When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
For what it's worth, I just heard this morning on the news. If daylight savings were to be legislated permanent, over 37,000 deer hits would be reduced saving untold millions of dollars of damage to all kinds of vehicles. Something about the darkness being partly to blame. Not many deer around these parts, but this is certainly food for thought.
^ for sure
I'm pretty much always going to work in the dark except for a few months in the middle of summer, and I can say for sure the deer sightings and near misses on the roads are 90% of the time in total darkness
They must just be way more active then.
That [braking] is so wrong, it's dangerous. When you brake, your head goes forward. Then the air bag deploys and slams your head backward, not to mention your face is closer to the explosion.
The seat belts and air bag are specifically designed to address precisely this scenario. Airbags minimize injury in a frontal impact. It is their job.
So, you are driving at 50 MPH. A car suddenly pulls in front of you from a side road. You advise just plowing into the other car without braking because it is safer then hitting the brakes?
It's pretty cool to see a guy called Elk on a thread called Deer. I don't know where Zebra came from.
As for the brakes, I will continue to use them to avoid or lessen the force of a collision. Generally, your brain is fast enough to cause you to hold your head back when it tells your foot to mash the brakes.
I have hit a few deer over the years, and narrowly missed a couple elk, and have been saved by the brake pedal many times.
As for the brakes, I will continue to use them to avoid or lessen the force of a collision. Generally, your brain is fast enough to cause you to hold your head back when it tells your foot to mash the brakes.
.
Ask Dale Earnhart about your theory.
and Mr. Elk, your comparing hitting a 3,000 lb car, to a 200 lb movable deer .......
Basic physics always apply.
It isn't a theory, it is experience. Even without considering the fact that there aren't many deer on the Daytona track your analogy of that crash doesn't fit in this discussion at all. Anyone who sees an animal in their path while driving and does not use the brakes to some degree probably shouldn't be driving at all.
So, you are driving at 50 MPH. A car suddenly pulls in front of you from a side road. You advise just plowing into the other car without braking because it is safer then hitting the brakes?
^I was thinking this exact thing. I've had situations where I stopped 2 inches from hitting somebody. By this logic if you aren't sure you can stop you just go for broke and tank them.
Originally Posted by TyBoo
As for the brakes, I will continue to use them to avoid or lessen the force of a collision. Generally, your brain is fast enough to cause you to hold your head back when it tells your foot to mash the brakes.
^right, I have ceramics and I have absolutely gotten on them on dry roads to 100% of capacity because anti lock kicked in and I was more than capable of keeping my head in position.
The G forces from max braking aren't even in the ballpark of the G forces from a collision.
Originally Posted by the blur
Ask Dale Earnhart about your theory.
and Mr. Elk, your comparing hitting a 3,000 lb car, to a 200 lb movable deer .......
Basic physics always apply.
A racecar on a track is hardly a legitimate comparison.
And yeah physics do always apply, in some cases you'd probably be better off hitting a 3000 lb car. At least that's a solid object that will allow your car to crumple and the safety systems to do their job.
A 200 lb sack of meat on 4 skinny legs that would stand above the hood of our cars has enough mass to pass straight through the upper cabin if you were going fast enough.
There's no safety system that stops a mass from going through the windshield.
and Mr. Elk, your comparing hitting a 3,000 lb car, to a 200 lb movable deer .......
No comparison being made; it is always better to slow the vehicle as much as possible to lessen the force of a collision (or perhaps even avoid it entirely).
It makes no difference whatsoever if you are heading for a deer, a pedestrian, or an immobile cement wall. Hit the brakes. Hard. It is what brakes are for.
If you read my post. I didn't brake at all, because I didn't see the deer. Pitch black outside, unlighted highway. Deer comes out of heavy brush. Didn't see the deer before or after impact in the dark. I walked away basically unscathed.
Oct & Nov deer are in heat. Bucks chasing Does all over. Everyone that lives in a rural area knows Oct & Nov are danger seasons for whacking a deer. .
Regardless of our thoughts on braking, I am still sorry to hear about your crash and glad you came out of it good. I like the post-collision pic of the deer; do you have any of the post-collision car? Keep us posted oin the estimate and repair progress.
About braking or not braking. It's all automatic response in panic situations. You are not making a conscious decision. It just happens subconsciously.