And so it begins, C8 twin turbo kit at ECS
#141
Team Owner
#142
Premium Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Providing the most proven supercharger kits for your C5/6/7 609-752-0321
Posts: 23,325
Received 1,093 Likes
on
659 Posts
#143
https://www.litchfieldmotors.com/nis...anifold-turbo/
Last edited by chuntington101; 01-09-2021 at 06:29 AM.
The following users liked this post:
DOUG @ ECS (01-11-2021)
#144
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Clouds Over California
Posts: 6,872
Received 444 Likes
on
240 Posts
From our testing and research, it seems that a stepped log design is good to about the 1000 hp mark, we plan to also make a cast stainless manifold that will be for the higher HP builds but it will allow us to do back to back testing. From there we will decide if we are going to have two set ups or just focus on one.
nothing wrong with stepped log if don’t right (conical is better though)! See the below link for some interesting info. Also easier to cast in stainless / inconnel!
https://www.litchfieldmotors.com/nis...anifold-turbo/
https://www.litchfieldmotors.com/nis...anifold-turbo/
Last edited by Shinobi'sZ; 01-11-2021 at 04:04 PM.
#145
No need and never said there was anything wrong with a stepped log, it is just not as good as a header with merge at the flange...proven design in endurance racing over all else. However all of my turbo diesels whether it be a Navstar or Duramax use logs and they will last 100k's of miles.
The bad bad thing about a header design will be heat! It could turn the engine compartment into an oven really easily! Logs tend to be less hot as they tend to be 1) thicker material, 2) significantly less surface area, 3) more compact / more space between important bits & 4) easier to insulate.
Obviously you can make a header system work but if you want a crack free design that’s as durable as f*ck you really can’t beat a log design.
The following users liked this post:
Shinobi'sZ (01-13-2021)
#146
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Clouds Over California
Posts: 6,872
Received 444 Likes
on
240 Posts
If you look at the link I posted and read the ‘Design’ page they go into a lot of detail around the different designs tested before coming up with the chosen one. Seems some F1 teams are using similar designs as well now (guessing more to do with packaging than anything).
The bad bad thing about a header design will be heat! It could turn the engine compartment into an oven really easily! Logs tend to be less hot as they tend to be 1) thicker material, 2) significantly less surface area, 3) more compact / more space between important bits & 4) easier to insulate.
Obviously you can make a header system work but if you want a crack free design that’s as durable as f*ck you really can’t beat a log design.
The bad bad thing about a header design will be heat! It could turn the engine compartment into an oven really easily! Logs tend to be less hot as they tend to be 1) thicker material, 2) significantly less surface area, 3) more compact / more space between important bits & 4) easier to insulate.
Obviously you can make a header system work but if you want a crack free design that’s as durable as f*ck you really can’t beat a log design.
Logs do create heat and hot spots which can lead to other thing like warping and different effects with exhaust pulses as they combine pulses along the log before exiting. That's the disadvantage to them really. I think Doug has pointed out that another option might be pursued in the future for higher hp applications, obviously a log manifold that is capable of 1000hp, saves space, and is easier to mitigate heat is a very attractive option. But there are engineering facts and engineering opinions, engineering fact is a log manifold is not as efficient or as good as a lt header merge collector, if it were it would be used in endurance racing, but it's not. Engineering opinion is that a stepped log is likely the best design for the C8 given the engine compartment and surrounding space.
Last edited by Shinobi'sZ; 01-13-2021 at 12:59 PM.
#147
@Shinobi'sZ totally agree that a equal length header with a proper collector is the best solution in terms of flow and overall performance. However haven’t seen many ‘kits’ that use them in the V8 world.
Even the import guys guys tend to run collectors with very steep angles between runners and short collectors. Maybe less of an issue compared to NA though (hotter and fender exhaust gas flows differently???)?
Even the import guys guys tend to run collectors with very steep angles between runners and short collectors. Maybe less of an issue compared to NA though (hotter and fender exhaust gas flows differently???)?
#152
Team Owner
#153
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,477
Received 4,389 Likes
on
2,075 Posts
Will you be driving at Max power for minutes at a time?
What will you be doing with the car?
#154
Premium Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Providing the most proven supercharger kits for your C5/6/7 609-752-0321
Posts: 23,325
Received 1,093 Likes
on
659 Posts
So it's just a painstaking waiting game at the moment. We plan on making a supercharger kit as well, but we stopped going forward until the TT kit is sellable. No point in having two FI kits we can't sell.
The following users liked this post:
blue_bomber697 (01-19-2021)
#155
Team Owner
Others are doing that, the youtube crowd is just winging it, but we are a manufacturer and unless we are going to sell it that way in masses, which I do not see many people being OK with their new car not passing inspection, then we will not waste our time in that direction.
So it's just a painstaking waiting game at the moment. We plan on making a supercharger kit as well, but we stopped going forward until the TT kit is sellable. No point in having two FI kits we can't sell.
So it's just a painstaking waiting game at the moment. We plan on making a supercharger kit as well, but we stopped going forward until the TT kit is sellable. No point in having two FI kits we can't sell.
Then again I don't have to worry about emissions or any of that.
They did finally crack the Siemens ECU though but I haven't followed that much because the JB4 works so well.
#156
occasional quarter mile runs at the strip. But I am in Louisiana swamp heat and humidity. Past superchargers needed cool down times between passes.
#157
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,477
Received 4,389 Likes
on
2,075 Posts
one of the disadvantages of a blower is they produce more heat for the same power to the crank as the blower requires HP to drive the blower.
#158
Doug.......so your saying your kit will definitely fit in the C8 HTC ? Have you installed one in a HTC yet? How much more difficult is the install vs. the coupe?
Thanks!!!
Last edited by Raven911; 01-23-2021 at 07:55 AM.
#159
Premium Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Providing the most proven supercharger kits for your C5/6/7 609-752-0321
Posts: 23,325
Received 1,093 Likes
on
659 Posts
Yes it will fit, we didn't design the kit by sticking turbo's in there and seeing what fit, this is a 100% engineered CAD drawn kit that was completely designed before we even had the car.
The following users liked this post:
schpenxel (01-28-2021)
#160
Racer
Member Since: Jun 2019
Location: Fairhaven, mi/Hutchinson Is, Fl
Posts: 306
Received 187 Likes
on
91 Posts
can this much work , money, effort, unreliabilty, warranty voiding and all the rest possibly be worth it??? what are you going to gain? is there an true upside? who are you going to "beat"... and do you get paid for that?
where can you use quicker that 3.0 seconds to 60 mph... or higher big end than 185 ish?
if you really want something quicker for some reason... shouldnt you just buy a real race car for 1/2 the money... and not ruin a beautiful corvette?
just askin....
The following users liked this post:
Racer86 (01-26-2021)