Anyone noticed a slight delay when hitting the accelerator?
1. Read pages 9-37 through 9-47, granted a lot of pages so focus on page 9-45 and 46.
2. Rem, an old DOS programming term for deleting a code line.
3. (What gets disconnected in Track mode (sounds serious)? read page 9-46.
4. How many cars have I connected, 2000, 2002, 2005 and my 2007 Z06.
5. Conspiracy theory, well as I explained to you that I contacted companies that have close relationships to GM, Lingenfelder and Katech both said that there is little to no gain when tuning a stock LT1, 5hp was the best attained. Then when you read responses from people that had a tune saying how much better the throttle response is and you read the parameters from the manual you see to issue.
6. That's when I believe you told me to go away with my BS.
2. No one is deleting anything from a tune. Terrible analogy and lends an example of your logic....outdated.
3. I didn't see anything about disconnecting on your referred pages.
4. What did you connect them to? I asked what cars have you personally calibrated, keys words "and tuned." Are you prepared to have an in depth discussion on the topic without referring to third party sources? Can you post your tune files and the changes you made and tell us why you made them?
5. Yes, you claim to quote only companies that sell parts packages, categorized by HP levels. None of these companies have posted anything about having no gains, in fact, the only public information (ie. not your claims) shows dyno proven gains. By the way, your PMs state that Katech and Lingenfelter told you there is precisely ZERO to be gained from a tune, now you say it's "a little." I mean, can we at least attempt accuracy?
6. Yes, that is precise.
This is No illusion if you've ever looked at an E92 tuning file of a DI engine--There are extreme throttle position delays and TQ delays in the mid-range---If you can make your car quicker thru the mid range--you will have a faster ET----Now if you are simply looking for MAX HP at 6400 RPM's on a dyno that is something else--But if you are looking to make your car "quicker" a tune can make a great increase in ET
2. No one is deleting anything from a tune. Terrible analogy and lends an example of your logic....outdated.
3. I didn't see anything about disconnecting on your referred pages.
4. What did you connect them to? I asked what cars have you personally calibrated, keys words "and tuned." Are you prepared to have an in depth discussion on the topic without referring to third party sources? Can you post your tune files and the changes you made and tell us why you made them?
5. Yes, you claim to quote only companies that sell parts packages, categorized by HP levels. None of these companies have posted anything about having no gains, in fact, the only public information (ie. not your claims) shows dyno proven gains. By the way, your PMs state that Katech and Lingenfelter told you there is precisely ZERO to be gained from a tune, now you say it's "a little." I mean, can we at least attempt accuracy?
6. Yes, that is precise.
Curious on who publishes the tuning manual that you referenced I’m assuming it was you, care to share. Also are you the one on another thread saying the Z51 option is a waste?
Curious on who publishes the tuning manual that you referenced I’m assuming it was you, care to share. Also are you the one on another thread saying the Z51 option is a waste?
I would never buy an automatic corvette but that doesn't mean I haven't tuned plenty of them....
I don't solicit business on this website so you will never "hear of me." I am a member here as an individual not as a vendor. I just like vettes, but that's not my only car either. I have tuned a few hundred cars since 2007/2008 and I never once said gm did anything wrong or profess to "know more than gm engineers."
however, I do know their hands are tied in many respects and mine are not, nor are yours if you know what to do.
my only problem with you is your lack of information, also known as ignorance, cloaked in "responsibility of preserving the gm engineer's lowest common denominator warranty and emissions guidelines" when all you really need to say is, "I don't really know what you guys are doing when recalibrating ECMs and TCMs but I am happy enough with my car as is" and just go about your business.
and no, I do not find value in a Z51 package at all but that doesn't mean there isn't value in it for someone else. do you want to argue about that too?
you go be you. no one else is.
edit: btw, my profile doesn't list my past cars because they are past cars....there are probably 70 of them, you want me to list them? no way, I can't even remember them in one sitting. I don't own them now so they don't go in a list of cars I own....neither do non corvettes on a corvette forum.
Last edited by Higgs Boson; Dec 31, 2014 at 01:03 AM.
That is the reason for one of the delays
There are several others--
-The traction control system limits TQ below 1600 RPM's to below 380
Power enrichment has a delay until the car reaches 20 MPH
Power enrichment is delayed IF the throttle increase rate is too fast
Finally in the TQ response tables -- The HP is limited sometimes to almost 1/2-- below 100 MPH and 75% throttle position
As an example the stock tune at 60 MPH and at 75 % throttle position the HP is limited to 243 HP
Good news !!! all this can be updated with a real tuning software--either EFILIVE or HP- It makes a huge difference even on a bone stock car---
Basically tuning will allow the engine to make "all the power it can---ALL THE TIME regardless of the MPH or Throttle position or RPM--- !!!
Would you know if it's true or not?
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
https://www.sprintboosterusa.com/p-3...rvette-c7.aspx
I notice audibly blipping the throttle from low to mid RPM that it has a clear hiccup before getting going. I noticed this personably time and time again and have said nothing about it. It reminds me specifically of the 4 barrel carbs of the 60's and 70's that pause and bog 1/2 a second before kicking in.
I notice audibly blipping the throttle from low to mid RPM that it has a clear hiccup before getting going. I noticed this personably time and time again and have said nothing about it. It reminds me specifically of the 4 barrel carbs of the 60's and 70's that pause and bog 1/2 a second before kicking in.
what is the point in blipping the throttle at any point other than decelerating into a corner on the brakes and switching to a lower gear just before letting the clutch out?
friends don't let friends blip in park/neutral
Since my C7 has severe lag from a standing start and bogs down at low RPM's, could the dealer service department tune the engine to eliminate the lag? Like many other owners of competing sports cars that switched to C7's, I believed GM and the various magazine reviews "hype" prior to purchase, and this inherent defect was swept under the rug.
Does anyone know if tbe "tune" could be wiped from the memory in the ECU if the motor blows? In fact, if GM voids the warranty after a tune, aren't they admitting that the engine has weaknesses that would permit it to blow if the engine was tuned for highest performance? Please note that I'm not seeking more HP, it has plenty but is simply unresponsive. I drive a M7 and know how to drive, so that's not the issue since I've had no prior throttle lag issues with Porsches or even a 350Z I owned years ago. My first Vette, a 1964 with 327 c.i. motor running solid lifters and a Holley 850 CFM carb had "zero lag - Chevy knew how to build great engines. Evidently, smog rules are the problem, along with fuel economy.
Don't get me wrong, my goal is not drag racing as I do not enjoy tearing up engines at the strip. I just like driving responsive cars like my last Cayman S. I appreciate the C7's appearance and high HP, along with the guttural roar of the V-8 motor that my new C7 offers, but this throttle lag is seriously damping my enjoyment of driving.
Is there a tuner in the Orange County or Los Angeles area that knows how to correct this problem? Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Last edited by hifiguy; Jan 3, 2015 at 06:01 AM.
or maybe you're just doing it wrong. how can we know? because you say "I know what I'm doing?"
Then I found a thread about an aftermarket tuner called Trifecta who claim they can reprogram the ECU but then erase the mods if the car has to be repaired later. Obviously,this seems to be the ideal situation for the "borderline performance" that I'm experiencing. Has anone dealt with Trifecta? They claim their system will eliminate the throttle lag and will be invisible to GM code readers.
Then I found a thread about an aftermarket tuner called Trifecta who claim they can reprogram the ECU but then erase the mods if the car has to be repaired later. Obviously,this seems to be the ideal situation for the "borderline performance" that I'm experiencing. Has anone dealt with Trifecta? They claim their system will eliminate the throttle lag and will be invisible to GM code readers.
Good Luck and Enjoy!
Here are some pictures of my Mercedes Install. Works great...
Last edited by BPhillyc8; Jan 4, 2015 at 10:31 AM.
or maybe you're just doing it wrong. how can we know? because you say "I know what I'm doing?"
In the 14's there were a number of complaints with throttle response. The "blip" is an excellent way to experience the disconnect between the throttle pedal and the ECU. I had the problem (VIN 5933, manual trans) but it was greatly improved when I took the car in for other updates and one of them included an update for throttle response. It is all about emissions. Any extra effort anyone has used to argue with a fellow forum member would be better spent directed at reining in an out of control EPA.
Those with the A8 need to study up on their transmission and it's learning curve. Once that is understood, then address the throttle if they still have a problem.



















