Any insight regarding LT2 power increase over LT1 ?
#1
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Port Arthur, Texas 77642
Posts: 8,475
Received 331 Likes
on
241 Posts
Any insight regarding LT2 power increase over LT1 ?
I haven't seen anything posted regarding components / changes contributing to the power increase over LT1. The new exhaust headers, intake manifold, air cleaner assembly along with more precise (aggressive) tuning could accomplish an increase from 460 hp to 490 hp (495 HP with Z51 specific exhaust). Is the LT2 engine block Corvette specific to accomodate ME layout OR is the 6.2 block shared with LT1? Has GM shared any information on the LT2 beyond HP & TQ?
If I missed a post addressing this info please advise.
If I missed a post addressing this info please advise.
#2
Safety Car
You did not miss anything, the answer will come soon for sure.
The following users liked this post:
JadeRaven (07-25-2019)
The following users liked this post:
FringbirdAloha (07-22-2019)
#5
Le Mans Master
The straighter intake runners are about all that would be necessary to make "that" much more HP.
Remember the height limitations of the C7 bonnet, well, those are gone with the engine behind the driver.
So instead of folding the runners under the bonnet, you just stick them straight up and the air flow faster and straighter.
Remember the height limitations of the C7 bonnet, well, those are gone with the engine behind the driver.
So instead of folding the runners under the bonnet, you just stick them straight up and the air flow faster and straighter.
The following 2 users liked this post by MitchAlsup:
NemesisC5 (07-23-2019),
tail_lights (07-24-2019)
#6
Race Director
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,120
Received 2,054 Likes
on
1,306 Posts
The following users liked this post:
Kent1999 (07-24-2019)
#7
Le Mans Master
We ever learn what the second timing chain was for?
and yes, straighter runners = more power. Look at what they were doing with the old cross rams, straightest shot possible.
and yes, straighter runners = more power. Look at what they were doing with the old cross rams, straightest shot possible.
#8
The second chain is for another scavenge pump for the oil system located in the v according to Car and Driver. Tadge stated during the reveal that there were 3 scavenge pumps on the system.
#9
Burning Brakes
Could that second chain be a part of the relocated dry-sump system?
Last edited by Quinten33; 07-22-2019 at 11:48 PM.
#10
Le Mans Master
I was surprised that after six years, they didn't do more to the LT1 to make it an LT2. More exhaust lift, better flowing intake and exhaust, and they called it a day. I think their goal was 495 HP, and they weren't going to spend a dime more than they had to to get there.
I was expecting they would go well over 500 HP with new heads, new pistons, new cam, and a bump in the redline. Certainly with new CFD software, they could get more flow through the heads.
I was expecting they would go well over 500 HP with new heads, new pistons, new cam, and a bump in the redline. Certainly with new CFD software, they could get more flow through the heads.
#11
Melting Slicks
I was surprised that after six years, they didn't do more to the LT1 to make it an LT2. More exhaust lift, better flowing intake and exhaust, and they called it a day. I think their goal was 495 HP, and they weren't going to spend a dime more than they had to to get there.
I was expecting they would go well over 500 HP with new heads, new pistons, new cam, and a bump in the redline. Certainly with new CFD software, they could get more flow through the heads.
I was expecting they would go well over 500 HP with new heads, new pistons, new cam, and a bump in the redline. Certainly with new CFD software, they could get more flow through the heads.
The following users liked this post:
PRE-Z06 (07-23-2019)
#12
Le Mans Master
Ay what point are they just chasing bigger numbers? If the performance is there, why do they need 550 hp out of the base vehicle? There will likely be two further models with higher horsepower if that's what you need. As it is it is the second quickest corvette of all time in some respects.
I'm just saying that I believe their goal was 495 at the cheapest possible cost.
#13
Melting Slicks
I would say you are jumping the gun and assuming the performance won't be there with 495hp, even though the one metric we have been given is outstanding.
#14
Moderator
And don't forget the under 60k metric. The engine is the most expensive part of a car. They saved a lot with the LT2 with only minor changes.
#15
Le Mans Master
#16
Drifting
I was surprised that after six years, they didn't do more to the LT1 to make it an LT2. More exhaust lift, better flowing intake and exhaust, and they called it a day. I think their goal was 495 HP, and they weren't going to spend a dime more than they had to to get there.
I was expecting they would go well over 500 HP with new heads, new pistons, new cam, and a bump in the redline. Certainly with new CFD software, they could get more flow through the heads.
I was expecting they would go well over 500 HP with new heads, new pistons, new cam, and a bump in the redline. Certainly with new CFD software, they could get more flow through the heads.
That said, if they were happy with the performance already, then the ROI may not have been there to go for more in the base car in order to keep development costs down. The LT1 heads may not have much low hanging fruit that's feasible for mass production, since it was also designed using advanced cfd tools not that long ago.
Last edited by CPhelps; 07-23-2019 at 08:29 AM.
#18
Safety Car
This is how they got the base car just under $60k, they basically reused the engine. Given the weight increase I think the power to weight is similar to C7. From 30 mph up it will probably accelerate the same.
The following users liked this post:
JadeRaven (07-25-2019)
#19
Le Mans Master
That said, if they were happy with the performance already, then the ROI may not have been there to go for more in the base car in order to keep development costs down. The LT1 heads may not have much low hanging fruit that's feasible for mass production, since it was also designed using advanced cfd tools not that long ago.
#20
Race Director
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,120
Received 2,054 Likes
on
1,306 Posts
You don’t think it’ll run like a bolt-on C7 since it essentially has better intake/exhaust? Anyone heard cd numbers yet or how the frontal area compares?
Last edited by PRE-Z06; 07-23-2019 at 08:06 PM.