When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I live at 5k feet altitude (home is at 6500), and the highest octane we can get here is 91, which I use. When we road trip it, always get the highest octane we can find - usually 93 at lower altitudes. I'll never try and save a few $ by running a lower octane. As others have stated, owners manual says you can run lower if necessary, but you'll get lower performance and potential 'knocking'. And if you know what 'knocking' really is, you won't chance it.
So the owner's manual calls for a minimum of 91. Here in California that's the highest you can get. So you're always filling your tank with the minimum recommended. Is there any significant benefit with 93... performance? engine life? Should 91folks consider supplementing? Also, how precise is the octane measurement in gas? Are refiners allowed some deviation?
Octane, by itself, does not make power. Some think that increased octane carries with it more power like percentage of nitro. Higher octane allows the engine to maximize the tune. The anti knock sensors add timing until they sense knock. The higher octanes allow more ignition lead. The increased igniton timing makes more power. Higher octanes burn slower so you can hit them with spark sooner without pre ignition . Since 91 is such a good number going to 93 will make more horsepower and torque but by percentage it is not a big deal. Colder intake air could be just as effective. E85 is a whole different deal. Probably the biggest increase . Alcohol has 50% of the power of gasoline per gallon but you can increase the volume and make power because alcohol cools combustion chamber better then gasoline allowing tuning to make more power.
I use Sunoco 93. Works for me and I get .05% off every dollar I spend for gas. Retirement deal.
Last edited by Bill17601; Apr 25, 2016 at 08:02 PM.
Worse performance? Without flex fuel I would run out of fuel shy of 700hp. Have you looked into what you are saying at all????
Originally Posted by mschuyler
What is the benefit of using a lower powered fuel that gives you fewer mpg, worse performance, and will damage you entire fuel line including the injectors?
Octane, by itself, does not make power. Some think that increased octane carries with it more power like percentage of nitro. Higher octane allows the engine to maximize the tune. The anti knock sensors add timing until they sense knock. The higher octanes allow more ignition lead. The increased igniton timing makes more power. Higher octanes burn slower so you can hit them with spark sooner without pre ignition . Since 91 is such a good number going to 93 will make more horsepower and torque but by percentage it is not a big deal. Colder intake air could be just as effective. E85 is a whole different deal. Probably the biggest increase . Alcohol has 50% of the power of gasoline per gallon but you can increase the volume and make power because alcohol cools combustion chamber better then gasoline allowing tuning to make more power.
I use Sunoco 93. Works for me and I get .05% off every dollar I spend for gas. Retirement deal.
Well spoken. I think more importantly is finding a reputable station that has fresh gas and is Top Tier
93 Shell. I don't think the cheaper gas will hurt the car that much, but I do like the peace of mind that the gas I'm putting in will keep my engine clean and running smooth.
So the owner's manual calls for a minimum of 91. Here in California that's the highest you can get. So you're always filling your tank with the minimum recommended. Is there any significant benefit with 93... performance? engine life? Should 91folks consider supplementing? Also, how precise is the octane measurement in gas? Are refiners allowed some deviation?
In a nutshell, the reason you don't need more than 91 octane in higher elevations is because even for a high compression engine such as the ones in Corvettes the engine isn't sucking in as much air(oxygen) per cycle and doesn't require the extra octane to prevent knocking, or more accurately, detonation.
Last edited by Chemdawg99; Apr 26, 2016 at 06:19 AM.
Octane, by itself, does not make power. Some think that increased octane carries with it more power like percentage of nitro. Higher octane allows the engine to maximize the tune. The anti knock sensors add timing until they sense knock. The higher octanes allow more ignition lead. The increased igniton timing makes more power. Higher octanes burn slower so you can hit them with spark sooner without pre ignition . Since 91 is such a good number going to 93 will make more horsepower and torque but by percentage it is not a big deal. Colder intake air could be just as effective. E85 is a whole different deal. Probably the biggest increase . Alcohol has 50% of the power of gasoline per gallon but you can increase the volume and make power because alcohol cools combustion chamber better then gasoline allowing tuning to make more power.
I use Sunoco 93. Works for me and I get .05% off every dollar I spend for gas. Retirement deal.
Originally Posted by glass slipper
The bolded is an old wives tale that gets repeated so often that people actually believe it. The octane number of a fuel has zero correlation to its flame speed. The octane number is purely a measure of a fuel's resistance to knock and nothing more. In actuality, a slower flame speed increases the tendency for knock to occur.
There are some high octane race fuels blended to burn very fast for use in 500 cu in, 10,000 RPM Pro-Stock engines but you can put the same fuel in an engine happy on 87 octane and go faster in the 1/4 mi with reduced timing...it's all about reducing negative work.
Actually, you are both right and saying essentially the same thing. Not sure how you got "old wives tale" out of what Bill said in his post because it is correct and you are correct about what the octane number is.
From previously posted link:
Octane rating or octane number is a standard measure of the performance of an engine or aviation fuel. The higher the octane number, the more compression the fuel can withstand before detonating (igniting). In broad terms, fuels with a higher octane rating are used in high performance gasoline engines that require higher compression ratios.
People over-think these things in threads. Just like taking care of the leather in the Corvette, just follow what's in the owners manual and you will be fine. The Corvette has a high-compression engine, so while you can use a lower octane fuel in a pinch, you should use 91 or better to prevent detonating (knocking) and keep your ECM from pulling timing and retarding performance. It's just that simple.
It averages out to be ~91 octane, which is the car's spec, so it saves about 20-30¢/gal. every other fill-up and there have been no issues. I know, I have a $70k car, etc., etc. No need to go there.
Used this procedure with the C6, too, also with no issues. If the tank is more than a bit below 1/2 I use 93 octane regardless.
It averages out to be ~91 octane, which is the car's spec, so it saves about 20-30¢/gal. every other fill-up and there have been no issues. I know, I have a $70k car, etc., etc. No need to go there.
Used this procedure with the C6, too, also with no issues. If the tank is more than a bit below 1/2 I use 93 octane regardless.
I don't see how that helps as it really doesn't make much of a difference.
Seems to be an awful lot of trouble to go to to save a little bit of money, but to each his/her own.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.