When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
In my head the rwhp is where I was like how is it doing that on e50 & stock injectors if you have seen them run out Below 800 even with 30% injectors.
still learning & asking not arguing just fyi.
do you think those mods/ numbers sound legit?
E70 without meth was my example. Also it depends on the pulley because there is a high demand on fuel on the hit when you have a more aggressive pulley. Fuel pressure can tank down low but be fine up top. Injector duty is not exactly linear in some setups. This client wanted to run pump E and not mix and the pumps in his area are E70-E82. On E70 with meth, he had injector room left for cold weather and more E content. But WITHOUT meth, the injectors wouldn't have been enough in this setup. It was close but not safe.
It's also hard to judge or answer questions about HP the way you're asking. Dyno's read differently so one shop may say 800 is the limit but another may say 850 is the limit. Then if you get a completely different type of dyno they may say 750 is the limit. So these numbers are a ballpark. You have to judge by the datalogs, injector and fuel system data and leave room for cold weather and variations in ethanol content(unless you're going to mix to a specific value every time). In cold weather on the LT4, fuel demands go up quite a bit due to increased cold weather boost pressure. So if you're on the edge of the system in the summer, when winter comes around and temps drop, you will be over the edge.
Not if you're trying to run high blends of ethanol. I have a client with a cammed ZL1 (38% lobe), low side and 30% injectors running E70. But we needed meth to get past 800rwhp. I imagine we could have stretched some on 93 but its just too hard to maintain power, keep spark in it and not heat up the blower trying to run 93 pump and no meth.
If you're not going to run Meth you need to run at least E50 to get these cars to make consistent power. E50 gives you 90% of the benefits of E so in reality targeting E55 with fuel mods will get you the most power for the money. Beyond E50 you gain more cooling efficiency in the combustion chamber which is beneficial when you spin the stock blower hard and don't use any meth.
is that with a ported blower headers etc?
Im starting to feel like these LT4’s are weak 5k into a hellcat and you got 900 crank
Im starting to feel like these LT4’s are weak 5k into a hellcat and you got 900 crank
thats also a 4400 lb brick that wont hook. the lt4 isnt a weak motor at all. its the epa that has stunted the motor with dod /afm bull. do the internals proper and you end up with a ls style motor thats makes big power. the fueling is the part that so expensive to deal with . port injection cures that
thats also a 4400 lb brick that wont hook. the lt4 isnt a weak motor at all. its the epa that has stunted the motor with dod /afm bull. do the internals proper and you end up with a ls style motor thats makes big power. the fueling is the part that so expensive to deal with . port injection cures that
He's just on here trolling. We already know don't need 900 crank to walk a 900 crank Hellcat
thats also a 4400 lb brick that wont hook. the lt4 isnt a weak motor at all. its the epa that has stunted the motor with dod /afm bull. do the internals proper and you end up with a ls style motor thats makes big power. the fueling is the part that so expensive to deal with . port injection cures that
I’ve read that port injection is 10k? im semi unfamiliar with the LT4 platform & that’s what brings me here over & over. To learn & converse.
why would I be trolling? Im dead serious regardless of which is faster we were speaking specifically about COMBUSTION ENGINES & it’s capabilities.
hellcat people give a nod to corvette’s but you corvette guys look for any reason to put down the hellcat.
personally I feel the two cars are incomparable however as for the motors I’d beg to differ.
an 800 crank hp hellcat is walking an 800hp C7Z DEFINITELY on top end.
aerodynamics are in the hellcat “charger’s” favor. Top end and gearing also.
The C7Z would get left within its 5th gear!
Have you you ever raced an 800 Crank HP Z06 that DOESN'T have stage 3 aero and is a manual instead of the awful 8 speed auto? I'd put money on it the M7 Z06 would walk away up top.
I disagree the Charger is more aerodynamic, but I will say, Z06/Z07 cars with stage 3 aero really suffer on the top end due to the drag. If you're roll racing it easy to take all of that off. Then if we talk about weight, the Charger is easily1000 lbs heavier. That's a lot of weight to make up for vs the Z06. Nobody on here started trashing Hellcats, you came on here trashing Z06's on a Corvette Forum. So you indeed are the troll and all of the sudden are saying we are talking trash about the Hellcat? Get outta here with that garbage.
Originally Posted by SRTZ06$
I’ve read that port injection is 10k? im semi unfamiliar with the LT4 platform & that’s what brings me here over & over. To learn & converse.
More like $3000. Not sure what you've been reading.....
Have you you ever raced an 800 Crank HP Z06 that DOESN'T have stage 3 aero and is a manual instead of the awful 8 speed auto? I'd put money on it the M7 Z06 would walk away up top.
I disagree the Charger is more aerodynamic, but I will say, Z06/Z07 cars with stage 3 aero really suffer on the top end due to the drag. If you're roll racing it easy to take all of that off. Then if we talk about weight, the Charger is easily1000 lbs heavier. That's a lot of weight to make up for vs the Z06. Nobody on here started trashing Hellcats, you came on here trashing Z06's on a Corvette Forum. So you indeed are the troll and all of the sudden are saying we are talking trash about the Hellcat? Get outta here with that garbage.
More like $3000. Not sure what you've been reading.....
the Crawford setup with a motec ecu was easily close to 10k$. Now there are better options
exactly, he replied like I said something imaginary.
not at all. theres simply new players in the game now. toohighpsi has a complete setup for just about 3k$ based on what in sectors you choose. 1500 for the reflex II ecu 750 for the port plates and rails then you need in sectors.
dsx is in the process of building a port in section setup that will run about the same cost. the hardware for the fueling is the easy part. finding the right tuner who understands the integration of the additional 8 injectors and how to and when to fire them is the hard part. when the cars were just simple injectors e85 was easy. with direct injection it becomes much harder to integrate the new fuel in a seamless manner
not at all. theres simply new players in the game now. toohighpsi has a complete setup for just about 3k$ based on what in sectors you choose. 1500 for the reflex II ecu 750 for the port plates and rails then you need in sectors.
dsx is in the process of building a port in section setup that will run about the same cost. the hardware for the fueling is the easy part. finding the right tuner who understands the integration of the additional 8 injectors and how to and when to fire them is the hard part. when the cars were just simple injectors e85 was easy. with direct injection it becomes much harder to integrate the new fuel in a seamless manner
I think im gonna go do some research on this. I’ve honestly been leaning towards and LT5 swap.
E70 without meth was my example. Also it depends on the pulley because there is a high demand on fuel on the hit when you have a more aggressive pulley. Fuel pressure can tank down low but be fine up top. Injector duty is not exactly linear in some setups. This client wanted to run pump E and not mix and the pumps in his area are E70-E82. On E70 with meth, he had injector room left for cold weather and more E content. But WITHOUT meth, the injectors wouldn't have been enough in this setup. It was close but not safe.
It's also hard to judge or answer questions about HP the way you're asking. Dyno's read differently so one shop may say 800 is the limit but another may say 850 is the limit. Then if you get a completely different type of dyno they may say 750 is the limit. So these numbers are a ballpark. You have to judge by the datalogs, injector and fuel system data and leave room for cold weather and variations in ethanol content(unless you're going to mix to a specific value every time). In cold weather on the LT4, fuel demands go up quite a bit due to increased cold weather boost pressure. So if you're on the edge of the system in the summer, when winter comes around and temps drop, you will be over the edge.
Well the car in question has Stock size blower pulley (2.55), and a 18% over drive Crank (9.5").
also most roots cars i have seen make more Torque, then sometimes they don't. and This one makes 825rwhp / 739rwtq. seems like a big spread on Tq. not sure where that comes from. It was a On a Mainline Dyno (Bolts to hubs.)
Well the car in question has Stock size blower pulley (2.55), and a 18% over drive Crank (9.5").
also most roots cars i have seen make more Torque, then sometimes they don't. and This one makes 825rwhp / 739rwtq. seems like a big spread on Tq. not sure where that comes from. It was a On a Mainline Dyno (Bolts to hubs.)
It depends on the blower and pulley combo. This car had a race port blower(not advertised to the general public by the two porters that do it) and a pulley combo pushing 18-19 PSI. Stock LT4 high side, stock LT4 injectors, 38% fuel lobe and a bunch of meth. We've since redone the setup to XDI 30 over injectors, bigger cam, ported heads, and a built bottom end with higher compression. Then we lowered the boost to about 16psi but the car is flowing the same or more air. Car runs on E80 and meth with plenty of injector room for cold cold weather where it will see 2 psi more.
The torque number depends on the pulleys and then the HP depends on the ported blower, intake, TB, cam and heads. This cam makes more HP than torque.
My only point is that the numbers you read about or are reported are ballpark figures depending on the setup. The car above would probably survive on E50-E60 and no meth, but the owner wants to run pump E which is between 68-82% in his area. And yes, depending on the dyno, the numbers reported can vary widely. I'm definitely not here to say what you can and cannot do. Just giving an example from my experience.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.