So how much is too much?
The bad thing is its not expensive to do it so that makes me want to do it more.
But how much is too much from a drivability standpoint? One of my employee's really wanted to drive my car and I told him it would have to be before I put the SC on it because I was really expecting to be more like skating on ice under 40-50 mph.
I'd put anyone in the driver seat and let them drive it now. The car is so controllable and traction is great. Even in the corners you can lay into it pretty hard and it holds the road pretty well.
In Track mode PTM 2 I can go through 1st and 2nd with no wheel spin if the weather is over 70 degree's which makes the car very enjoyable to drive since you do not need to pedal it.
I swear it has more traction now than before. I'm sure I'm spinning the tires a bit but it doesn't feel like it.
Now with wanting more power how much is going to be too much where the car's power overwhelms its traction?
I had settled on getting R888's before but its perfectly fine with the ZP's and I'd take it cross country. If I add another 60-70 ft lbs of torque is it going to be like that?
If its not how far can you go? I can do headers and meth, or just headers.
I am planning for a wide body this winter, how much will those 12" wide wheels help?
Are you thinking of headers, cam, and meth for 700? Just curious as I am planning what to do with the wife's Z51 next time she travels out of the country, lol. When she returns, she'll be asking what the whooshing sound is.
Are you thinking of headers, cam, and meth for 700? Just curious as I am planning what to do with the wife's Z51 next time she travels out of the country, lol. When she returns, she'll be asking what the whooshing sound is.
I'd like to hit 130-133 in the 1/4. Looking at the Fast List it seems I need headers. Slowest car was 129 with just a kit/headers, and the fastest without getting too crazy was 134 with headers and meth, both ECS kits.
Last edited by NoOne; Jul 18, 2015 at 06:00 PM.
Are you thinking of headers, cam, and meth for 700? Just curious as I am planning what to do with the wife's Z51 next time she travels out of the country, lol. When she returns, she'll be asking what the whooshing sound is.
Last edited by thegame; Jul 20, 2015 at 07:33 AM.

Among other obvious things I like about the C7 one of them is no doubt the traction and holding the road, I plan to do headers and an intake but as far as street driving I don't think I want to go much more. That's another reason I'm such a fan of nitrous; I can put the bottle in and go to the track and have fun, make another 150-200 hp, and when I leave I can take the bottle out and keep all the driveability, cooling, gas mileage, and reliability of a stock-ish car while I drive on the street.
I guess that post really doesn't answer your question other than this, once you go too far you will look back and wish you stopped.
Among other obvious things I like about the C7 one of them is no doubt the traction and holding the road, I plan to do headers and an intake but as far as street driving I don't think I want to go much more. That's another reason I'm such a fan of nitrous; I can put the bottle in and go to the track and have fun, make another 150-200 hp, and when I leave I can take the bottle out and keep all the driveability, cooling, gas mileage, and reliability of a stock-ish car while I drive on the street.
I guess that post really doesn't answer your question other than this, once you go too far you will look back and wish you stopped.
My old car at 620rwhp won't hold with drag radials but the C7 does.
All that being said I wouldn't let someone not used to a high hp car drive it, any car that can spin 1st and/or 2nd hard is asking for a novice to wreck it.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
The higher the HP level seems to cause people to assume less drivability, when in reality, the E92 can be made to simulate a completely stock car until boost/meth comes on at 3500 or wherever you'd like to set it.
Very cool platform, even with a big block and tons of off-idle torque. Mike has fine-tuned the first few gears for throttle response/ramp-up so that you don't just sit and spin... Wait, that's sounds wrong.

Same with the top gears - 5th through 7th are just highway gears for me, and I can make 24-25mpg without breaking a sweat (obviously without AFM or DoD, and a 416 with all the goodies as you all know). I average 10-12mpg playing in 1-4, though.

.
Last edited by Theta; Jul 20, 2015 at 04:39 PM.
The higher the HP level seems to cause people to assume less drivability, when in reality, the E92 can be made to simulate a completely stock car until boost/meth comes on at 3500 or wherever you'd like to set it.
Very cool platform, even with a big block and tons of off-idle torque. Mike has fine-tuned the first few gears for throttle response/ramp-up so that you don't just sit and spin... Wait, that's sounds wrong.

Same with the top gears - 5th through 7th are just highway gears for me, and I can make 24-25mpg without breaking a sweat (obviously without AFM or DoD, and a 416 with all the goodies as you all know). I average 10-12mpg playing in 1-4, though.

.
That is not what I wanted to hear

Sounds like headers and meth are coming...now if they could include steering wheel angle into that it would be an awesome system.
Anyway, something to hope for in the future, even though it's dangerous to start tinkering with steering rates.
First thought was with another 50ft lbs I'd have to be more careful.
So looking at angle, G's, throttle, all that stuff and predict a power map based on it. I'm sure its done at some measure.
When Chrysler was first looking at variable steering we had a test car with a **** on the dash...no real limits one way or the other but you learned to be careful how far you turned it very quickly.
The bad thing is its not expensive to do it so that makes me want to do it more.
But how much is too much from a drivability standpoint? One of my employee's really wanted to drive my car and I told him it would have to be before I put the SC on it because I was really expecting to be more like skating on ice under 40-50 mph.
I'd put anyone in the driver seat and let them drive it now. The car is so controllable and traction is great. Even in the corners you can lay into it pretty hard and it holds the road pretty well.
In Track mode PTM 2 I can go through 1st and 2nd with no wheel spin if the weather is over 70 degree's which makes the car very enjoyable to drive since you do not need to pedal it.
I swear it has more traction now than before. I'm sure I'm spinning the tires a bit but it doesn't feel like it.
Now with wanting more power how much is going to be too much where the car's power overwhelms its traction?
I had settled on getting R888's before but its perfectly fine with the ZP's and I'd take it cross country. If I add another 60-70 ft lbs of torque is it going to be like that?
If its not how far can you go? I can do headers and meth, or just headers.
I am planning for a wide body this winter, how much will those 12" wide wheels help?
For a majority of people out there (without proper driving instruction and experience), 650whp is about the top of where you feel like the car is still a daily-driver, stock-mannered C7.
Past that, they become a whole lot more fun, with the caveat that you need to be a lot more aware of everything you're doing, and making sure your supporting mods are in order. Rubber being one of the largest... Nothing worse than having the rear step out on you at 65mph goosing it on the freeway with the wrong set of tires.
I was lucky enough to be able to feel the difference between stock, tuned, tuned + bolt-ons, tuned + blot-ons + ECS @ 8psi, and finally the monster it became. It's interesting transformation for sure!
Past that, they become a whole lot more fun, with the caveat that you need to be a lot more aware of everything you're doing, and making sure your supporting mods are in order. Rubber being one of the largest... Nothing worse than having the rear step out on you at 65mph goosing it on the freeway with the wrong set of tires.
I was lucky enough to be able to feel the difference between stock, tuned, tuned + bolt-ons, tuned + blot-ons + ECS @ 8psi, and finally the monster it became. It's interesting transformation for sure!

I've had a lot of track experience in a lot of different cars so the power does not bug me too much to drive. But I don't want the power to take away from the car which is why I won't change the cam.
On my 500rwhp C5 I had a VERY slow leak on one of the bungs for the ABS block. So it would drip maybe 3-4 drops over the course of a day and puddle up.
At 80mph where it pooled it would spray on the back tire, it was fun for the week before I fixed it and scared the living crap out of anyone in the car.
It was just enough to cause the tire to slip hard for maybe 15-20 ft, wheeee

I am more interested though in seeing what can be done with the ECU. I'd say the car will take a bit more torque in 1st and 2nd, not much. Pavement needs to be pretty good, that crushed smooth stone it slips pretty hard in 1st, other than that its OK.
I'd like a little more power from where I am, then even more in 3rd/4th. Is it gear based or speed based?
Can the tune be adjusted in a way where its not full tilt unless in Track or a particular PTM mode?
How much tie in is there between PTM modes and ECU tuning?
For a majority of people out there (without proper driving instruction and experience), 650whp is about the top of where you feel like the car is still a daily-driver, stock-mannered C7.
Past that, they become a whole lot more fun, with the caveat that you need to be a lot more aware of everything you're doing, and making sure your supporting mods are in order. Rubber being one of the largest... Nothing worse than having the rear step out on you at 65mph goosing it on the freeway with the wrong set of tires.
I was lucky enough to be able to feel the difference between stock, tuned, tuned + bolt-ons, tuned + blot-ons + ECS @ 8psi, and finally the monster it became. It's interesting transformation for sure!

Last edited by dironvictorious; Jul 22, 2015 at 09:46 AM.




















