When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm sure it will if there was a lot of moving air but isn't there only so much moisture in air and once the cap is closed, where is the fresh air coming from with moisture? Now if you are talking about your boat at the Marina, I agree. If we go with a 20 gallon tank, whether it is 5 gallons full or 15, how much more water will you get that is going to be significant? If I get a gallon of water after it sits for 4 months, I'd be crapping my pants but if it is 3 drops more, probably not. So my question is, how much more water will you be able to get with the cap on tight and the fuel system not exposed to fresh air?
It's almost a percent, but you'll also see condensation from more air volume as well. The issue isn't separation of the fuel caused by water, it is the corrosiveness of water contamination in fuel. That water content is what will be run in the engine, and into the oil. If you are storing a vehicle low on a tank there is more air volume to contaminate the fuel versus if the tank were full.
If you use higher octane fuel than your car "needs", it will actually deliver less power. Higher octane fuel has less power in it. The reason you need high octane fuel is to stop detonation, high octane fuel is less volatile so it doesn't explode in the cylinder rather than burn.
The gas company want you to purchase the highest octane fuel they have,,,,,,, super dooper fuel. SUPER expensive fuel.
WRONG!
Raising the octane rating (also known as the anti-knock index) doesn't change the energy content of a gallon of gasoline. A higher octane rating indicates greater resistance to knock, the early combustion of the fuel-air mixture that causes cylinder pressure to spike.
When higher-octane fuel is flowing through its injectors, the engine controller can take advantage of the elevated knock threshold and dial in more aggressive timing and {on supercharged vehicles} higher boost pressures to improve performance.
That's exactly what I said. If your car needs 97 octane,,,,, for what ever reason, going to 100 octane isn't going to increase the power output. If your car needs higher octane because of higher boost, then it needs it, going above that number isn't helpful. If your car is pulling back the timing at high throttle, then you NEED higher octane.
2. I’ll save you some time, read the third paragraph in the Introduction and if you are still interested spend some time on the entire article. By the way, I was told this tidbit by a chemical engineer I worked with at GE in the 1980’s and he had the math to prove it! This article is enough for me: https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...59431104002042
It is not very smart to quote an article without understanding the article.
Your entire premise falls apart when these salient points are brought to light.
1) the test was undertaken in Turkey, with European gasoline, and the study does not appear to be peer-reviewed.
2) In that study, the effect of higher-octane gasoline on the performance and exhaust emissions was studied using the carburetor gasoline engine.
3) In that study the additives used to increase octane number also influence the emissions. For instance, a study [14] confirms that the tetra alkyl lead in gasoline . . .
4) That chemical engineer you worked was at GE, not at an auto manufacturer, and not a fuels & lubricants researcher, and it's a long way from the 1980’s!
The engine fuels and combustion additives made for older carbureated engines are can show much different results than would be observed in a modern computer controlled fuel injected engine. Citing results from a study almost 20yrs old is questionable at best.
Last edited by fnbrowning; Mar 4, 2024 at 03:50 PM.
That's exactly what I said. If your car needs 97 octane,,,,, for what ever reason, going to 100 octane isn't going to increase the power output. If your car needs higher octane because of higher boost, then it needs it, going above that number isn't helpful. If your car is pulling back the timing at high throttle, then you NEED higher octane.
The guy at Holley who did my tune showed me on the printout where my car was knocking and pulling back. This kept him from fully optimizing the ignition advance. To quote him" ...wow, you have a lot of knock retard throughout the whole log, and you really shouldn't... Not using Shell gas are ya??.. you're using GOOD 93 octane in there right??? Make sure you are using GOOD 91/93 octane gas, it makes a difference... mobil, exxon, sunoco, amoco, bp, chevron are best brands to use, with mobil and exxon being the best.... NEVER use Shell, walmart/sams club/bj's, mom-n-pop, or no-name brands, as it's crap gas/additives that tends to cause a lot of knock retard and less performance/mpg..."
Last edited by Blackwater0323; Mar 4, 2024 at 03:41 PM.
Reason: add
That's exactly what I said. If your car needs 97 octane,,,,, for what ever reason, going to 100 octane isn't going to increase the power output. If your car needs higher octane because of higher boost, then it needs it, going above that number isn't helpful. If your car is pulling back the timing at high throttle, then you NEED higher octane.
NO, you actually wrote "Higher octane fuel has less power in it." and that is incorrect.
Also incorrect is your statement regarding 100 octane. Such a blanket statement cannot take into account the apparent density altitude and engine load the ECM is seeing. It has been observed often that an engine is pulling timing on hot track days at high loads. If a higher octane gasoline is substituted, knock will be retarded, and the engine controller can take advantage of the elevated knock threshold and dial in more aggressive timing. This almost always shows increased power output.
Higher octane fuel in fact does have less power. If your car needs 85 octane and you put 100 octane in it,,,,,, the engine will deliver less power. It is less volatile, it is harder to ignite. That's the point of higher octane.
When higher-octane fuel is flowing through its injectors, the engine controller can take advantage of the elevated knock threshold and dial in more aggressive timing and {on supercharged vehicles} higher boost pressures to improve performance.
To a point, yes. That said, just because I can get 120 octane doesn't mean 5he ECM has settings for that. I would think it is only set up for pump gas which is up to 95 but go ask a programmer.
Higher octane fuel in fact does have less power. If your car needs 85 octane and you put 100 octane in it,,,,,, the engine will deliver less power. It is less volatile, it is harder to ignite. That's the point of higher octane.
To a point, yes. That said, just because I can get 120 octane doesn't mean 5he ECM has settings for that. I would think it is only set up for pump gas which is up to 95 but go ask a programmer.
Octane in your tank and ignition timing on the ECU can be correlated, but they are not directly causational. Ignition will retard due to knock sensor feedback. It will not retard due to knowledge of the octane present in the fuel. Because it has no knowledge.
An ECU can use flex fuel sensors to adjust tables based on alcohol content, but there isn't an octane sensor.
An engine only needs enough octane to prevent detonation; if it's tuned for 91-octane pump gas and has a slight ping on a hot day, filling up with 118-octane race fuel won't add crazy horsepower.
An engine only needs enough octane to prevent detonation; if it's tuned for 91-octane pump gas and has a slight ping on a hot day, filling up with 118-octane race fuel won't add crazy horsepower.
Ok, so will you redact your statement that increasing octane leads to less power?
I will say it again............... IF your car is pinging,,,(detonating),,,,, it NEEDS higher octane.
That's a different statement than the one @fnbrowning and I are contesting.
See your own statement here:
Higher octane fuel in fact does have less power. If your car needs 85 octane and you put 100 octane in it,,,,,, the engine will deliver less power. It is less volatile, it is harder to ignite. That's the point of higher octane.
It is not very smart to quote an article without understanding the article.
Your entire premise falls apart when these salient points are brought to light.
1) the test was undertaken in Turkey, with European gasoline, and the study does not appear to be peer-reviewed.
2) In that study, the effect of higher-octane gasoline on the performance and exhaust emissions was studied using the carburetor gasoline engine.
3) In that study the additives used to increase octane number also influence the emissions. For instance, a study [14] confirms that the tetra alkyl lead in gasoline . . .
4) That chemical engineer you worked was at GE, not at an auto manufacturer, and not a fuels & lubricants researcher, and it's a long way from the 1980’s!
The engine fuels and combustion additives made for older carbureated engines are can show much different results than would be observed in a modern computer controlled fuel injected engine. Citing results from a study almost 20yrs old is questionable at best.
Well, that plus the study conflated octane with flame-speed. You cannot determine one from the other.
Exactly. If your car only needs 85 octane,,,,, "to not detonate",,,,,, putting 100 octane in it, WILL NOT, deliver more power. The point of higher octane fuel is so it wont detonate.
Exactly. If your car only needs 85 octane,,,,, "to not detonate",,,,,, putting 100 octane in it, WILL NOT, deliver more power. The point of higher octane fuel is so it wont detonate.
You keep changing your statement, so I'm starting to wonder if you are maybe just not proofreading. Take a moment to read this statement you posted:
If your car needs 85 octane and you put 100 octane in it,,,,,, the engine will deliver less power
To us it sounds like you are suggesting that the car makes less power on 100 octane than it makes on 85 octane. Maybe that's not what you meant to type?
Exactly. If your car only needs 85 octane,,,,, "to not detonate",,,,,, putting 100 octane in it, WILL NOT, deliver more power. The point of higher octane fuel is so it wont detonate.
You're dancing around trying to be "right" when you don't understand the physics. And stop using your straw argument "crazy horsepower." You will not receive debate points by arguing the exaggeration.
In point of fact it is possible for a high-performance automobile to see detonation at certain altitudes, temperatures/relative humidity levels that would not show detonation otherwise. The ECM will dial in knock retard, and that will equal a loss of power. Conversely, injecting your referenced 100 octane fuel will retard knock and in the absence of a knock imput, the engine controller can take advantage of the elevated knock threshold and increase the timing in a more aggressive manner to the limits of the internal timing tables. This almost always shows increased power output. Not a lot, but measurable, as seen in the that same August 2019 Car and Driver article I referenced.