When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Fayetteville Arkansas recently moved from Oakland Ca
St. Jude Donor '06
safety warning features
Why don't Corvettes have safety features routinely found on other cars? Such as warning of nearby approaching automobiles (side and rear), weaving over line, being too close to car in front etc. I heard it was to keep weight down. If so (a) how much weight can this be and (b) as these cars are mainly driven on public roads isn't safety more improtant?? IMO safety should take prioratory.
Last edited by xlr8rvette; Jan 31, 2021 at 06:39 PM.
Why don't Corvettes have safety features routinely found on other cars? Such as warning of nearby approaching automobiles (side and rear), weaving over line, being too close to car in front etc. I heard it was to keep weight down. If so (a) how much weight can this be and (b) as these cars are mainly driven on public roads isn't safety more improtant?? IMO safety should take prioratory.
That was the exact reason straight from the horses mouth in a interview I seen with chief corvette engineer Tadge Juechter
All of those features are found in Cadillacs, Tahoes and Blazers. This one is a driver’s car, and in my opinion, I’m happy not to have my seat vibrating and warning alarms going off when I’m enjoying it. Your opinion obviously varies.
Why don't Corvettes have safety features routinely found on other cars? Such as warning of nearby approaching automobiles (side and rear), weaving over line, being too close to car in front etc. I heard it was to keep weight down. If so (a) how much weight can this be and (b) as these cars are mainly driven on public roads isn't safety more improtant?? IMO safety should take prioratory.
Weight may play a small part, however more likely the same reason GM doesn't offer a better sound system, forged wheels, a higher quality carpet and a few other items where GM opted to cut costs for the C7. It's because they take great pride in offing a Corvette that sells like hotcakes because it offers the most bang for the buck per HP than any sportscar on the market. Costing probably 1/3 of what some world-class sportscars it competes against for the sportscar buyer's dollar.
Probably because most 'vette drivers don't want 'em...
Offering them as an option would likely increase the cost of producing a car or make the option prohibitively expensive.
IMO those systems are a good idea, but not really ready for prime time. When I've rented cars with them, I found them nearly as annoying with false alarms and turned 'em off...
Why does every vehicle not have every feature? Why those that it does have? Ask the marketing people, at GM in this case... they, along with the number-crunchers make many such decisions. But, for me, since it IS a sports car I don't want all that crappola, nor half the stuff they did put on it.
Cost is the most likely reason and who needs all that crap anyways. Just seems to be no end to what people want but certainly would not be willing to pay for..Try using your mirrors, turning your head, paying attention etc. works great.
However keep in mind the platform came out in 2014 and some of these features weren't common place back then. Due to all the integrated electronics adding such features isn't easy. For example blind spot and cross traffic sensors have to be somewhere, in most vehicles these sensors are hidden into the tail light assembles. The C7's layout simply doesn't allow for this. Same with lane keeping - you need all kinds of sensors, wiring and steering motors to make this work - you can't just add it later because the underlying vehicle architecture doesn't support it. Its like adding ABS, airbags or traction control to an old school muscle car... not going to happen.