Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The REAL reason for C8 understeer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2019, 10:06 PM
  #61  
AgCorvette
Instructor
 
AgCorvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Walnut Creek CA
Posts: 212
Received 72 Likes on 38 Posts

Default

I also think that the understeer was intentionally baked in by GM as a safety measure. I don't fault GM for doing this. I don't have any experience with a mid engine car, but from what I have read, the ME configuration reduces the polar moment of inertia, which means when the car does start to spin, it will be harder to for the driver to catch. Assuming that is a true statement, then I believe GM did the right thing. If people don't like it, they can buy another car or adjust the suspension or perhaps wait for the higher performing corvette models that will be coming out the the future. I currently have a 2005 C6 which I've had since it was new, and I've enjoyed auto crossing it. It's been a lot of fun learning how to control that car. I look forward to doing the same when I get a C8 hopefully in 2021. If I ever get to the point, that I think the car is holding me back (doubtful), then I will look into adjusting the suspension. I'm sure I will get years and years of enjoyment out of it before that happens though.

Old 10-22-2019, 10:28 PM
  #62  
kdm123
Pro
 
kdm123's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 628
Received 92 Likes on 63 Posts

Default

If GM purposefully made the car understeer heavily for safety purposes, them I'm surprised. Stability control on modern cars is pretty sophisticated.
Old 10-22-2019, 10:34 PM
  #63  
Michael A
Le Mans Master
 
Michael A's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 9,763
Received 2,965 Likes on 1,387 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kdm123
If GM purposefully made the car understeer heavily for safety purposes, them I'm surprised. Stability control on modern cars is pretty sophisticated.
Stability control doesn't change the laws of physics.

Everyone should be happy it understeers. We wouldn't be able to afford the insurance if it didn't.
The following users liked this post:
Phil1098 (10-22-2019)
Old 10-22-2019, 10:40 PM
  #64  
cv67
Team Owner
 
cv67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes on 2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05

Default

I dont follow all these threads how do we know for a fact it understeers? Somethings gotta give at some point when you get past a g.
Id love to see these new cars with no nannies at all...put the fun factor back in.
Old 10-22-2019, 10:52 PM
  #65  
AgCorvette
Instructor
 
AgCorvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Walnut Creek CA
Posts: 212
Received 72 Likes on 38 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cuisinartvette
I dont follow all these threads how do we know for a fact it understeers? Somethings gotta give at some point when you get past a g.
Id love to see these new cars with no nannies at all...put the fun factor back in.
The magazine's have been reporting it understeers.
There is nothing to prevent you from turning off the various electronic nannies.
On my C6, I generally only do that when I am auto crossing, but that is my choice, others are free to do as they see fit
Old 10-23-2019, 06:59 PM
  #66  
Purple92
Melting Slicks
 
Purple92's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,539
Received 788 Likes on 543 Posts

Default

I'm not aware of ANY new car you can buy today that is not going to Understeer at neutral or maintenance throttle - at the LIMIT. The real question is where does the understeer get to be problematic - is it at 80% of max grip or 97% of max grip, and what is that Max Grip level...

As several previous posts have stated - the C6, C7 & now the C8 are more than capable of cornering at over 1g (heck the C4 was the first one to hit the 1G mark - and that was back in 1984). Not very many people have the skill / guts to push their car to those levels, specially on the street - and GM is well aware of that.

So - let's talk about why mid engine (and by that I mean engine behind passenger compartment) cars can turn faster laps than cars with the engine mounted up front. Part of the "magic" is that you have more load on the rear wheels as you accelerate out of a corner. If you look at the weight distribution - the rear wheels are probably going to have more than 50% of the static weight distribution, and when you accelerate - you shift weight backward - so even more load goes on the rear tires. Now - there are some things engineers can do with suspension geometry to help the situation even further under acceleration, but the fact is that as you come out of a corner there will be more weight on the rear tires (this might just be one reason why almost all the mid engine cars out there run wider rear rubber than front rubber). Now let's think about the lower polar moment of inertia - basically that means that less force will be required to change the car's momentum (read direction). So - the talented drivers will be able to apply power sooner, and will be able to apply more power at a given point int he corner exit than with a car that has the engine in the front. They will also need to use less total front tire angle to generate the required force to change direction...

Bottom line - the reviews do say the C8 understeers. That's FAR from a surprise !!! The degree of understeering that's being reported seems to be varying depending on which review you read. Also perfectly understandable - some car reviewers are probably far less skilled drivers than others, and some reviewers were probably expecting the same tuning in the base C8, as they see in a McLaren that sells for 8 time the price of a base C8 Coupe. Sorry guys - different market !!! The guys who work on suspension calibrations all day know that the customers who really want hardcore handling are probably going to be waiting for the Z06 (or better) to be released. Many of the people who say they want a Z51 package really don't want those kinds of spring rates or those nice hard suspension bushings, and the engineers know that as well.

Oh - just one last thing. Cornering force (in G's) is proportional the the Square of the velocity. (The equation is that G Force = Velocity ^2 / (14.97 * r) {where r is the radius in feet}. So - say you toodle through an off ramp at 50 MPH and generate 0.5 G. Go in 20 MPH hotter and you're now at just a hair under 1G.

Last edited by Purple92; 10-23-2019 at 07:43 PM.
Old 10-23-2019, 07:08 PM
  #67  
meadowz06
Race Director
 
meadowz06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: birmingham Alabama
Posts: 15,530
Received 966 Likes on 573 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09 and '13

Default

Originally Posted by Phil1098
Understeer means the front ends pushes or plows, easy to see with a front wheel drive car. Neutral means both ends let go at the same time and never provided any warning you were near the limit. You don't want oversteer because when it lets go you slide off rear end first. Old 911 Porsches were known for trailing throttle oversteer. Which means the driver missed his brake point, said oh **** I'm going too fast, turns the wheel and gets off the gas unloading the rear of the car and off the road he goes back end first.

Understeer is always the safety net of OK bub, your just about done, better back off if you don't want to crash.
Bingo. From a guy who knows his stuff. Great post.
Old 11-06-2019, 08:53 PM
  #68  
NormTurnbullJr
2nd Gear
 
NormTurnbullJr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2017
Posts: 2
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Your reply is spot on

Originally Posted by Racer X
This is correct, when a car is understeering, the common reaction is to lift throttle and apply brakes, both of which improves the situation by reducing G forces and putting more weight on the front tires increasing grip, causing you to turn in as desired.

On a Oversteering car, the reaction is the same the result is terrible. Lifting throttle only shifts weight off the rear tires reducing grip making it oversteer more (known as lift throttle oversteer) Appling the brakes does the same thing less grip at the rear increasing the over steer, more grip at the front, so the front turns in harder and the back lets go, Now you are spinning with the tires pointed in the wrong direct to correct for the skid. So the correct thing for a mass produced car is to deliver it with an alignment and tire specs that understeers. The trackers know they need to adjust the alignment and tire pressures.
Before I got my C7, I used to autocross a mid-engine Toyota MR2. In my early days I spun out twice at 80 mph. I had to learn to do exactly what you describe for the reasons you describe. The MR2 would severely oversteer even more in a hard turn because the rear wheel(s) had a tendency to toe-out. To correct that I toed the rear wheels in a little bit. It wasn't ideal for tire wear and it still oversteered (but more predictably) if I would lift the throttle and hit the brake (like you describe) but once I learned to respond to the oversteer as you describe, the car was a blast to drive and got super fast times on the track. It is definitely a paradigm shift to learn to autocross a car with more mass (weight) in the back but the fun is well worth it (as long as you don't drive the car at the limits on the streets where you could endanger property and lives). Autocrossing is a great place to learn what to do if someone cuts in front of you on the street and you need to control your car to avoid an accident.



Quick Reply: The REAL reason for C8 understeer



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 PM.