When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
This issue has nothing to do with kits and everything to do with GM OEM parts failure, period. This will happen on N/A stock cars as well, given that GM is already replacing seals, balancers, etc. under warranty. I'd also love to see a picture of your supercharged C7, by the way!
Check ***** have been removed and the issue still exist. There's something else going on.
Notice I didn't say the check valves specifically, I said "GM OEM parts failure".
For regional to authorize engine work like this, it's an internal/OEM failure. They're very quick to deny any warranty work or parts replacement needed due to modification.
To date no BETA cars, or Customer cars with ProCharger C7 systems have had any leaking front or rear main seals. Hundreds of boosted Dyno pulls on various cars (Auto, Sticks, Wet Sump, Dry Sump, Etc), LOTS of boosted street miles, all leak free.
Our PCV set up vents to the inlet just before the blower, and has been since day one.
We have (2) large 5/8” hoses from each valve cover to the inlet on the wet sump cars.
Dry sump cars have (1) 5/8” hose and (1) 3/8” hose.
The PCV system on these cars is very straight forward.
Just thought that might ease some concerns.
ATI ProCharger
I just read you installations instructions and it looks like both valve cover check valves were removed from the OEM PCV system along with the a check valve between the air intake manifold and valley pan area; did I misunderstand your instructions? Somehow that just doesn't seem right.
Notice I didn't say the check valves specifically, I said "GM OEM parts failure".
For regional to authorize engine work like this, it's an internal/OEM failure. They're very quick to deny any warranty work or parts replacement needed due to modification.
So are you assuming it's the seals going bad? Good thing I don't have a Auto!
So are you assuming it's the seals going bad? Good thing I don't have a Auto!
I'm not making a guess at the specific part - we can assume (see below) it's something that's either a problem in the design or manufacturing process.
External stresses and influences are heavily policed for internal engine warranty repairs. For them to start spending money and acknowledging a problem, that leaves the deduction above.
Have any of the shops put a manometer on the engine to monitor crankcase vacuum and pressure while running the engine?
Seems to me the first step is figuring out when the pressure spike hits and how high it goes.
Once you see the spike it might be easier to figure out what happened at that event.
Perhaps this is related to how the auto shifts and the load on the engine.
Perhaps a double downshift and rpm's jumping wildly making the boost pressure suddenly exceed the normal pressure when under load?
A centrifugal super charger is nothing more than a fan and follows a fan curve. Change the engine RPM's from 2000 to 5000 by matting the accelerator and that fan speeds up quickly to move air. Take your foot of the accelerator quickly again and it over delivers air for a short period and the engine can't take it. The pressure in the crankcase might spike as a result.
This type of scenario does not normally happen in a standard tranny but is common in an auto.
Still in the testing stages, but looks like a collaboration between a few of our good colleagues ETMC, Slowhawk, ECS we all may be onto something here. ETMC is doing some testing this afternoon on their car, as we are also.
And NO this fix does not require any additional breather tank. As ETMC & us finalize the testing, I am sure Doug ECS will chime in on behalf of ECS. Very minor stuff, but just enough to make the difference, does not change how the car drives at all and is perfectly safe for longevity!
Last edited by Matt @ FSP; Apr 7, 2014 at 03:10 PM.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer
Brett Foote
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years
Joe Kucinski
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
...Does the breather tank prevent the issue should you, say, already have one?
I am unfamiliar with the LMR tank.. Looks awesome, and judging by Steve/Reid and the guys I am sure it works well... Theta can you do all of us a favor and inform us of how the LMR tank integrates with the intake manifold and valley port fittings, specifically behind the TB.
Sorry, I wasn't stirring the pot - I was genuinely interested.
Since I have the ECS kit, that line you're referring to uses the ECS T-line that runs to the BOV. It's a piece of hard tubing with EDPM hose ends secured to both barbs via clamps.
I'm not sure how it would integrate on a N/A car, though.
Still in the testing stages, but looks like a collaboration between a few of our good colleagues ETMC, Slowhawk, ECS we all may be onto something here. ETMC is doing some testing this afternoon on their car, as we are also.
And NO this fix does not require any additional breather tank. As ETMC & us finalize the testing, I am sure Doug ECS will chime in on behalf of ECS. Very minor stuff, but just enough to make the difference, does not change how the car drives at all and is perfectly safe for longevity!
That's fantastic. You guys are great!
Any chance of one of the existing vendors selling the supplies and info necessary for a Pfadt-boosted orphan to update that setup as well?
Sorry, I wasn't stirring the pot - I was genuinely interested.
Since I have the ECS kit, that line you're referring to uses the ECS T-line that runs to the BOV. It's a piece of hard tubing with EDPM hose ends secured to both barbs via clamps.
I'm not sure how it would integrate on a N/A car, though.
Oh I know you are not stirring the pot bud.. I admire what you did for the DIY instructions actually and you seem to know the car well... This is a collaboration of information from long-standing tuner shops, however, none of us are afraid of taking information in since this is all new to us. The shop that does not keep their ears or mouths open are the ones that will have issues as the ones that work with each other will solve issues (Generalization, not talking specifically about this issue).
Yes, let me just say in testing that hose is a bit different now. I was unsure if the LMR tank integrated within the stock check valve /valley port and/or the manifold. So basically you are "STOCK" ECS u-shaped hose w/ the vac nipples.. ETMC and FSP have changed that around a bit, I do not want to say exactly what yet because we are still testing. We have 7 complete successful dyno pulls all the way up so far, and about 50 street miles so I cannot call this a success yet.
Oh I know you are not stirring the pot bud.. I admire what you did for the DIY instructions actually and you seem to know the car well... This is a collaboration of information from long-standing tuner shops, however, none of us are afraid of taking information in since this is all new to us. The shop that does not keep their ears or mouths open are the ones that will have issues as the ones that work with each other will solve issues (Generalization, not talking specifically about this issue).
Yes, let me just say in testing that hose is a bit different now. I was unsure if the LMR tank integrated within the stock check valve /valley port and/or the manifold. So basically you are "STOCK" ECS u-shaped hose w/ the vac nipples.. ETMC and FSP have changed that around a bit, I do not want to say exactly what yet because we are still testing. We have 7 complete successful dyno pulls all the way up so far, and about 50 street miles so I cannot call this a success yet.
That's interesting - I'll look forward to the results. Seems like a rather easy fix so long as we can keep vacuum for the BOV. For N/A cars, you could probably just run that to the breather, as well.
Any chance of one of the existing vendors selling the supplies and info necessary for a Pfadt-boosted orphan to update that setup as well?
Once again, I am not trying to be covert about this but don't want to give information that is not verified.. It would be a simple fix for any systems to be retro-fitted with a few dollars at the local auto parts store, IF THIS WORKS
That's interesting - I'll look forward to the results. Seems like a rather easy fix so long as we can keep vacuum for the BOV. For N/A cars, you could probably just run that to the breather, as well.
Yep vacuum for BOV or other accessories (Boost gauge, etc.) still will work perfectly fine.
Once again, I am not trying to be covert about this but don't want to give information that is not verified.. It would be a simple fix for any systems to be retro-fitted with a few dollars at the local auto parts store, IF THIS WORKS
Makes sense. I for one am happy to wait for a verified solution!
We have seen at least 3 questions about this in the last couple days.
And here is how ours is set up, and now with hundreds and hundreds of miles, without any issues, and has been working good since day one. (Back since late fall of last year)
Dry Sump Cars
Dry Sump Tank (Vented to Blower Inlet)
Right Valve Cover (Vented to Drysump tank)
Left Valve Cover (Vented to Blower Inlet)
Valley Cover (Capped off)
Wet Sump Cars
Right Valve Cover (Vented to Blower Inlet)
Left Valve Cover (Vented to Blower Inlet)
Valley Cover (Capped off)
No check valves were retained due to possible issues with them sticking. (We had seen it before, didn't want it to happen) Nipple off throttle body that was going to valley, is now used for our vacuum log manifold for attaching vacuum points such as bypass valve, boost gauge, dyno logging equipment, etc.
As stated before, customers are more then welcome to change our set up how they want, and can add whatever means of breathers, or catch cans, however we just wanted to share that we haven't see any issues thus far. With absolutely no rear/front main seal leaking issues, etc. We may look into doing a catch can / oil separator in the future for those that want one, but so far haven't had a reason to have one, other just to satisfy the customers wants.