When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'd be up for a first-year car. Hopefully they can make the car and it's engines in enough volume to take advantage of economies of scale. My friend has a fully optioned all-stock '13 Shelby GT500 (5.8 DOHC supercharged), and it stickered for far less than my '13 427 vert - not exactly an apples-to-apples comparison but makes you wonder what the possibilities are considering there were 4,885 GT500s built in '13, which was the first year for the 5.8 DOHC IIRC. The base price difference between the Boss 302 based car and the GT500 was about $13,400 in 2013.
Last edited by pickleseimer; Dec 28, 2017 at 09:52 PM.
Reason: clarification
Question. Will the NA LT1 receive the LT5's dual injection updates?
I doubt it, because with it being NA and a mild engine build, it can only burn so much fuel and the stock configuration seems to have plenty of fueling capacity to feed it.
GM's biggest concern is corporate average mpg, IMO! To get a more energy efficient engine, it needs to be a double overhead cam that can vary intake and exhaust timing independently. Probably have 4 valves per cylinder.
Then they can meet the EPA mpg fixed driving path and when max power is used (not part of the required EPA mpg test) those two turbo's provide the power. Turbo's also capture some of that wasted energy going out the exhaust.
Maybe it will be a truck engine as well! They have to improve gas mileage too!
Then they should go to solenoid operated valves... the benefits are huge, lighter, more fuel efficient, cleaner. AND more compact. See Koenigsegg electric valves
Then they should go to solenoid operated valves... the benefits are huge, lighter, more fuel efficient, cleaner. AND more compact. See Koenigsegg electric valves
Also, with electric valves, a driver could select the typical low revving / high torque engine operational profile (using 2 of 4 vales per cylinder, etc...) OR select a high revving profile (using all 4 valves) with a higher red-line, etc...
Also, with electric valves, a driver could select the typical low revving / high torque engine operational profile (using 2 of 4 vales per cylinder, etc...) OR select a high revving profile (using all 4 valves) with a higher red-line, etc...
And release in a very limited run, new tech like this is perfect!
GM's biggest concern is corporate average mpg, IMO! To get a more energy efficient engine, it needs to be a double overhead cam that can vary intake and exhaust timing independently. Probably have 4 valves per cylinder.
Then they can meet the EPA mpg fixed driving path and when max power is used (not part of the required EPA mpg test) those two turbo's provide the power. Turbo's also capture some of that wasted energy going out the exhaust.
Maybe it will be a truck engine as well! They have to improve gas mileage too!
IMO, Jerry U is spot on here. CAFE compliance means turbocharged smaller displacement engines, and Corvette probably won't be an exception. Will be interesting to see if/how AFM works with turbocharging. Also, IMO, solenoid-actuated valves are a long way away for GM.
As predicted there is no way this double overhead cam Twin Turbo V8 could fit in a front engine Vette! Might be only 4 Liters! But heck, Ford gets 567 hp out of a 3.5 Liter engine used in the GT! GM is smarter and can squeeze a few more from a V8!
The FordGT gets more HP... and GM being smarter? That’s debatable.
The Forgt GT is going to sell in tiny numbers compared to the ME. Look at that pathetic fuel economy of the Ford, e.g., 14 MPG combined. Ford can put up with that due to its tiny sales rate.
True, while some Corvette owners care less about MPG, especially on the distorted world of those who post on forums compared to the total purchasing group, in the real world with many driving their Corvettes long distances, others use them as DD commuters, and similar GM will need to do in this area (CAFE), and will do much better in this area.
More importantly to many, the Ford GT’s exhaust sound is not acceptable to many Corvette owners, whereas the ME’s exhaust will sound so much better.
Lastly, I am not impressed using the Ford GT as a benchmark for our ME’s, especially the they Ford’s having a V-6. As lately confirmed, ME’s twin-turbo, 32V, V-8 is what we are getting.
I give the Ford GT’s Power Plant a “B.” GM’s ME motor will rock in comparison.
The ME will be produced in very limited numbers alongside the front engine C7 until it retires and front engine C8 takes its place.
ME will have exclusivity of 5.5 DOHC FI powerplant.
Front engine C8 will have the smaller DOHC NA powerplant as standard equipment providing increase in power and fuel efficiency (CAFE). Forced Induction will power upper tier model(s). 5.5 DOHC NA motor possibly slotted for ZO6 and Z28.
The FordGT gets more HP... and GM being smarter? That’s debatable.
Yep I misquoted the GT. With only 3.5 Liters it gets 647 hp! Actually at least the GM marketing team is smarter! No way they would let engineering say 647 hp. They would surly tell them to go back and find 3 more hp!
"...where dealing with "issues" is easier." Still going to be the neighborhood GM service department. Nothing in my experience with same would suggest a one-off would be handled any better than one-in-a-million, in terms of vehicle production numbers.
Exactly, while there might be a slow roll out of the ME as is typical of a new generation Corvette, the ME is not GM envisioned as a limited production vehicle (the opposite of how the ZR1 was/is envisioned). That does not mean that the top-of-the-line ZORA won’t be limited, just that the “entry model” will be made in whatever numbers customers are buying.