Supercharger requirements /thoughts?
Is there anyone out there running just a SC with no other mods and no issues (overheating, etc)
Also, what brand of superchargers are best these days? I read some old posts back and forth and people complaining about design of ecs intercooler and having to mess with the abs brakes. Anything to that? Now that the c7 has been out aa little whole now and people have played with them more, is there a consensus on best supercharger? What supercharger would you go with?
My first foray into superchargers and I am a total newb.
Thanks so much.
I do recommend a catch can as well as an ALKY methanol system. Without the meth you will be limited on how much boost you can run by only relying on fuel. You can maybe get by if you have 93 octane available; I wouldnt risk it on 91.
All that being said, I would probably recommend the ECS kit over the A&A. The ECS standard kit comes with a larger head unit compared to A&A and they seem to make more power and more boost when coupled with meth and long tube headers.
It all depends on your wants / needs. We WANT a reliable high HP C7. It will cost us a good chunk of change but hopefully it will satisfy our NEED for speed.. LOL!
I'm in Utah and with the higher elevations here my car is running just under a 5 second 0-60. It's still a fun car, but I want to get the numbers closer to advertised at sea level in the mid 3's.
I stopped by jdp motorsports which is local here and they were very helpful and recommended if I do the SC that I'd need a catch can and to run meth, I just want to see if there's a way to do just a SC and not have to do the other things for added cost on top and wanted to get a few opinions of people that might be running a setup like that with no ill side effects.
If I SC and keep boost lower, maybe down the line I can decide to add those other things depending on seat of the pants feel/need/times?
I do recommend a catch can as well as an ALKY methanol system. Without the meth you will be limited on how much boost you can run by only relying on fuel. You can maybe get by if you have 93 octane available; I wouldnt risk it on 91.
All that being said, I would probably recommend the ECS kit over the A&A. The ECS standard kit comes with a larger head unit compared to A&A and they seem to make more power and more boost when coupled with meth and long tube headers.
Is there anyone out there running just a SC with no other mods and no issues (overheating, etc)
Also, what brand of superchargers are best these days? I read some old posts back and forth and people complaining about design of ecs intercooler and having to mess with the abs brakes. Anything to that? Now that the c7 has been out aa little whole now and people have played with them more, is there a consensus on best supercharger? What supercharger would you go with?
My first foray into superchargers and I am a total newb.
Thanks so much.
I'm in Utah and with the higher elevations here my car is running just under a 5 second 0-60. It's still a fun car, but I want to get the numbers closer to advertised at sea level in the mid 3's.
I stopped by jdp motorsports which is local here and they were very helpful and recommended if I do the SC that I'd need a catch can and to run meth, I just want to see if there's a way to do just a SC and not have to do the other things for added cost on top and wanted to get a few opinions of people that might be running a setup like that with no ill side effects.
If I SC and keep boost lower, maybe down the line I can decide to add those other things depending on seat of the pants feel/need/times?
The beauty of these systems is the car will drive like stock until you get after it and want the power. They are very reliable and low maintenance. The last ECS system we did made 662 WHP and 567 WTQ with ARH LT's, Alky kit and a breather/catch-can.
I am working on the quote now and I will send it over shortly. Please feel free to call, email or PM me anytime with questions.

Kind regards,
Jordan Priestley
888.308.6007
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Ant
Last edited by StingerBG; Oct 15, 2015 at 10:47 AM.


I had the car tuned on 91 and ran that initially and had zero issues. I have switched to 94, but the car ran great on 91. I'm 2,300 ft above sea level.
So with the restrictor plate in, it will be fine IMO. If you want to run any more boost though you'd need meth and a breather would probably be good too. My next step next summer is to add meth and a breather and shoot for 700whp-ish.
Keep in mind you are getting information from people that may or may not have a z51 package.
Keep in mind you are getting information from people that may or may not have a z51 package.
http://www.corvette7.com/forums/showthread.php?t=364560
Post #5
Could this fix some problems that previously made people believe there a was necessity for the catch can on SC engines or is that unrelated?
Thanks for all the replies. Corvette owners are a good bunch. Met one at jds that had come down from Montana to have work done and talked with him for probably 45 minutes about our cars.
I'm trying to fit in with the nice guy corvette owner image and let a merging c7 in front of me in traffic the other day
http://www.corvette7.com/forums/showthread.php?t=364560
Post #5
Could this fix some problems that previously made people believe there a was necessity for the catch can on SC engines or is that unrelated?
Thanks for all the replies. Corvette owners are a good bunch. Met one at jds that had come down from Montana to have work done and talked with him for probably 45 minutes about our cars.
I'm trying to fit in with the nice guy corvette owner image and let a merging c7 in front of me in traffic the other day

Here's a pretty good explanation of wet sump vs dry sump.
http://www.moroso.com/eb/web/docs/WetSVSDry.pdf
All Direct Injection cars can benefit from a catch can set up. Basically what a PCV system does is re-route oil vapors back through the engine rather than out into the air which would cause more pollution. All cars, direct injection and port injection, get oil ingestion back into the system through the PCV system. Only it doesn't hurt port injection engines as much because the fuel is delivered above the valves, in which the detergents in the fuel clean the tops of the valves as it passes over them. However, in DI engines (which all LT1's are, both wet and dry sump), the fuel is sprayed in BELOW the valves, which is more of an efficient delivery for the engine however it doesn't allow for cleaning of the tops of the valves. A catch can is designed to catch those vapors and separate the oil back out of it so that it doesn't end up on top of your valves. And the clean side separator keeps the oil on the upper end from being "burped" back into the intake manifold. Granted the levels of oil ingestion may not be that high, and it may take many many miles before you start to see any "coking" of the valves, but it WILL happen. And you most likely won't really notice it as it will happen over time and slowly decrease the performance and longevity of your vehicle. Which of course, with the addition of forced induction, this all just compounds and increases. All manufacturers producing DI engine vehicles are battling this problem. And almost all of them would probably recommend (off the books) the use of a catch can (or breather system), but won't use them production wise because it is another part that will need routine maintenance and another part that would have to be EPA compliant.
Also, some people will argue the breather over catch can debate all day (one being a closed system and the other venting excess pressure into the atmosphere). Some argue the catch can can't handle the excess pressure properly while others will argue that a breather will not maintain proper crankcase pressure. This is why I'm looking at the FSP set up. To me it seems to be the best of both worlds. At least in all of my studies on this matter, that is what I have determined!
Last edited by StingerBG; Oct 15, 2015 at 01:50 PM.
Here's a pretty good explanation of wet sump vs dry sump.
http://www.moroso.com/eb/web/docs/WetSVSDry.pdf
All Direct Injection cars can benefit from a catch can set up. Basically what a PCV system does is re-route oil vapors back through the engine rather than out into the air which would cause more pollution. All cars, direct injection and port injection, get oil ingestion back into the system through the PCV system. Only it doesn't hurt port injection engines as much because the fuel is delivered above the valves, in which the detergents in the fuel clean the tops of the valves as it passes over them. However, in DI engines (which all LT1's are, both wet and dry sump), the fuel is sprayed in BELOW the valves, which is more of an efficient delivery for the engine however it doesn't allow for cleaning of the tops of the valves. A catch can is designed to catch those vapors and separate the oil back out of it so that it doesn't end up on top of your valves. And the clean side separator keeps the oil on the upper end from being "burped" back into the intake manifold. Granted the levels of oil ingestion may not be that high, and it may take many many miles before you start to see any "coking" of the valves, but it WILL happen. And you most likely won't really notice it as it will happen over time and slowly decrease the performance and longevity of your vehicle. Which of course, with the addition of forced induction, this all just compounds and increases. All manufacturers producing DI engine vehicles are battling this problem. And almost all of them would probably recommend (off the books) the use of a catch can (or breather system), but won't use them production wise because it is another part that will need routine maintenance and another part that would have to be EPA compliant.
Also, some people will argue the breather over catch can debate all day (one being a closed system and the other venting excess pressure into the atmosphere). Some argue the catch can can't handle the excess pressure properly while others will argue that a breather will not maintain proper crankcase pressure. This is why I'm looking at the FSP set up. To me it seems to be the best of both worlds. At least in all of my studies on this matter, that is what I have determined!
Very good to know! Thank you for your help.














