When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
St. Jude '03 thru '24
Throttle Failure
A friends weekend vacation was recently ruined when his 2015 Roadster threw a code and went into limp mode. The local stealership claimed the problem was a result of shorted wire underneath the drivers "dead pedal". The claim was a screw (factory) penetrated a wire (bundle) that was part of the throttle system.
We'll know more later. For now its a "heads up" to anyone with a similar problem.
From: Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
St. Jude '03 thru '24
Some follow up on my buddys dilemma.
After the first failure and "repair" by a dealership, the car made it for a day.
Then the second event happened while driving. The car just shutdown!
After pulling off and restarting, all seemed fine so I followed him to a different dealership.
They had it for a week (replaced the throttle sender sensor) and during the drive home the car died yet again.
Now the dealership has spent two weeks and called to tell him they are unable to correct the problem.
He will be getting his money back, and chances are another C7 will not reside in his garage.
From: Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
St. Jude '03 thru '24
Hopefully this is the final note.
Problem: Coolant seeping from the overflow tank cap on to wiring harness below.
Thus causing corrosion in a harness connector, which includes the throttle circuit.
Fix: Clean connector contacts and lube with di-electric grease. Replace cap with new seal.
No more leaks. No more codes/problem.
Many thanks to Abel Chevrolet for their perseverance...
From: Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
St. Jude '03 thru '24
Originally Posted by SharkGrayStingray
wow happy ending after all!!!
Actually NOT. After 3500 miles he's reluctant to drive it any where's.
The code has become persistent. Four times fixed now.
At the end of August he applied for a "lemon law" return.
After many promised phone calls the General denied his claim.
So what's next? A lawyer?
I suggested he take it back to the dealer of origin and have them sell it or trade it.
But with their lack of assistance, he's not ready to buy from them again.
Anyone have a suggestion that might help him back into a reliable C7?
Since you are in CA, I assume your friend is also in CA. CA's basic definition of a "lemon":
Lemon Law Presumption*
Within the Song-Beverly Act, there is a presumption guideline wherein it is presumed that a vehicle is a “lemon” if the following criteria are met within 18 months of delivery to the buyer or lessee or 18,000 miles on the vehicle’s odometer, whichever comes first:
The manufacturer or its agents have made two or more attempts to repair a warranty problem that results in a condition that is likely to cause death or serious bodily injury if the vehicle is driven;
The manufacturer or its agents have made four or more attempts to repair the same warranty problem; or
The vehicle has been out of service for more than 30 days (not necessarily all at the same time) while being repaired for any number of warranty problems; or
The problems are covered by the warranty, substantially reduce the vehicle’s use, value, or safety to the consumer and are not caused by abuse of the vehicle;
If required by the warranty materials or by the owner’s manual, the consumer has to directly notify the manufacturer about the problem(s), preferably in writing. The notice must be sent to the address shown in the warranty or owner’s manual (for bullets 1 and 2).
If these criteria are met, the Lemon Law presumes that the buyer or lessee is entitled to a replacement vehicle or a refund of the purchase price. However, this presumption is rebuttable. The manufacturer may show that the criteria has not been met (for example, because the problems are minor) and therefore, the buyer or lessee is not entitled to a replacement vehicle or refund.
*Source: California Civil Code Section 1793.22(b).
Actually NOT. After 3500 miles he's reluctant to drive it any where's.
The code has become persistent. Four times fixed now.
At the end of August he applied for a "lemon law" return.
After many promised phone calls the General denied his claim.
So what's next? A lawyer?
I suggested he take it back to the dealer of origin and have them sell it or trade it.
But with their lack of assistance, he's not ready to buy from them again.
Anyone have a suggestion that might help him back into a reliable C7?
From: Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
St. Jude '03 thru '24
Originally Posted by Zymurgy
Since you are in CA, I assume your friend is also in CA. CA's basic definition of a "lemon":
Yep. The conditions for a lemon have been clearly met.
Repaired and recurred four times.
Owner suffers from COPD and should the car fail when cell service is unavailable....
First event at 3500 miles
Car purchased new in jan this year.
Situation sux for him as he's an avid Vette owner with three C2s.
Not really ready to give up but time is limited.