When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The point made by many above that insurance coverage for windshield replacement is cheaper than the film is irrelevant here. The film is for small rock chip protection which insurance won't cover. Similarly, the film is not going to protect against breakage caused by a larger, high-speed projectile, which is the what insurance will cover.
However, it is a bit too pricey in my view.
My insurance covers small chips. Whenever I have a small chip, I call the glass people and come to the house to fix it. Insurance covers the cost.
Although some might see this product as a good investment, I personally think it is over priced and not necessary. JMO!
Last edited by rkhegler; Aug 30, 2016 at 01:49 AM.
My insurance covers small chips. Whenever I have a small chip, I call the glass people and come to the house to fix it. Insurance covers the cost.
Although some might see this product as a good investment, I personally think it is over priced and not necessary. JMO!
I once had insurance cover a chip in the windshield -- actually a bit of a star. Then I found out that they chalk it up to your claims history and it endangers your hopefully-low premiums.
and for $10 or so I've fixed 3 subsequent dings on a couple of different windshields. It's easy. The stuff works well. Since it's best to repair any dings, cracks, etc before they get any dirt in them, I usually carry a kit on road trips (though I haven't actually needed it on a road trip).
Well, this sounds like the tear-offs that race cars use. I researched this several years ago, and could not find any for regular cars. From what I've seen the race car ones have around 4 or 5 layers. But my main concern is the legality of this. I know it's illegal to tint windshields. Also, I think it would have to be around $100 per layer before most people would consider it.
I once had insurance cover a chip in the windshield -- actually a bit of a star. Then I found out that they chalk it up to your claims history and it endangers your hopefully-low premiums.
and for $10 or so I've fixed 3 subsequent dings on a couple of different windshields. It's easy. The stuff works well. Since it's best to repair any dings, cracks, etc before they get any dirt in them, I usually carry a kit on road trips (though I haven't actually needed it on a road trip).
Not included on my claims history. Guess the insurance company would rather pay $35 to fix chips than replace the entire windshield later.
Interesting product, I will check it out. Thanks for the suggestion.
For windshield chips to become a serious enough problem to detract from the driving experience, you have to have 100k+ miles on the car or more. How many corvettes get driven for 100k+ miles?
I am not saying these sorts of products don't do what they advertise, but it adds no value to a sports car that is mostly driven with care on good days. If you are looking for ways to throw money at your vette, this sounds like a good avenue.
Last edited by xxaarraa; Aug 30, 2016 at 07:40 AM.
For windshield chips to become a serious enough problem to detract from the driving experience, you have to have 100k+ miles on the car or more. How many corvettes get driven for 100k+ miles?
I am not saying these sorts of products don't do what they advertise, but it adds no value to a sports car that is mostly driven with care on good days. If you are looking for ways to throw money at your vette, this sounds like a good avenue.
Over the last 40 years I have had to replace a windshield maybe 3 times from external damage only on my daily drivers never on one of the Cadillacs or a Corvette.
Last edited by Team Player; Aug 30, 2016 at 08:16 AM.
From: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03 thru '26
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran
If the price was more reasonable, it would definitely be something to consider. I've got little chips in the windshield on my C5 that something like this might have prevented had it been available years ago.
The point made by many above that insurance coverage for windshield replacement is cheaper than the film is irrelevant here. The film is for small rock chip protection which insurance won't cover. Similarly, the film is not going to protect against breakage caused by a larger, high-speed projectile, which is the what insurance will cover.
However, it is a bit too pricey in my view.
Not sure what insurance company you have, but mine covers rock chip fixes, especially if it's in the driver's line of sight. They would rather pay the $100 to Safe-lite to repair the chips than $1100 for a new windshield.
For windshield chips to become a serious enough problem to detract from the driving experience, you have to have 100k+ miles on the car or more. How many corvettes get driven for 100k+ miles?
I am not saying these sorts of products don't do what they advertise, but it adds no value to a sports car that is mostly driven with care on good days. If you are looking for ways to throw money at your vette, this sounds like a good avenue.
You obviously don't drive anywhere near high traffic areas, or major cities.
I once had insurance cover a chip in the windshield -- actually a bit of a star.
Actually a "star" is considered breakage, and any projectile capable of doing that will likely penetrate the film and do the same thing to the glass. Insurance covers that, and most insurance companies will pay to fix that deductible-free with a "resin fill."
It's a smart business model because if they get you fix one of those those "stars," they usually don't grow into cracks, which will keep growing larger over time. The resin fix takes them off the hook for replacement down the road.
On the other hand most of us are talking about all the tiny little chips about the size of a grain of sand that you pick up over time. That's what the film protects against, and insurance doesn't cover that, any more than they cover tiny rock chips in the paint. That's just considered normal wear and tear.
You obviously don't drive anywhere near high traffic areas, or major cities.
Agreed, I've had windshields with a couple of dozen tiny little chips after as little as a year or two. It's particularly bad in the winter and early spring months when the roads are often treated w/ sand and fine gravel along w/ a melting agent to keep them passable during frozen precipitation.
In major urban areas, with bumper-to-bumper traffic at all hours of the day and evening, it's not possible to allow enough space between you and vehicle ahead to avoid them. Moreover, there always seems to be an uncovered dump truck ahead with all kinds of crap flying at you.
I'm sure those folks living in very rural areas w/ little or no traffic have a hard time getting their heads around why so many wrap cars with XPEL and would be interested in solutions like windshield protection.
I'm sure those folks living in very rural areas w/ little or no traffic have a hard time getting their heads around why so many wrap cars with XPEL and would be interested in solutions like windshield protection.
I live in one of those "very rural areas w/ little or no traffic" and drive my C7 to/from work and everywhere else unless the weather is really bad. I have Xpel Ultimate on it so I can certainly "wrap my head around" protection, which I consider a good investment. I won't, however, be paying $900 for any kind of windshield film. I have a '98 Jeep TJ that has right at 100k miles. It's been offroad and is my bad weather beater. The windshield is pretty much vertical so more prone to damage than a sloped C7 windshield. It doesn't have nearly enough little spots like you keep speaking about to impair vision or make me contemplate a new windshield.
IMO this stuff is a solution, and an expensive one at that, in search of a problem.
I live in one of those "very rural areas w/ little or no traffic" and drive my C7 to/from work and everywhere else unless the weather is really bad. I have Xpel Ultimate on it so I can certainly "wrap my head around" protection, which I consider a good investment. I won't, however, be paying $900 for any kind of windshield film. I have a '98 Jeep TJ that has right at 100k miles. It's been offroad and is my bad weather beater. The windshield is pretty much vertical so more prone to damage than a sloped C7 windshield. It doesn't have nearly enough little spots like you keep speaking about to impair vision or make me contemplate a new windshield.
IMO this stuff is a solution, and an expensive one at that, in search of a problem.
i agree, i would think that rural areas have more issues with panels getting dinged by the tires kicking up rocks where xpel is a good investment, than being behind a string of tractor-trailers on a major highway all day every day as they kick up rocks from all 18 wheels back into your grill and glass as is my situation in NY/NJ/LI.
Anywhere they do perpetual road construction you are going to get a lot of tiny chips.
I have had some quality screen protectors on my phone that after two years of hard finger swiping and they have zero scratches, I'm sure that same technology easily transfers to something larger. My concern would be air bubbles, at least I cant keep them away from a 5x3 inch screen
To me its not the cost of the replacement glass, its the hassle of getting it replaced and potential for the glass installer to mess something up. From what I have read the interior header panel has to be dropped down. Plus I would b pissed if I ended up with the double vision HUD like some have or a water leak after a replacement.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.