DSC Alignment/washers?
Not sure why your manual would say not to remove one washer.
Caster adjustment also factors in the toe link range problem. When you set caster more positive, the rear adjustment cam is set farther out and the front cam is set closer in. Since the toe link is at the rear, more positive caster makes it too short.
Why do you want -2.0 deg camber at all four corners? That sounds like too much in the rear and not enough in the front.
To measure and adjust the rear caster requires special tools. Alignment racks do not have this capability. And when you adjust rear camber, caster will change. I built my own tools and do my own alignments.
Rear caster is extremely sensitive. By that I mean small adjustments to camber can really throw off the caster. For instance, when adjusting camber, if you put in 0.2 deg of camber adjustment ( and say you do that by adjusting only one of the lower control arm cams) that will throw off the caster by about 0.6 deg. The manual is not correct in saying that one cam is for camber and the other is for caster. Both cams affect camber and caster pretty much equally from what I have experienced.
To set camber properly requires adjusting each of the two lower control arm cams and going back and forth between while also getting caster correct. It is a tremendous pain in the back side to get it right.
If you can have DSC do your alignment, they will get it right.
We did this in combination with installing Granatelli rear toe links so we could adjust the rear toe quite precisely versus the stock setup. I do not have equipment to measure rear caster so it is what it is.
Looking forward to a track day on slicks in a few weeks. That's why I wanted the extra camber.




We did this in combination with installing Granatelli rear toe links so we could adjust the rear toe quite precisely versus the stock setup. I do not have equipment to measure rear caster so it is what it is.
Looking forward to a track day on slicks in a few weeks. That's why I wanted the extra camber.
As for shims GM's recommendations on shim removal have also evolved. Originally in their Feb 2016 TSB on how to do the track alignment they recommended removing one shim from behind the UCAs at the front of both the Z06 and the Z51 in the rear they only recommended removing a shim from behind the UCAs on the Z51. Once I got in there I noticed the Z06 only came with one shim in the rear. I and others have wondered why GM didn't recommend removing all shims and we suspect they don't want the UCA dog bones directly mounted against the aluminum frame. Recent info from GM indicates they don't want any shims removed when setting the track alignment.
Bill
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
We did this in combination with installing Granatelli rear toe links so we could adjust the rear toe quite precisely versus the stock setup. I do not have equipment to measure rear caster so it is what it is.
Looking forward to a track day on slicks in a few weeks. That's why I wanted the extra camber.
Apparently they thought 0.5mm negative toe was a good thing at one time. It actually felt surprisingly good to drive, but since I have access to the equipment I'll change it next week.
2" long x 1/4" diameter steel pins inserted into suspension knuckle arm
Digital Torpedo Level
Last edited by RacerRik; Aug 8, 2020 at 10:07 PM.
Measuring is easy, just make sure the car is on level ground. Keep in mind you are measuring precise angles.
My garage floor slopes 0.6 degrees towards the door, so when I measure my caster, I have to account for that slope. For example, to get positive 0.7 degrees caster angle, I need to actually set my caster angle to positive 0.13 degrees when measured on that garage floor.
Adjusting the caster is the opposite of easy!
Last edited by RacerRik; Aug 8, 2020 at 10:58 PM.
http://vi.raptor.ebaydesc.com/ws/eBa...=1596976386964
Cut the heads off of two 1/4 inch bolts. I drilled two holes in the one side = to the distance the holes in the upright are apart. Put the bolts in this plate using a nut on each side so I have the solid shank portion of the bolts sticking out. I stick them in the holes on the upright and use a magnetic angle finder like this.
https://www.lewiscontractorsales.com...8697b248804b0f




Measuring is easy, just make sure the car is on level ground. Keep in mind you are measuring precise angles.
My garage floor slopes 0.6 degrees towards the door, so when I measure my caster, I have to account for that slope. For example, to get positive 0.7 degrees caster angle, I need to actually set my caster angle to positive 0.13 degrees when measured on that garage floor.
Adjusting the caster is the opposite of easy!
Bill
The later change to 0.5mm toe IN was really based on the ZR1 with much firmer shocks and springs. There is less compression so that extra 1.0mm is not needed. They ultimately decided to use toe IN as their published setting because toe-in adds stability. For most drivers on the street that stability is desirable. DSC's position has not changed, they like the slight toe OUT on cars like mine with softer springs because there will be more compression. FYI I have a Z51 that we did a full GS/Z06 body conversion, but I still have the softer Z51 springs.
Those of you with the Z07 package probably would not want to use toe out on the street. Z07 has a much higher spring rate.
My car doesn't get more than 1,000 miles a year on the street. Tire life is not really an issue. My desires are optimum handling on the track with Pirelli slicks, hence the large camber I selected. I find the car extremely stable on the street even with the toe OUT. When you turn into a corner it really grabs. I like it. After discussing my needs he recommended I stay with the toe OUT. It isn't much remember we're only talking about 0.5mm. Most tire shops doing an alignment aren't adjusting to that level of precision anyway.
By the way my digital level and 1/4" diameter pins arrived from amazon today. Gonna tackle the rear caster tomorrow. I understand how to measure it. How is rear caster actually adjusted?
The bottom line is that there is not just one optimum spec. Everything is a compromise.
Last edited by Citation; Aug 11, 2020 at 10:43 PM.
You need to tighten the cam bolts to say about 20 ft-lbs to prevent them from slipping while you are adjusting things.
Don't forget to tighten them fully when you have it just right. And then double check your final angles after torquing the bolts to 125 ft-lbs to make sure they did not slip while final tightening.
So lets say you need 0.2 degrees more positive caster and you need less negative camber, that means the control arm needs to go inwards, so you would adjust the front cam inwards. The ratio from my experience is that you get about three times as much change in caster as you get in camber. So if you go 0.3 degrees more caster moving one cam, you get about 0.1 degree of camber change. It is a bear to get both angles where you want them, but you can get there if you don't get frustrated and call it quits.
There are four cases so I will describe each case:
1) If you need more pos caster and less neg camber - adjust the front lower control arm cam inwards.
2) If you need more pos caster and more neg camber - adjust the rear lower control arm cam outwards.
3) If you need less pos caster and less neg camber - adjust the rear lower control arm cam inwards.
4) If you need less pos caster and more neg camber - adjust the front lower control arm cam outwards.
Which digital level did you get? I just ordered a new one because my Craftsman Digital Torpedo level was not really accurate enough. I ordered a Digi-Pas DWL280PRO. I hope that one is more accurate. It has 0.05 degree resolution which should be sufficient and the accuracy is specified at 0.05 degree near zero / 90 and 0.1 deg for other angles. I built a test fixture and found my Craftsman level was only good to about 0.3 degrees accuracy and it is not very repeatable.











