Is 911 S this much faster than the C8
#41
https://www.motortrend.com/cars/chev...n-test-review/
This pretty much covers it with numerical values for their respective acceleration rates with professionals conducting the tests.
C8: 0-60 in 2.8 seconds, 1/4 mile in 11.1 seconds.
911S 0-60 in 2.9 seconds, 1/4 mile in 11.2 seconds.
This is about as close as it can get.
Google will provide you with more test results if you need to see replication of these metrics but if this type of verifiable, reproducible, results don't work for you then there is always YouTube good ole boy videos.
This pretty much covers it with numerical values for their respective acceleration rates with professionals conducting the tests.
C8: 0-60 in 2.8 seconds, 1/4 mile in 11.1 seconds.
911S 0-60 in 2.9 seconds, 1/4 mile in 11.2 seconds.
This is about as close as it can get.
Google will provide you with more test results if you need to see replication of these metrics but if this type of verifiable, reproducible, results don't work for you then there is always YouTube good ole boy videos.
Seems accurate to me!!!!
#42
I don’t care I still like my C8 better than a 911s....Same goes for my Lotus Evora 400
#43
Team Owner
The following users liked this post:
charliebrown2 (09-22-2020)
#44
But honestly, if i had to pick out of those 3 cars, i actually would get the C8. And i LOVE porsche.
I just feel like, if it's a turbo s, NO corvette can touch that car. Not a C6ZR, not a C7Z, not a C7ZR, not a callaway C7Z etc. The turbo s is too much car, too much power, too much tech, too much refinement, it's too sophisticated.
Hopefully GM will make the high performance variant C8's like that.
#45
Racer
Edmonds was not able to get sub 3 seconds even with factoring in roll out. 3.4 seconds real world 0-60 and 3.2 seconds with rollout factored in. I find it hard to believe that the C8 is a 2.7-2.9 second car and the 911 is that much faster.
https://youtu.be/2zk_rPFnzKQ
https://youtu.be/2zk_rPFnzKQ
#46
Again folks. The 992 Carrera S IS NOT A 443hp car. Its not even a 443WHP car. Whether Porsche learned to trick dynos into lower numbers is up for debate as well. I couldn't give a accurate hp number either, BUT IT ISNT A 443hp car. There is no magic going on either. The car makes WAY more hp than advertised.
The following 4 users liked this post by New car dude:
#47
Again folks. The 992 Carrera S IS NOT A 443hp car. Its not even a 443WHP car. Whether Porsche learned to trick dynos into lower numbers is up for debate as well. I couldn't give a accurate hp number either, BUT IT ISNT A 443hp car. There is no magic going on either. The car makes WAY more hp than advertised.
The new 992 gen 911 turbo s with 640hp will annihilate a C7Z.
Porsche just have the smartest engineers lollzzz
#48
I can watch this video from 0:20 over and over and over and over again.
Nothing beats this car lol.
Nothing beats this car lol.
The following 3 users liked this post by Z0HS1CK:
#49
Banned Scam/Spammer
The following users liked this post:
TARANTULA (09-21-2020)
#50
Banned Scam/Spammer
Common sense helps if you have it but in your case just keep believing those fictional numbers. I guess since you believe MT you also believe the 560rwhp dyno number they published for a stock C8.
Real life shows on numerous occassions the slower car on paper beating the faster car on paper. Most of us know what is going on. You just keep getting your facts from the PDR. If it showed 0.5s you would believe that too.
Real life shows on numerous occassions the slower car on paper beating the faster car on paper. Most of us know what is going on. You just keep getting your facts from the PDR. If it showed 0.5s you would believe that too.
MT, C&D, RT, General Motors, according to "Sprayer" are all liars. Interesting that they are all lying to virtually an identical degree. This is a perplexing coincidence indeed. So there you have it men, all the numbers we have been fed over the last year for the C8 are lies and fabrications according to "Sprayer". Good that we have a guy like him to keep it straight.
Just one question for our resident expert here on automotive press chicanery, are all the acceleration metrics reported by these sources for the 911S all fake news and lies or are they legit?
Can't wait for his response to this one.
The following users liked this post:
rudolph schenker (09-24-2020)
#51
Well OK then, we have it confirmed now. No doubt about it coming from you. The auto press reports "fictional numbers".
MT, C&D, RT, General Motors, according to "Sprayer" are all liars. Interesting that they are all lying to virtually an identical degree. This is a perplexing coincidence indeed. So there you have it men, all the numbers we have been fed over the last year for the C8 are lies and fabrications according to "Sprayer". Good that we have a guy like him to keep it straight.
Just one question for our resident expert here on automotive press chicanery, are all the acceleration metrics reported by these sources for the 911S all fake news and lies or are they legit?
Can't wait for his response to this one.
MT, C&D, RT, General Motors, according to "Sprayer" are all liars. Interesting that they are all lying to virtually an identical degree. This is a perplexing coincidence indeed. So there you have it men, all the numbers we have been fed over the last year for the C8 are lies and fabrications according to "Sprayer". Good that we have a guy like him to keep it straight.
Just one question for our resident expert here on automotive press chicanery, are all the acceleration metrics reported by these sources for the 911S all fake news and lies or are they legit?
Can't wait for his response to this one.
#52
Banned Scam/Spammer
#53
Last report from c/d against cayman GT4, C8 did 3.0 sec to 60 mph (0.3 sec 1ft rollout)
#54
I'm actually surprised you value anything the 3 stooges (well it's actually the 5 or 6 stooges) that post in this section daily. You're better off going to a dumpster and talking to a random bag of trash there, you'd get the same results lolllzzzz
Btw, did you check out the posts this afternoon? Remember when i said they all come and post at the same time? It's like they all live together!! LMMMAAOOOOOOOLOLLLZLZZZZZZ
Btw, did you check out the posts this afternoon? Remember when i said they all come and post at the same time? It's like they all live together!! LMMMAAOOOOOOOLOLLLZLZZZZZZ
#55
Drifting
I can watch this video from 0:20 over and over and over and over again.
Nothing beats this car lol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-qNOrlYT7Y
Nothing beats this car lol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-qNOrlYT7Y
#56
Folks, ask yourselves are all Carrera S 992 models created equal? I think not, and Motortrends car was BEFORE Porsche began turning up the boost at the factory before sending the cars out. Its been done before people, and it could have been done in response to Motortrends article. Lightning lap is the real test of sports car prowess, and rest assured the C8 will be up for the challenge.
#57
Melting Slicks
I'm actually surprised you value anything the 3 stooges (well it's actually the 5 or 6 stooges) that post in this section daily. You're better off going to a dumpster and talking to a random bag of trash there, you'd get the same results lolllzzzz
Btw, did you check out the posts this afternoon? Remember when i said they all come and post at the same time? It's like they all live together!! LMMMAAOOOOOOOLOLLLZLZZZZZZ
Btw, did you check out the posts this afternoon? Remember when i said they all come and post at the same time? It's like they all live together!! LMMMAAOOOOOOOLOLLLZLZZZZZZ
I couldn’t help but laugh when I read this post. Loved the analogy!
The following users liked this post:
Z0HS1CK (09-22-2020)
#58
It amazes me how many are bent on speeds, quarter mile times and such. I didn't buy my 911 Turbo because it's quick, it's just a fantastic machine to drive on curvy roads or even on a trip at the speed limit. If I buy a C8 when they are available, it won't be for that reason either. If you want fast, buy electric, they are in their infancy and will only get quicker.
The following users liked this post:
C82LT (09-22-2020)
#59
Race Director
The porsche crew on corvette forum again and they have what they consider proof to tout how wonderful the new Carrera is.
i tend to stick to the science.... 2.8 corvette acceleration to 60. Porsche carrera quite a bit slower....
amateur videos not withstanding. Remember porsche winning the acceleration shootout is contradictory to logical and rational thought....but if it occurs in a youtube video ? Thats being held up as proof?
no offense but thats easy to doctor up...
dont get me wrong i dig the Carrera . Many many froends have them and they are great cars...but zero to sixty? Zero to 80? Nope..... Maybe...zero to 100 ..lthat I believe...
both iconic...
I actually believe the standard carrera versus the c8 z51 is more logical than the carrera S...
id suggest the 90 grand c8 z06 to do track battle with the carerra S makes more sense.
i tend to stick to the science.... 2.8 corvette acceleration to 60. Porsche carrera quite a bit slower....
amateur videos not withstanding. Remember porsche winning the acceleration shootout is contradictory to logical and rational thought....but if it occurs in a youtube video ? Thats being held up as proof?
no offense but thats easy to doctor up...
dont get me wrong i dig the Carrera . Many many froends have them and they are great cars...but zero to sixty? Zero to 80? Nope..... Maybe...zero to 100 ..lthat I believe...
both iconic...
I actually believe the standard carrera versus the c8 z51 is more logical than the carrera S...
id suggest the 90 grand c8 z06 to do track battle with the carerra S makes more sense.
Last edited by JerriVette; 09-21-2020 at 10:40 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by JerriVette:
Blue Curvette (09-21-2020),
Telepierre (09-22-2020)
#60
Le Mans Master
Not sure if Edmonds texted the newest 911 S (I know they did the turbo which was 2.6 seconds).