Engine oil
As a petroleum chemist you may want to look again. Just saying...
What we said is correct.
Dex is a standard,...
products "like" Mobile1. See the word "like"?
ACDelco sysn is very much "like" Mobil1. Look at the chemistry spec sheet. Do you see any difference at all in their physical or chemical test results. Like means "like". If A=B then B=A.
Just saying.... What I said is correct.
How do you figure ACDelco Syn Blend is "very much like Mobil1"? Which M1 are you talking about? Do you have the sheets? Believe me, we've pulled them. They're quite a bit different, but thanks for playing.
I'm glad you're a chemist - that's our entire company's application, and we have a lab full of people for that (along with outside labs like TestOil, etc, who run tests all day long for us).
Yes, there are vast differences in physical and chemical results between the factory fill ACDelco syn blend and M1 Extended 5W-30s.
Don't blame my reading comprehension for a thinly-masked attempt at covering up your misinformation.
I swear, there are more and more people hopping on to the argument wagon looking to stir up a fight when literally 4 or 5 people here even have a handle on oil production, engineering, and testing...
Please, leave it to the professionals here (and I'm not including myself in that group, though I do have over a decade of applied knowledge of our specific industry) to debate the actual facts.
Now for my question! How did you come to be able to do these two runs?
TX Sam
PS. I will monitor oil temp. What temp is too high? I can back off at any time.
TX Sam
PS. I will monitor oil temp. What temp is too high? I can back off at any time.
Without knowing why they came to that decision, it's really hard to give you an answer (other than to do what you're comfortable with). For anecdotal evidence, I've run 0W-40 Castrol EU for dozens of track days in BMW engines, and 5W-30 M1 or Amsoil on LSx platforms for track events without any issues.
In my limited opinion, I don't think you'll see an issue running that for a short period, especially with the higher volume of oil and the dedicated cooler. You're also not in a full race condition - merely running at high speeds for a limited time (which really comes down to RPM load more than anything). Those high speeds may serve to give you enhanced cooling through the ducts, as well. Just my opinion, though.
Don't blame my reading comprehension for a thinly-masked attempt at covering up your misinformation.
I swear, there are more and more people hopping on to the argument wagon looking to stir up a fight when literally 4 or 5 people here even have a handle on oil production, engineering, and testing...
Please, leave it to the professionals here (and I'm not including myself in that group, though I do have over a decade of applied knowledge of our specific industry) to debate the actual facts.

If you were, indeed, referring to yourself as being the "first chemist in the world to test Mobil1 in Mil Spec sequence tests", then I applaud you (if that's something you're proud of). However, unless you were the first to test Mobil1 against ACDelco Synth Blend from BG (and you weren't, because our guys were
), you were factually incorrect.Anyway, I'm over it - it's silly that people cover up arguments by saying things like "you must need a hug". No, I'd rather just stick to facts here.
I will give my little boy a hug tonight, though, and hope that he will grow up to be a better person than either you or myself.
Wow, indeed, sir.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Without knowing why they came to that decision, it's really hard to give you an answer (other than to do what you're comfortable with). For anecdotal evidence, I've run 0W-40 Castrol EU for dozens of track days in BMW engines, and 5W-30 M1 or Amsoil on LSx platforms for track events without any issues.
In my limited opinion, I don't think you'll see an issue running that for a short period, especially with the higher volume of oil and the dedicated cooler. You're also not in a full race condition - merely running at high speeds for a limited time (which really comes down to RPM load more than anything). Those high speeds may serve to give you enhanced cooling through the ducts, as well. Just my opinion, though.

Last edited by bnall40; Feb 26, 2014 at 01:19 AM.
If you were, indeed, referring to yourself as being the "first chemist in the world to test Mobil1 in Mil Spec sequence tests", then I applaud you (if that's something you're proud of). However, unless you were the first to test Mobil1 against ACDelco Synth Blend from BG (and you weren't, because our guys were
), you were factually incorrect.Anyway, I'm over it - it's silly that people cover up arguments by saying things like "you must need a hug". No, I'd rather just stick to facts here.
I will give my little boy a hug tonight, though, and hope that he will grow up to be a better person than either you or myself.
Wow, indeed, sir.

You or Nick are more than welcome to talk to Jim or the mods if you'd like me disciplined. Have at it.
You're really getting on my nerves - it wouldn't be so bad if you contributed to threads here, but you don't. You're way out of line in this thread, as long as we're talking about rules. Had you not said anything, we would have parted ways and been done, but you can't help but be inflammatory.
Go find a hobby and leave me alone before you really **** me off. Nice golf cart, by the way. Keep this up, and there's going to be plenty of evidence that you're a pox on the community in every sense of the word. Contribute something for once or GTFO. Stop being an Internet tough guy. Nobody's impressed.
Edit: I'd also like to point out that not only one but two different PMs came from members privately supporting my fully justified argument against the incorrect data. I don't go running around looking for fights - actually quite the opposite. You'll find that I have a lot of good relationships here with vendors (Nick/Steve/Phil, Doug/Alex, Ron/David, and on and on), many members, etc. that extends past the forum. I don't really have to defend that.
Some people just take it personally when you correctly argue a point. Once it gets into a personal realm, I'm not going to let it go - I will go for the throat every time. No sugar coating that. The difference being that Nick and I, regardless of the nastiness involved, can at least walk away like adults and not keep going at one another. Ken, on the other hand, loves to hamstring people when they least expect it. Very grown-up of you, since you mentioned that first.
...
Last edited by Theta; Feb 28, 2014 at 04:23 AM.
It's oil for crying out loud. We've heard every single argument we could possibly have, both with fluid and filters.
You or Nick are more than welcome to talk to Jim or the mods if you'd like me disciplined. Have at it.
You're really getting on my nerves - it wouldn't be so bad if you contributed to threads here, but you don't. You're way out of line in this thread, as long as we're talking about rules. Had you not said anything, we would have parted ways and been done, but you can't help but be inflammatory.
Go find a hobby and leave me alone before you really **** me off. Nice golf cart, by the way. Keep this up, and there's going to be plenty of evidence that you're a pox on the community in every sense of the word. Contribute something for once or GTFO. Stop being an Internet tough guy. Nobody's impressed.
Edit: I'd also like to point out that not only one but two different PMs came from members privately supporting my fully justified argument against the incorrect data. I don't go running around looking for fights - actually quite the opposite. You'll find that I have a lot of good relationships here with vendors (Nick/Steve/Phil, Doug/Alex, Ron/David, and on and on), many members, etc. that extends past the forum. I don't really have to defend that.
Some people just take it personally when you correctly argue a point. Once it gets into a personal realm, I'm not going to let it go - I will go for the throat every time. No sugar coating that. The difference being that Nick and I, regardless of the nastiness involved, can at least walk away like adults and not keep going at one another. Ken, on the other hand, loves to hamstring people when they least expect it. Very grown-up of you, since you mentioned that first.
...
I really have no clue why people like Ken just stir the pot. You have two options in those cases - leave it alone and look like a fool, or respond and look like (arguably) an even bigger fool. It's a giant Catch-22.
I apologize for disrupting the thread with that post, but I would assert that it was certainly not unwarranted.
I do stand by the assertion that this thread has run its course, though, unless anyone has anything else constructive to add. I think many of us are moving on to talking about our supercharger installs, and getting our garage queens back on the road for spring.





There is absolutely no reason for name-calling here. If we cannot discuss things without things getting personal or name calling, this thread will be closed and vacations will be handed out.
Again, please stay on topic and no personal jabs.
Thanks.
As fluids heat up, they lose viscosity. The spec for a 30 grade oil is to have a viscosity of 9.3-12.49 cSt at 212F (100C). That is a pretty wide band. At high temp high shear (as might be seen in your bearings with hot oil at the track), a 30 grade is required to have HTHS viscosity > 2.9 cSt at 300F (150C). That is about a 70% loss of viscosity from 212F to 300F! This is why higher viscosity oil's are frequently used at the track. A 50 grade is required to have a viscosity of 16.3-21.89 cSt at 212F, and an HTHS of > 3.7 cSt at 300F. So at some point between 212F and 300F a 50 grade drops from ~ 19 cSt to ~ 4 cSt crossing through the ~ 10 cSt that a 30 grade has a 212F. Call that point 280F for discussion purposes. Take away is that a 50 grade at ~280F will have the same viscosity as a 30 grade at 212F. Hot oil temp is what I key on in determining what viscosity to use at the track.
As the viscosity drops, the fluid film strength drops and secondary wear protection (e.g. additives) become more important. Current API SN/dexos1 specs limit phosphorous, which along with zinc in a compound called ZDDP, or or zinc dialkyl dithio phosphate, forms an oil's primary anti-wear additive. Unfortunately, phosphorus slowly poisons the cats and prevents the catalytic exchange that allows them to function properly. To ensure auto companies could meet the EPA's 100k+ emissions requirements, the API has slowly been dropping the limit on phosphorus.
From 94-97, the API SH spec allowed up to 1200 ppm phosphorus. In 97, API SJ dropped the limit to 1000 ppm. In 04, API SM further dropped the limit to 800 ppm, but for the first time set a floor at 600 ppm and advertised that oil's were better. Essentially they were capping how much phosphorus the better oils could have and mandating the lowest amount the cheapest oils must have. The current API SN spec still has the band 600-800 ppm phosphorus. My AMSOIL Dominator 10w30 racing oil has 1575 ppm zinc, 1474 ppm phosphorus.
I don't know if "Gold Band" Mobil 1 complies with the 800 ppm limit or not. Personally would never use an oil at the track that didn't have more ZDDP than 800 ppm.
Given the drop in viscosity as oil heats up and the impact of fluid film strength, my own personal thumb rules are something like 30 grade < 260F, 40 grade ~260F - 280F, 50 grade >280F. These are only thumb rules. In my car at the track I typically see 245-255F which is right at the top of where I feel comfortable with the racing 10w30 I use - noting that the racing 10w30 I use has a viscosity near the upper band of a 30 grade; 11.4 cSt at 212F, 3.6 cSt at 300F. Mobil 1 5w30 is 11.0 and 3.1 for comparison (with 800 ppm phosphorus, 900 ppm zinc).
So depending on what your oil temp gets to in your 10-12 laps, the 5w30 you are using may or may not be okay.
Have fun!


C66 Racing #66 NASA ST2, SCCA T2
AMSOIL Dealer (Forum Vendor)
AMSOIL Preferred Customer Program (Members buy at Wholesale - a savings of about 25%)
1) The factory recommendation for racing purposes, Mobil 1 15W-50, contains 1200-1300ppm ZDDP.
2) The base-level Mobil 1 5W-30 contains 800-900ppm ZDDP. (thanks C66)
3) The Extended Peformance (Gold Band) Mobil 1 5W-30 contains 800-900ppm ZDDP.
4) Lastly, Mobil 1 Racing 0W-30 and 0W-50 contain 1750-1850ppm ZDDP.
Mobil 1 Product Spec Sheet (PDF): http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/...duct_Guide.pdf
Additional citation from Mobil: http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/..._Products.aspx
Last edited by Theta; Mar 3, 2014 at 01:54 PM.











