LT4 timing?




Were you able to log your IATs?
The gains where immediately noticeable, the car felt quite a bit stronger, and also quite a bit louder in track mode.
the first thing I noticed, prior to Halltech, I was able to get decent traction in 1st...post halltech, my tires just spin, so it requires a little more finness. So the 40-60hp gains were validated for me.
however, I did notice that sometimes in gear 3 and on, there may be a slight reduction of power. I remember that even if I was in gear 5 or 6 , I would be astounded at how much pickup it had even if I was way too high in the gears. Post halltech, sometimes those same 5/6 gear pull feel a tad slower, maybe.
Just to be clear, the halltech is awesome, and Im not 100% sure if what Im feeling is correct.
So I setup a time to have a dyno session at aacorvette to run different scenarios on the car, and check for kr and any sort of funny business in the timings.
If Andy says its good post test, than great, otherwise maybe the car needs a tune...
Maybe your experiencing the same thing? One thing I also noticed, is that the couple people who have been doing the quarter aren't gaining as much as one would think from those sort of gains... on the other hand the wheelspin could be a factor, really hard to say
Ill report my findings...
Last edited by JonaOhana; Oct 12, 2015 at 01:31 AM.
The gains where immediately noticeable, the car felt quite a bit stronger, and also quite a bit louder in track mode.
the first thing I noticed, prior to Halltech, I was able to get decent traction in 1st...post halltech, my tires just spin, so it requires a little more finness. So the 40-60hp gains were validated for me.
however, I did notice that sometimes in gear 3 and on, there may be a slight reduction of power. I remember that even if I was in gear 5 or 6 , I would be astounded at how much pickup it had even if I was way too high in the gears. Post halltech, sometimes those same 5/6 gear pull feel a tad slower, maybe.
Just to be clear, the halltech is awesome, and Im not 100% sure if what Im feeling is correct.
So I setup a time to have a dyno session at aacorvette to run different scenarios on the car, and check for kr and any sort of funny business in the timings.
If Andy says its good post test, than great, otherwise maybe the car needs a tune...
Maybe your experiencing the same thing? One thing I also noticed, is that the couple people who have been doing the quarter aren't gaining as much as one would think from those sort of gains... on the other hand the wheelspin could be a factor, really hard to say
Ill report my findings...
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I hope there is an easy way other wise the only other factory quick way would be to re-flash a stock tune with the dealer tool which would suck.
Last edited by rflow306; Oct 12, 2015 at 10:42 AM.
Dumb question, but what does the cylinder air mass represent on the left? I notice that the timing number continues to go down. This is what I was watching during my run as well.
A Tech II will not work on the Z06. Beginning in 2014 GM is now using the GDS2/MDI platform which can be accessed through laptops/PC without a handheld scan tool.
Thanks!




Both have scanning capability but as long as you don't modify the tune it won't raise any warranty red flags with GM. All GM is concerned about is whether you've ever written to the PCM and don't care how many times it's been read or scanned.
FYI we have a thread going now on HPT site that you may be interested in following;
http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showth...Question-Knock
HT
Last edited by RoketRdr; Oct 12, 2015 at 11:34 AM.
You should be happy that the computer has the sensors and safeguards in place to protect your expensive engine from going "Kaboom". I know I am happy that the ECM/PCM is engineered that way.
New Slogan: "KNOCK SHOULD BE STOPPED".
Last edited by C7/Z06 Man; Oct 12, 2015 at 12:17 PM.















