Tune required
At least on the 2 or 3 ZO's I have played with and all the other GM ECM controlled cars over the years.
The PCM can correct up to 25%. It wont even throw a code for high or low fuel trims until it gets above 7% correction factors in the LTFTs maybe more.
If you think about it the PCM compensates all the time by its nature. That's it's job. If you take the car to Pikes peak, it runs all day without codes or running lean. You take it to the Bonneville salt flats, it runs all day without setting codes or running rich. Anyone think the addition of a filter or a CAI is going to get outside of the swing from Bonneville to Pikes peak?
No it wont, but folks will argue to the cows come home.
Is a tune good? Absolutely.
Is it mandatory for minor mods? Absolutely not.
However I would recommend an AFR verification with a scan and data log anytime you do any mod. But with a filter change or CAI from any reputable company I wouldn't be concerned. If the computer cant compensate it will tell you within a few miles of driving the car.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts






Best,
Gene
Your "personal" tune is still in the history of last 10, unless you flashed 10 legit tunes. So you can run home and reflash the stock tune, but that doesn't hide it entirely.
Your "personal" tune is still in the history of last 10, unless you flashed 10 legit tunes. So you can run home and reflash the stock tune, but that doesn't hide it entirely.
I just flashed a tune on mine yesterday for the first time, setting my own warranty fuse so to speak. I let the dealership know in advance what and why I was doing it, for what that might be worth (nothing or everything, I don't know).
I -think- the onus is on GM to establish that what you did caused the failure. I could accurately argue that the change I made was unrelated to the failure, but GM has more and better lawyers and deeper pockets than me. They could stonewall and decline until I was an old man.
I just flashed a tune on mine yesterday for the first time, setting my own warranty fuse so to speak. I let the dealership know in advance what and why I was doing it, for what that might be worth (nothing or everything, I don't know).
I -think- the onus is on GM to establish that what you did caused the failure. I could accurately argue that the change I made was unrelated to the failure, but GM has more and better lawyers and deeper pockets than me. They could stonewall and decline until I was an old man.
I still tune my cars while the salesman is showing me how to use Bluetooth though.
I should generate and print out a delta of the change I made (it's only one bit). Can't hurt to document in advance. May not help either, but...
For posterity, and to timestamp it, here's my delta!
Last edited by davepl; Jun 24, 2017 at 03:50 PM.
from the manufacturer, the tunes are pretty much the same whether your in Tampa, New York, Colorado, or LA. The tune has to pass in different states and at different elevations.
In the stock tune, I can pretty much expect about four degrees of Knock at 4400-4800 RPMs with an AFR at WOT in the high 11s. That the norm, and that's why you are paying to get fixed.
Shops are different, but I don't like to remote calibrate a FI or NO2 vehicle if no wideband is connected. To much can happen to fast. I like those to be in real time because to much can happen to fast.
Changing the air intake and adding headers most likely wont cause you a driving issue, but youll throw a couple codes because of relation the cat. Nothing crazy to address, but it needs it or your remote starter wont work.
I do see GM's point
www.TampaTuning.com
Last edited by Tampa Tuning; Jun 25, 2017 at 08:24 AM.











