When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
OK we have found the culprit regarding this issue guys.
The check valve, which actually is a plastic ball in the breather lines, are sticking on some vehicles. This would have started happening with stick cars too in time, but they hit higher vacuum numbers then the auto's do which pull them open again.
The slightest amount of crap on the ball and it will stick, I checked a stock car today that had one working and one stuck.
This is not a "boosted" problem, but a GM problem in my eyes, but we will probably provide a new clipped end without the check valve to eliminate the issue.
Those that are already supercharged, I suggest you just remove the check valve from the hose end, it's pretty simple to do.
You may have had this issue when you were stock, but you would not have created enough crank case pressure to see it's negative effects.
Problem solved!
Will the removal of the check ball cause any adverse effect on the engine? Why would GM install them then? Thanks in advance Doug.
As I said above, I don't anyone would disagree that you should use at least a catch can on these motors (especially with FI). Elite has a very nice can (the E2), but I decided to go with the LMR to eliminate any worries with pressure.
As power scales, you'll eventually overpower the stock PCV, but that takes more than a blower kit. They originally made the breather for their twin turbo system, so it's kind of overkill.
Either way, several of us would recommend having something to catch that oil.
Just ordered one. Theta I wish you were my next door neighbor.
Since Doug has posted a resolution to this issue for both his and A&A's kit, I wonder how to rectify on the ProCharger kit; as Doug mentioned that since he has not seen one, he cannot comment.
Will the removal of the check ball cause any adverse effect on the engine? Why would GM install them then? Thanks in advance Doug.
If they worked correctly, a check valve implementation would be prudent in order to limit crankcase pressure, etc.
Unfortunately, this looks like a bad design with the metal-on-plastic construction. As soon as there's any friction, a lack of continuous lubrication will wind up making the ball 'stick' as we're seeing here.
Since Doug has posted a resolution to this issue for both his and A&A's kit, I wonder how to rectify on the ProCharger kit; as Doug mentioned that since he has not seen one, he cannot comment.
From what I have seen, and this could have been a pre-production thing, ProCharger was replacing those valves with hose lines running to somewhere (sorry, not sure where). This pic will illustrate my comment:
We probably wouldn't get anything else done, and both spend a lot more money on modding.
I only have one 'Vette guy in my subdision ('09 Z06 and a 1972 'vert).
Yep love working on my cars and it helps when you have a lift. Checked mine tonight and the valves were working fine on my car. Just need a supercharger. Looks like nobody wants my $5k plus.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer
Brett Foote
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years
Joe Kucinski
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Yep love working on my cars and it helps when you have a lift. Checked mine tonight and the valves were working fine on my car. Just need a supercharger. Looks like nobody wants my $5k plus.
Yep love working on my cars and it helps when you have a lift. Checked mine tonight and the valves were working fine on my car. Just need a supercharger. Looks like nobody wants my $5k plus.
Your kit is on the way and Kevin has you scheduled for a lift I'll have him call you tomorrow to get you an update.
Only hold up was head units from Novi, but that has been taken care of
Since Doug has posted a resolution to this issue for both his and A&A's kit, I wonder how to rectify on the ProCharger kit; as Doug mentioned that since he has not seen one, he cannot comment.
Since the first C7 we BETA tested on, we have removed the factory check valve. All systems are/have been sent that way as well. (As stated no leaks so far on BETA's or Customers)
Some customers want to run catch cans, some done, some vent their cars to the exhaust, some into the fenders, some to the front of the blower. It seems everyone, and every shop has their own opinion, which is totally fine. We just chose to vent them to the front of the blower.
Once CARB testing starts, things may change, can't say for sure since thats in the future at this point. Just answering your current question thought.
not familiar at all but is boost or maybe even a bypass puls 'jamming' this ball?
is this gm's new version of a pcv valve to get out of the 'fixed orifice' drawbacks?
i figure the long term fix will show up on the c7z eh?
and LIKE!
Originally Posted by Theta
I would say (and again, I could be wrong here) that it would be an excellent idea for anyone considering a supercharger kit, or has already had one installed, to invest in some sort of a breather.
I just saw MightyMouse today, and it looks like an excellent solution versus the far more expensive LMR box like I have. I believe those types are also legal, unlike mine...
It's a small price to pay for additional peace of mind. In the long run, this might be a fluke, or it may be the real deal. In the mean time, why not have some insurance after buying a kit that costs (at the very minimum) $5000 + install?
What's the negative implication of running full time without the valve in operation, besides oil buildup, for a supercharged vehicle?
Shouldn't be any - you're just turning it into a breather system at that point by removing the check valve. It all depends where you dump the lines after that, as you'll get oil discharge.
It's much better to have it collect in a box/can than into the bay or out to the pavement.
Shouldn't be any - you're just turning it into a breather system at that point by removing the check valve. It all depends where you dump the lines after that, as you'll get oil discharge.
It's much better to have it collect in a box/can than into the bay or out to the pavement.
That makes sense, thanks. Does the factory setup (sans check valve)discharge to the engine bay or out to the pavement?
From: Providing the most proven supercharger kits for your C5/6/7 609-752-0321
In regards to the catch can, you need to remember that the PCV system does not go back into the intake manifold like previous years did. In those cases the vacuum supplied from being there would pull a great deal of oil into the engine, thus needing the catch can.
I have yet to see any oil on any of the vehicles we have built in the air box, or in the port that goes from the valley to the intake on the drivers side.
Until I do, which we may once these start getting road raced with superchargers etc, then I'm going to say it is not needed. They only serve one purpose, catch oil coming from the breathers, if there isn't any, then it's not doing anything.
The C7 has pretty good baffles inside the valve cover and valley cover, which have made a big improvement on oil consumption threw the PCV system.
This being discussed is for a stock car with a charger, not a 1000+rwhp build which would need more venting most likely, or if the dry sump tank was overfilled.
In regards to the catch can, you need to remember that the PCV system does not go back into the intake manifold like previous years did. In those cases the vacuum supplied from being there would pull a great deal of oil into the engine, thus needing the catch can.
I have yet to see any oil on any of the vehicles we have built in the air box, or in the port that goes from the valley to the intake on the drivers side.
Until I do, which we may once these start getting road raced with superchargers etc, then I'm going to say it is not needed. They only serve one purpose, catch oil coming from the breathers, if there isn't any, then it's not doing anything.
The C7 has pretty good baffles inside the valve cover and valley cover, which have made a big improvement on oil consumption threw the PCV system.
This being discussed is for a stock car with a charger, not a 1000+rwhp build which would need more venting most likely, or if the dry sump tank was overfilled.
When I had my catch can installed shortly after my sc was installed, I had some oil in the intake and also on the filter where the hose went into the air box.
The C7 has pretty good baffles inside the valve cover and valley cover, which have made a big improvement on oil consumption threw the PCV system.
This is very true - I should have taken some pics when I had mine off.
I do have to disagree, though (and you know I don't do that often with you, Doug ). There have been nearly a dozen cases of non-overfilled oil buildup issues (two severe) taken care of in the service department in the last 2 months, and this was from a dealer that caught the 9.8 in PDI.
Driving habit? Tolerances? Something else unknown? Who knows. It's pretty cheap insurance for some sort of a can or breather though.
That being said, you just saved GM from a hell of a lot of repair costs if that's all it was with the valve.
From: Providing the most proven supercharger kits for your C5/6/7 609-752-0321
Originally Posted by Theta
I do have to disagree, though (and you know I don't do that often with you, Doug ). There have been nearly a dozen cases of non-overfilled oil buildup issues (two severe) taken care of in the service department in the last 2 months, and this was from a dealer that caught the 9.8 in PDI.
Just to comment on this specifically, I have spoken to multiple dealers that have already had cars in for breather issue problems. Thus resulting in oil being forced out the breather lines. They were all stock vehicles, naturally a supercharger will compound those issues.
Once this is corrected the way it has been described in this thread, it is no longer an issue, so I am sticking with my statement of a catch can is not necessary at this point on an ECS SC equipped vehicle.
For one, if there is oil pushed, it will onto go into the air box on our kit, not the intake/engine itself but the vapor is so you do not get any oil smell in the car. Also I have looked at every car here including the one that made 750rwhp, and all are dry as can be.
If for any reason this opinion changes, I will be the first one to post it up!.