Chassis Mount Wing! For the tract rats!!! Look inside!!
#1
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: Westminster California
Posts: 2,557
Received 329 Likes
on
225 Posts
Chassis Mount Wing! For the track rats!!! Look inside!!
Don't flame me, I know this is not for everyone. This is good for the track guys I'm making these parts for. 3D scanned and rendered on the computer. Chassis base will be done next week. Wing/airfoil is based off the Gallardo Super Trofeo.
03/01
Introduction Pricing is set at $2700 shipped to 48 states, carbon spoiler delete included.
Carbon stands/legs will be additional.
Final revision to the stands. Thicker 3/8th” and less cout outs, cross stabilizing bar is now up above the Corvette flag and just under the 3rd brake light. Way more stable.
Also, airfoil is moved 3” forward from the prototype for a more pleasing look. Just above the top of the bumper.
Attachment 48354093
Attachment 48354155
Attachment 48354156
Attachment 48354157
Ok the lift so I snapped a couple of pics showing off the chassis mount wing.
Attachment 48352567
Attachment 48352568
Large end plates on seemed to be way more stable and damn good looking
Attachment 48354092
Attachment 48354158
Attachment 48354159
Production is underway. Possibly slightly thicker legs and legs cutout.
Attachment 48354178
Attachment 48354179
Attachment 48354180
Attachment 48354181
Attachment 48354182
Attachment 48354183
Final number is 20” exactly on the inside of the legs. Looks much more proportionate vs 15” or so from other makers.
Bumper slots cut and it’s relatively easy to do with the given measurements.
Attachment 48354284
Attachment 48354285
Attachment 48354286
Attachment 48354264
Attachment 48354287
Attachment 48354288
Tikt wing brackets are lined up to the tail lights. Reason why they are so close together are due to the limited space back there. I calculated it to be just 15” apart. Too close to my liking.
By moving the legs down toward the bottom of the upper bumper, I have more space to move the legs wider apart to 22”, right up to the taillights.
I think it’s spreads the downforce more evenly across the wing and also more pleasing to the eyes to look at when viewed directly from the back.
As far as pricing, it should be less half of TIKT. Finalizing the pricing with my carbon maker and fabricator this coming week.
02/14 UPDATE
So it’s ready for production. 3D scanning of the Airfoil resulted good numbers according to the fabricator. 10 to 1 ratio on downforce to drag. At 120 mpg, it should produce about 300 lbs of downforce at the high setting. This is great number considering that is at 120 mph and only calculated from the Airfoil alone. Off to powdercoating matte black. Will have option for carbon external legs in the future also. Stabilizing beam will be much thinner than this prototype showed.
Batch of 10 will be produced in the initial batch.
White dots on the airfoil were for 3D data scanning and calculation.
Attachment 48354321
03/01
Introduction Pricing is set at $2700 shipped to 48 states, carbon spoiler delete included.
Carbon stands/legs will be additional.
Final revision to the stands. Thicker 3/8th” and less cout outs, cross stabilizing bar is now up above the Corvette flag and just under the 3rd brake light. Way more stable.
Also, airfoil is moved 3” forward from the prototype for a more pleasing look. Just above the top of the bumper.
Attachment 48354093
Attachment 48354155
Attachment 48354156
Attachment 48354157
Ok the lift so I snapped a couple of pics showing off the chassis mount wing.
Attachment 48352567
Attachment 48352568
Large end plates on seemed to be way more stable and damn good looking
Attachment 48354092
Attachment 48354158
Attachment 48354159
Production is underway. Possibly slightly thicker legs and legs cutout.
Attachment 48354178
Attachment 48354179
Attachment 48354180
Attachment 48354181
Attachment 48354182
Attachment 48354183
Final number is 20” exactly on the inside of the legs. Looks much more proportionate vs 15” or so from other makers.
Bumper slots cut and it’s relatively easy to do with the given measurements.
Attachment 48354284
Attachment 48354285
Attachment 48354286
Attachment 48354264
Attachment 48354287
Attachment 48354288
By moving the legs down toward the bottom of the upper bumper, I have more space to move the legs wider apart to 22”, right up to the taillights.
I think it’s spreads the downforce more evenly across the wing and also more pleasing to the eyes to look at when viewed directly from the back.
As far as pricing, it should be less half of TIKT. Finalizing the pricing with my carbon maker and fabricator this coming week.
02/14 UPDATE
So it’s ready for production. 3D scanning of the Airfoil resulted good numbers according to the fabricator. 10 to 1 ratio on downforce to drag. At 120 mpg, it should produce about 300 lbs of downforce at the high setting. This is great number considering that is at 120 mph and only calculated from the Airfoil alone. Off to powdercoating matte black. Will have option for carbon external legs in the future also. Stabilizing beam will be much thinner than this prototype showed.
Batch of 10 will be produced in the initial batch.
White dots on the airfoil were for 3D data scanning and calculation.
Attachment 48354321
Last edited by Deity.Motorsports; 05-18-2018 at 02:10 AM. Reason: Spelling in title
#2
Melting Slicks
I like it.
#5
Pro
You need to develop a flat or flatter plate to cover up the mounting holes in the rear facia where the factory spoiler mounts. Leaving it in place will have a significant negative impact on the performance of the wing.
#7
Pro
#8
You should have the brackets mount to the top of the wing, not the bottom. Loose a lot of downforce mounting the way it is.
#13
Drifting
#14
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: Westminster California
Posts: 2,557
Received 329 Likes
on
225 Posts
By moving the legs down toward the bottom of the upper bumper, I have more space to move the legs wider apart to 22”, right up to the taillights.
I think it’s spreads the downforce more evenly across the wing and also more pleasing to the eyes to look at when viewed directly from the back.
As far as pricing, it should be less half of TIKT. Finalizing the pricing with my carbon maker and fabricator this coming week.
#15
Race Director
Looks like it should work well. Good job.
The following users liked this post:
Deity.Motorsports (02-13-2018)
#16
Looks nice, but I'm wondering, can someone ruin your day and easily steal the top wing if you park the car out of sight somewhere?
#17
Safety Car
One request, PLEASE consider offering a composite wing as well as a carbon one. I have a hard time justifying carbon in most applications on a street car due to cost/benefit. I'd be a buyer for composite, probably not for carbon. Many of us who track see our cars and car components as tools, not cosmetic enhancements. We don't do car shows or cruise in's and as such are not caught up in the carbon craze. The weight differential of carbon over composite will not justify the additional cost.
Rick
Last edited by rikhek; 02-13-2018 at 10:10 AM.
The following 5 users liked this post by rikhek:
JHEBERT (07-10-2018),
LagunaSecaZ06 (02-13-2018),
lobsterroboto (02-28-2018),
Mike.D (09-07-2018),
redzone (02-13-2018)
#19
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: Westminster California
Posts: 2,557
Received 329 Likes
on
225 Posts
Looks promising and you guys are really working on some cutting edge stuff.
One request, PLEASE consider offering a composite wing as well as a carbon one. I have a hard time justifying carbon in most applications on a street car due to cost/benefit. I'd be a buyer for composite, probably not for carbon. Many of us who track see our cars and car components as tools, not cosmetic enhancements. We don't do car shows or cruise in's and as such are not caught up in the carbon craze. The weight differential of carbon over composite will not justify the additional cost.
Rick
One request, PLEASE consider offering a composite wing as well as a carbon one. I have a hard time justifying carbon in most applications on a street car due to cost/benefit. I'd be a buyer for composite, probably not for carbon. Many of us who track see our cars and car components as tools, not cosmetic enhancements. We don't do car shows or cruise in's and as such are not caught up in the carbon craze. The weight differential of carbon over composite will not justify the additional cost.
Rick
#20
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas Georgia
Posts: 2,787
Received 594 Likes
on
408 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (track prepared)
C3 of Year Winner (track prepared) 2019
What is GM doing differently in being able to keep their rear wing mounting so much more discrete?
If the GM wing becomes available, and reasonably priced, I would buy it in a heartbeat (assuming it can be adapted to the Z06). Based on how their mount looks, what is to keep someone from making this a removable section, leaving next to no trace of the wing for when you are not on track. Some simple body colored plugs could then bolt/snap in place and you would basically not even know you have a rear wing.... If I were trying to develop a wing, this is the approach I would take but what do I know.
That said, I do like what you guys are doing, just would rather it be less noticeable for when the wing is not mounted, a/k/a the rear vertical plates that stick through the rear bumper.
If the GM wing becomes available, and reasonably priced, I would buy it in a heartbeat (assuming it can be adapted to the Z06). Based on how their mount looks, what is to keep someone from making this a removable section, leaving next to no trace of the wing for when you are not on track. Some simple body colored plugs could then bolt/snap in place and you would basically not even know you have a rear wing.... If I were trying to develop a wing, this is the approach I would take but what do I know.
That said, I do like what you guys are doing, just would rather it be less noticeable for when the wing is not mounted, a/k/a the rear vertical plates that stick through the rear bumper.
Last edited by fleming23; 02-13-2018 at 03:22 PM.