When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Like many, If one knew why or how, and cared.... one would know! and then one'd care that the Corvette is doing what it's doing!.... Lag! Smoke and mirrors (and tuner mumbo jumbo) not gonna remove the lag till one removes its cause.. and that's next to impossible on the C5 Corvette with its designed ECU..... The lag is NOT gonna go away. There is no cable operating the throttle, the control is circuitry.... Electronically controlled by Sparkie and his Wizards!... Sometimes... one must drop back 10 and punt.
It boggles my mind that people modify the one single control they have over their engine without actually understanding what's happening -- or worse, insist their delusions are true.
It boggles my mind that people modify the one single control they have over their engine without actually understanding what's happening -- or worse, insist their delusions are true.
You're right. We're all wrong. There. Feel better?
With and without a throttle controller, stomping on the pedal to the floor is identical. You cannot give it more than 100% throttle. The throttle controller can only send a 100% throttle signal. There isn't an extra message, like "100% throttle, but do it faster please" -- the signal being received by the ECU, which ultimately drives the throttle body, is an amount of throttle. There is no mechanism by which to increase the speed at which the throttle plate physically opens that a throttle controller can adjust.
100% regardless of with or without is 100%. No dispute there. If you are hitting 100% from 0%, your wheels might be spinning so while it makes a great display, it does nothing. Could it be that these fooler devices, whether it is the TB or the Pedal Commander are doing is to change the equation slightly before WOT? Without them, when you depress it to X%, where X is less than 100%, you get Y% of throttle opening. Maybe with the foolers, when you hit the throttle to X% you get an opening of Y% +Z% so it feels like it is opening more than it used to?
If this is correct, can we not do it in the programming so we don't need the devices?
100% regardless of with or without is 100%. No dispute there.
I'm feeling like this realization is exclusive to fewer and fewer people these days.
Originally Posted by aklim
If you are hitting 100% from 0%, your wheels might be spinning so while it makes a great display, it does nothing. Could it be that these fooler devices, whether it is the TB or the Pedal Commander are doing is to change the equation slightly before WOT? Without them, when you depress it to X%, where X is less than 100%, you get Y% of throttle opening. Maybe with the foolers, when you hit the throttle to X% you get an opening of Y% +Z% so it feels like it is opening more than it used to?
If this is correct, can we not do it in the programming so we don't need the devices?
Correct on all accounts.
It's a pretty common practice across OEMs of budget/economy cars to have really touchy throttles because it fools people into thinking they're "sporty" -- until you realize the remaining 60% of your throttle pedal doesn't really do anything. Never understood why someone would want this, personally... it just makes the throttle pedal less precise. Give me a scalpel, not a hammer.
I'm feeling like this realization is exclusive to fewer and fewer people these days.
Correct on all accounts.
It's a pretty common practice across OEMs of budget/economy cars to have really touchy throttles because it fools people into thinking they're "sporty" -- until you realize the remaining 60% of your throttle pedal doesn't really do anything. Never understood why someone would want this, personally... it just makes the throttle pedal less precise. Give me a scalpel, not a hammer.
what they want and what you want can be two different things, and that's fine. It's only when you have to be responsible for them is when you should care what they do and want. Let them do what they want, it's no harm to you.
It's a pretty common practice across OEMs of budget/economy cars to have really touchy throttles because it fools people into thinking they're "sporty" -- until you realize the remaining 60% of your throttle pedal doesn't really do anything. Never understood why someone would want this, personally... it just makes the throttle pedal less precise. Give me a scalpel, not a hammer.
Why I want it might be a different story. Might be in the same basket as why I like pink shirts or steak. I think that in the OP's case, if he is doing a blower already, he probably has something going to go wrong with the thing if he just slaps it on. So, if he remaps the throttle responsiveness in the ECM while it is being programmed for the blower, maybe he can save on the Soler TB or the Pedal Commander unless what they do is different? Of course, if possible it could open a whole different set of things like maybe the traction control settings might not be as good, parts wear out faster, etc, etc. That and the "why" might be a different issue.
Sorry to slightly get off the subject but this reminds me of a similar experience.
Back in 1970,when I was in the Army, I bought a brand new Opel Kadett station wagon at the local Buick dealer.(They had the franchise back then). I had it in their shop a few times and got to know the “Opel Mechanic” pretty well. He told me that most times when he worked on them for any reason, he would tell the owners that he “tweaked” the adjustments to make the car more peppy. He said they almost always said they were amazed with the improved performance.
Back then the throttle pedal was mechanically connected to the carburetor and all he did was adjust the slack out of the linkage so the throttle would open slightly sooner when you depressed the pedal.
Sounds like he was ahead of his time. 😂😅
Sorry to slightly get off the subject but this reminds me of a similar experience.
Back in 1970,when I was in the Army, I bought a brand new Opel Kadett station wagon at the local Buick dealer.(They had the franchise back then). I had it in their shop a few times and got to know the “Opel Mechanic” pretty well. He told me that most times when he worked on them for any reason, he would tell the owners that he “tweaked” the adjustments to make the car more peppy. He said they almost always said they were amazed with the improved performance.
Back then the throttle pedal was mechanically connected to the carburetor and all he did was adjust the slack out of the linkage so the throttle would open slightly sooner when you depressed the pedal.
Sounds like he was ahead of his time. 😂😅
Along this line, my first car was a '65 mustang with a cam, Holley 600, and all the usual goodies. In its day it would take anything except a Grand National. First car, no mechanical inclination at the time. Under the hood one day and I noticed the(backyard, barn, trailer park) fabricated throttle linkage was cracked and was flexing more and more under full throttle, whici I never was getting. Maybe giving up 25% at full throttle. There was a brazing job done that was cracking. Being 16, I put a small hose clamp cinching down the cracked braze. Felt like I had another 100 hp to me. Though at 16 I would have also told you I was running a solid 300 hp and mid 12's in the 1/4.
It’s probably hard for most of us to determine real world differences with the throttle controller at “the track.” A more likely test is whether the time to the grocery store is faster. Yes. Yes it is. When you need Metamucil and Doan’s pills, fast is no longer relative.