lifetime Gold
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 34,992
Likes: 12,385
From: NE South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by jcp911s
My guess is even the "new" GM does not build cars to lose money.

Porsche makes high-performance sportscars and is VERY profitable... even though most of these profits come from SUVs... but so do Chevy's.

"Cost" is a tricky concept... for example, the engines and mag shocks from Corvette are used in Camaros and Caddys... the A8 is used across all product lines...so who eats the development costs... ?

At 30-40,000 units the Corvette is hardly a "low-production" car by world standards... and a lot of these cars are loaded with option$$$

Yes, GM is making a profit on every Corvette it sells
Now, but probably not in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 they only sold 12,000 to 13,000/yr. Even Tadge said in an interview when the C7 was introduced they needed to sell significantly more than in the prior few years or the Corvette would be in trouble.
I'm always amazed when you look at production stats that '76 tru '79 were peak sales years at 45 to 53,000/yr. Those were terrible HP years with the advent of new pollution controls, air pumps etc. Max hp was 225!

Last edited by JerryU; Jun 5, 2015 at 04:43 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2015 | 05:19 PM
  #4  
kdm123's Avatar
kdm123
Thread Starter
Pro
10 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 694
Likes: 102
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by JerryU
Now, but probably not in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 they only sold 12,000 to 13,000/yr. Even Tadge said in an interview when the C7 was introduced they needed to sell significantly more than in the prior few years or the Corvette would be in trouble.
I'm always amazed when you look at production stats that '76 tru '79 were peak sales years at 45 to 53,000/yr. Those were terrible HP years with the advent of new pollution controls, air pumps etc. Max hp was 225!
Yeah, exactly. The worst Vette was also the best selling. In the long run that really hurt the Vette image though
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2015 | 12:48 AM
  #5  
Vetteman Jack's Avatar
Vetteman Jack
Administrator
Supporting Lifetime
Veteran: Navy
St. Jude 20 Year Donor
25 Year Member
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 368,358
Likes: 24,782
From: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03 thru '26
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran
Default

I would imagine that the bean counters at GM would kill the car if it didn't show a profit for the company.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2015 | 02:18 AM
  #6  
NASTYC7's Avatar
NASTYC7
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 436
Default

Originally Posted by JerryU
Now, but probably not in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 they only sold 12,000 to 13,000/yr. Even Tadge said in an interview when the C7 was introduced they needed to sell significantly more than in the prior few years or the Corvette would be in trouble.
I'm always amazed when you look at production stats that '76 tru '79 were peak sales years at 45 to 53,000/yr. Those were terrible HP years with the advent of new pollution controls, air pumps etc. Max hp was 225!


They ran the C6 line too long IMO. 4-5 yrs should be max for a body line in todays "Gotta have it" mentality. If they run the C7 for 8 years sales will drop the same. Most people could not tell you the difference between a 05vs13 model.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2015 | 07:28 AM
  #7  
sanantguy's Avatar
sanantguy
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 755
Likes: 19
From: San Antonio TX
Default

cars that don't make money for the manufacturer either directly or indirectly............................st op getting sold
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2015 | 07:59 AM
  #8  
Corgidog1's Avatar
Corgidog1
Le Mans Master
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,442
Likes: 2,535
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by JerryU
Now, but probably not in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 they only sold 12,000 to 13,000/yr. Even Tadge said in an interview when the C7 was introduced they needed to sell significantly more than in the prior few years or the Corvette would be in trouble.
I'm always amazed when you look at production stats that '76 tru '79 were peak sales years at 45 to 53,000/yr. Those were terrible HP years with the advent of new pollution controls, air pumps etc. Max hp was 225!
Back then I bought a 77 Firebird with the 305 V8 which only had 145 hp and had regretted not getting the 4 barrel carb engine which had a whopping 170 hp. At that time 225 seems huge in relation to what was available and I had considered the vette as unobtainable with my limited resources. Now 225 hp is nothing.

Last edited by Corgidog1; Jun 6, 2015 at 08:01 AM.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jun 6, 2015 | 08:01 AM
  #9  
RussM05's Avatar
RussM05
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 1,029
From: Thomas Texas
Default

Ex-GM Vice President, Bob Lutz, wrote a book titled "Car Guys versus Bean Counters" a few years ago. There was a review of that book in one of the major car magazines and I wrote a email to the editor's stating that blaming the bean counters for the failure of GM was like saying the Yankees didn't win the World Series because of the scorekeepers. My letter was awarded the letter of the month.

I have witnessed engineers not taking into consideration or ignore the cost of a part or system. Many times Project creep happens and costs go up dramatically. When it comes time to make the critical decisions, they are forced to look at the cost and make a decision but blame the accountants who are simply reporting the facts. Scape goat.

Good Engineering involves establishing a reasonable budget then making sure that the product will be cost effectively for the targeted revenue.

Some engineers don't know or take into consideration the profitability of a product and back themselves into a corner. When it comes time to make the critical decisions, they have to look at the cost and make a decision what to do. An important decision by the head of engineering involves making sure that the car will be profitable.

Last edited by RussM05; Jun 6, 2015 at 08:03 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2015 | 09:03 AM
  #10  
LIStingray's Avatar
LIStingray
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 466
From: Long Island New York
Default

Originally Posted by JerryU
I'm always amazed when you look at production stats that '76 tru '79 were peak sales years at 45 to 53,000/yr. Those were terrible HP years with the advent of new pollution controls, air pumps etc. Max hp was 225!
Originally Posted by kdm123
Yeah, exactly. The worst Vette was also the best selling. In the long run that really hurt the Vette image though
You forget (or maybe were too young) that in that era there was really no competition to Corvettes (and most American cars); 225 hp doesn't sound like much, but the other 2 seaters of that era had much less: Mazda RX7 - 100 hp, Datsun 280Z - 130 hp, Porsche 911 - 157 hp.
Much like today, the Corvette was a tremendous value for its relative performance if you wanted a 2 seat sports car.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2015 | 09:22 AM
  #11  
awright2009's Avatar
awright2009
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 346
Likes: 70
Default

I think they will just hold off a redesign until they recoup costs from the current generation, the C7 is finished, they just need to keep the small yearly tweaks and sell them
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2015 | 09:39 AM
  #12  
2vette2's Avatar
2vette2
Le Mans Master
Supporting Lifetime Gold
Veteran: National Guard
20 Year Member
St. Jude 15 Year Donor
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,040
Likes: 416
From: hardyston new jersey
St. Jude Donor '09-'25
Default

Originally Posted by NASTYC7
They ran the C6 line too long IMO. 4-5 yrs should be max for a body line in todays "Gotta have it" mentality. If they run the C7 for 8 years sales will drop the same. Most people could not tell you the difference between a 05vs13 model.
and I had both an 05 and a 13 and a couple in between. Except for A4 to A6 with paddle shifters, I don't think I could tell many differences.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2015 | 10:06 AM
  #13  
wbrands's Avatar
wbrands
Pro
Supporting Lifetime
10 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 565
Likes: 143
From: Bedford VA
Default

Originally Posted by NASTYC7
They ran the C6 line too long IMO. 4-5 yrs should be max for a body line in todays "Gotta have it" mentality. If they run the C7 for 8 years sales will drop the same. Most people could not tell you the difference between a 05vs13 model.
Some have called the C6 a C5.5 and I think I agree. Taking that into account, the C5/6 production run was 17 long years. About time for a new model and the C7 is a winner it appears.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2015 | 10:30 AM
  #14  
JerryU's Avatar
JerryU
E-Ray, 3LZ, ZER, LIFT
Supporting Lifetime Gold
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 34,992
Likes: 12,385
From: NE South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by LIStingray
You forget (or maybe were too young) that in that era there was really no competition to Corvettes (and most American cars); 225 hp doesn't sound like much, but the other 2 seaters of that era had much less: Mazda RX7 - 100 hp, Datsun 280Z - 130 hp, Porsche 911 - 157 hp.
Much like today, the Corvette was a tremendous value for its relative performance if you wanted a 2 seat sports car.
Thanks for the age comment! I recall in 1974, even my Uncle who was managing a large Chevy dealership at the time could, not get me a Vette! I bought a Datsun 260Z at the time and what a great car. Stock it was only 162 HP but removing the air pump, putting on long tube headers and performance exhaust, blocking the hot water to the intake manifold and using rich mixture needles in the two large Hitachi SU's carbs probably had about 175 or a bit more. The key was it weighed only 2500 pounds versus the 3500 for the Vette! With somewhat wider wheels and a set of quality tires it handled great. You're right that wasn't a good time for new car performance but really like the Z!
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2015 | 12:38 PM
  #15  
jcp911s's Avatar
jcp911s
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,598
Likes: 1,593
Default

GMs problem IMHO was miserable Executive Leadership... too many VPs,... too much noise and too little vision.

GM always had the best Engineers, best Marketers, best Accountants... worst CEOs... duh!

GM went bankrupt because is was scaled for 50% market share and through decades of incompetent Executive Leadership and lousy product, eroded to 25%... too many dealers, too many divisions, too much capacity, too much labor costs... chasing quarterly results rather than fundamental change, and just collapsed under the weight of excess capacity.

IMHO the "new" GM is a different animal... streamlined management, focused marketing, their products are competitive up and down the range... the C7 is raising lots of eyebrows in the Porsche community, I can tell you.

Future looks very bright to me...
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2015 | 03:02 PM
  #16  
NASTYC7's Avatar
NASTYC7
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 436
Default

Originally Posted by wbrands
Some have called the C6 a C5.5 and I think I agree. Taking that into account, the C5/6 production run was 17 long years. About time for a new model and the C7 is a winner it appears.

Driving down the road I have to look for tale tale signs between the two... Moving they are very similar at a stop it gets better.


Door handles, headlights and rear exhaust valence short or wide. To tell if it's a C5 or C6.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2015 | 05:58 PM
  #17  
LIStingray's Avatar
LIStingray
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 466
From: Long Island New York
Default

Originally Posted by jcp911s
IMHO the "new" GM is a different animal... streamlined management, focused marketing, their products are competitive up and down the range...Future looks very bright to me...
I see it much differently - I think Mary Barra is the reincarnation of the Smith, Stempel, Smith Jr., Wagoner and Henderson mold - all were GM lifers who believe GM is still regarded as the best product in the automotive world - which isn't true since the 1960's - and that people will pay a premium for them.
Just look at the new Cadillacs' - really nice cars, but if they expect anyone who owns a comparable Audi, BMW or Mercedes to buy one, they need it to be as good as those cars, and cheaper by 5-10% (the Acura and Lexus model) - instead, under the new fool who runs Cadillac, the ATS Premium Coupe, comparably equipped has a MSRP that is $1,200 more than a BMW 4 series, and on a lease it is $160 more per month. Who in their right mind would take a chance and buy a Cadillac for more money than a BMW?
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2015 | 08:59 PM
  #18  
roadbike56's Avatar
roadbike56
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 15,056
Likes: 1,613
From: Holly Springs NC
St. Jude Donor '16-'17,'22,'24
Default

Originally Posted by kdm123
Im curious about how profitable the Vette currently is for GM. Historically has the Vette always been profitable? From what I understand, the C3 and C4 were, but how about the c5 and C6?
After 97, it's introductory year, the C5 had only one year, 2002 when if failed to reach over 31000 units. In it's last two years the C5 sold over 35000 in 03 and over 34000 in 04 and that's with the knowledge that a redesign was on the way. The C5 was very profitable. Overall, the C5 sold 238230 units, over 18000 more than C6. The C5 sales numbers would be a good target for the C7. Personally, I hope it beats the C5 and continues to be profitable for GM and keep the Corvette legend going.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Corvette profitability





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE