When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Steve_R. Allow me to explain. Nothing against the large Forum dealers. As a matter of fact, I purchased my 2013 GS from Mike Furman, Criswell Chevy. The issue is my trade. The cost to ship my trade negates any savings I will inquire. My local dealer honors Supplier Pricing on the 2016. I suspect the issue is not Z51 parts constraints, but having a Z51 allocation. He has a confirmed Stingray allocation. The question is, is it for a Z51 or non Z51.
You might not save any money by ordering from one of the large forum dealers, but the difference will be actually getting an allocation for the car. I just ordered a 2016 Z51 from Mike Furman 3 weeks ago with the GMS (Employee) pricing. My order hit 3000 status and I got a TPW of 7/20 just one week after placing my order.
Seems like a simple solution to me, but I'm not sure why else you would be avoiding one of the large dealers when you've bought a car from one of them before.
Dave, you are in the business and know it better than I. However, the perception and reality is, Corvette ordering system is terrible as it relates to constraints, allocation, etc. IMO...!!! The entire experience of trying to place an order for a Z06, then switch to, what I thought would be a less painful experience ordering a Stingray Z51!!!!!!
Believe me, I feel your pain. I just wanted to let you know it wasn't a Corvette only issue. In fact, currently the amount of constraints on a Corvette are less than many other vehicles. You just hear about it more since many other GM products do not have the percentage of custom ordered cars as the Corvette and have no where near the following or enthusiasts sites like this one.
Don't go into your Cadillac dealer blind. They will have many of the same issues on a V as you see ordering a Corvette. As long as you are aware of it ahead of time you won't get blindside.
OP having had a couple of Cadi's and a couple of Corvettes.......... one thing I know.......all cars depreciate but you will take a beating on the Cadi. Will more then erase any savings you will get going local in the long run.
Bottom line GM is making business decisions everyday. We're not privy to how or why or know the details. Assuming most of us plop down more money for one of these buggies then I paid for my first house......... I guess I trust their business decisions since I enjoy the car so much.
In US, car dealers are independent businesses who own a franchise. GM has no direct control over dealers... dealers have an exclusive right to buy cars directly from GM, and sell them at retail.
GM must plan their production based on commitments from dealers to "buy" a certain number of cars... Dealers may call this an "allocation".
When a "hot" car like the Corvette exceeds sales expectations, the dealers may whine that they cannot get more cars, but when a car bombs... (can you say "Aztec") the same dealers will whine that GM is shoving unsalable cars down their throat...
It's a two-edged sword.
If the C7 had been a dud, all those big national dealers would be choking on unsold $50K cars... they're taking the risk.
Steve_R. Allow me to explain. Nothing against the large Forum dealers. As a matter of fact, I purchased my 2013 GS from Mike Furman, Criswell Chevy. The issue is my trade. The cost to ship my trade negates any savings I will inquire. My local dealer honors Supplier Pricing on the 2016. I suspect the issue is not Z51 parts constraints, but having a Z51 allocation. He has a confirmed Stingray allocation. The question is, is it for a Z51 or non Z51.
MacMulkin, the second largest Corvette dealer is in Nashua NH, about 40 miles from Boston - can't be that far from you?
Long before the C7 was even introduced to the public, Chevy dealers were told that their allocations would be based on the final year C6 sales. Remember, at that time, C6 sales were very low and were selling at huge discounts. Some dealers worked their butts off selling these C6's so they could get large numbers of C7's. These dealers took extra allocations that other dealers didn't want. Many dealers didn't bother trying to sell any C6's.
So. those that don't get many C7 allocations are just paying the price for not making an effort to sell those C6's. Those that did are being rewarded. Everyone knew the consequences long before the C7 burst onto the scene.
Exactly right but I think Chevy used the two previous model years to set the guide number which is why there was the initial number for the top 900 dealers and then midway through the year the second round that added to the top 900 but also added in the next 1100 dealers. By my reckoning that means 2000 Chevy dealers got an actual allocation and the rest got none. Not a single one. For over a thousand dealers. Of course there were training and tool requirements to justify so many dealers not getting a single useable allocation, but that's another story.
Actually, it would cost them $4,528 per C7 (based on 2015 sales) for each 1/10 mpg they miss the CAFE target, and that is only if the maintain sales at 35,000 per year.
I bet if the raised the Z51 package to $9,500, there would be no constraints on it.
You numbers are way off. Its $55 per MPG per passenger vehicle sold in the US.
How much of a gas mileage difference is the Z51 vs base? Doesn't the manual have the same final drive figures for at least the high gears and maybe all. I know the A8 in the Z51 has a higher rear end ratio but based on my experience with the C6 it really didn't matter. Both tires are the same width and the car is pretty much the same body otherwise. I'm guessing CAFE bases a lot of MPG ratings on estimates, which were done in a factory before. Then they guesstimate on options such as the Z51.
Funny, folks dismiss the difference in fuel mileage between a Z51 and non-Z51. Let's look at from another perspective, what are the GM documented performance differences?
Seems to me a non-Z51 Stingray is a dam fine car for the vast majority of owners that will NEVER track their car. For the few that do, I say buy a Z06.
If you do decide to go the Cadillac route I think you'll love it. My XLR-V was fantastic. Another real plus is that you'll have a whole different (read better) experience with a quality Cadillac dealer than with the typical Chevy dealer. The latter just doesn't know how to treat customers who spend $75 or $80K on a world-class car.
Since I already have my C7 I can't comment about the constraint issues affecting current orders. BUT, I fully agree with this comment about Cadillac being able to deliver customer service at a level that is appropriate to the price and make up of the customers who buy Corvettes. I have owned both brands (concurrently) for the last 20 plus years and have experienced service levels at both types of dealerships. On one occasion I took my Corvette in for overnight service and received a FORD Fiesta as my courtesy car from the dealer! Take the Cadillac in for service and I get a NEW Cadillac to use until mine is repaired!
As the price of our Corvettes escalate I have often thought that we (the customer) would be better served if the Corvette brand was a Cadillac!
Funny, folks dismiss the difference in fuel mileage between a Z51 and non-Z51. Let's look at from another perspective, what are the GM documented performance differences?
Seems to me a non-Z51 Stingray is a dam fine car for the vast majority of owners that will NEVER track their car. For the few that do, I say buy a Z06.
I totally agree, but this is p***ing in the wind. My guess is 90% of Z51 and 80% of Z06 will never see 1 minute at the track... people are ordering this purely for ego... "I bought the fastest "vette"... bla bla.
The Z51 package is for the track... it give no real benefit to a street car.
The OPs car... a 3LT Convertible Z51 is not a configuration that anybody would order for the track... IMHO, the Z51 option on this car is t*ts on a bull, but it's his money, and he should be able to buy what he wants...
From: And then it was said... "let there be blue Corvettes and yellow Camaros" Ft Worth Texas
Cruise-In IV Veteran
St. Jude Donor '09
Originally Posted by jcp911s
The Z51 package is for the track... it give no real benefit to a street car.
Well there are for sure some like me who do not wish to track their Z51 but who surely enjoy the Z51 features on back road cruises. Probably over half my miles will be on "spirited" Texas back roads just like my previous 2006 C6 Z51 was. I have driven non Z51 Corvettes on some of these cruises and for my satisfaction and pure driving experience the Z51 is my preference.
From: Calgary, AB. There's a reason why white was the only color offered on every year Corvette. Proud Canadian German Jamaican!
St. Jude Donor '09, '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17
Originally Posted by Dave@Kerbeck.com
The published EPA average is based on a planned sales forecast. They can publish the same EPA for both based on total sales, but too many Z51 would put them up to the next MPG and over what they published with the EPA.
Dave
so you're saying the gearing difference of the two make that much of a difference in CAFE ratings.....personally I can't see it, A8 vs MN7 yeah but not the Z51/non Z51.