When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The C7 Z51 was run on MPSS OEM tires as they run all of their timed laps. They do add race seats and harnesses, but don't play games with the tires etc.
Z51, not GS... the GS ran a 7:26 thereabouts and is faster than the 911S at the time.
So for twice the money the 911S is 12 seconds slower.
That is a seriously bad statement about Porsche, gotta love that German engineering!
I guess the 911 boys don't care about "Ring" times either.
Wow, thee almighty 911S costs at least twice as much as a Corvette GS and can only manage to edge a GS by a second or so in an event that takes almost 8 minutes, sorry to the statisticians here but that is a tie.
This is testimonial to and another perfect example of what a terrible value Porsche is. Pay double the money for the same performance, bend over fanboys!
It's also a Porsche conducted test... so who knows the games played. I for one doubt that time, since an independent test of the 991 Turbo S resulted in a 7:34.
It's also a Porsche conducted test... so who knows the games played. I for one doubt that time, since an independent test of the 991 Turbo S resulted in a 7:34.
It also wasn't "double the money".
You are correct. Some guys buy the GS for less than half the price of the 911S. Good point.
Wow, thee almighty 911S costs at least twice as much as a Corvette GS and can only manage to edge a GS by a second or so in an event that takes almost 8 minutes, sorry to the statisticians here but that is a tie.
This is testimonial to and another perfect example of what a terrible value Porsche is. Pay double the money for the same performance, bend over fanboys!
Good thing that the ring times are irrelevant and no one cares about them, right
Good thing that the ring times are irrelevant and no one cares about them, right
"Ring" times don't mean anything to me.
The statistics posted above for 911S are not much of an endorsement.
Doesn't seem as if the Porsche faithful care about "Ring" times either, maybe they just ignore them.I guess somebody cares, seems like a number of guys here do.
The NSX is the Harvard business case study on why the C8 will be a $60K base car.
As Doug Demuro pointed out, it could be because there is nothing really at an Acura dealership that excites people. Only a bunch of SUVs and a restyled sedan. Acura is not missing it’s intended market, when the 2005 NSX was 90k, and if you adjust for inflation, the NSX of today cost about as much as the NSX of the 90s. However, just like the NSX of the 90s was positioned to go after the 328 during development, they had to set their sights on the 348. When the NSX came out, it did what it was supposed to do, however, by 1995 the 348 was replaced by the 355, THE 355. The NSX languished unchanged.
The current NSX benchmarked the Ferrari 458, but due to a long gestation, it came out when the 458 was replaced by the 488, and now that platform has been giving a lifeline in the form of the F8.
Yet, the NSX really is the performance bargain, it provides a hybrid experience much like the Porsche 918 Spyder, and it’s performance numbers are on par with the 991 Turbo/S.
Whatever the reasons people aren't lining up to buy a $200k Acura... the fact remains that the failure of the car is the reason we're going to have a $60K C8.
FWIW, I've seen more McLarens in the wilds of Michigan than I have NSXs. I can't in good faith use the NSX as a case study for anything regarding success or failure in the auto world.
Huh? The car is a complete flop from a sales/marketing perspective. You can learn a ton from Acura's long drawn out gestation of the car, changing the core power-train of the car and starting over right as it was about to be ready etc. etc.
FWIW, I've seen more McLarens in the wilds of Michigan than I have NSXs. I can't in good faith use the NSX as a case study for anything regarding success or failure in the auto world.
We usually get two NSX a gold (don't ask) & a black at our Cars & Coffee. They are out numbered by Ferrari, McLaren & Aston Martin. Acura is now "renting out" is NSX line for a limited run hand assembled special edition $50K TLX sedan
Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; May 1, 2019 at 05:26 PM.
I think there is a huge "it depends" there. What was Acura's goal? Was it to sell a ton of them? Surely not, they knew it wouldn't sell like hotcakes at that price point. But if they were positioning it as a brand statement in terms of what they could do, they did that pretty well. Whether or not it is worth it... I'm not sure anyone here knows. But I'm not sure it can be immediately labeled a marketing flop.
I think there is a huge "it depends" there. What was Acura's goal? Was it to sell a ton of them? Surely not, they knew it wouldn't sell like hotcakes at that price point. But if they were positioning it as a brand statement in terms of what they could do, they did that pretty well. Whether or not it is worth it... I'm not sure anyone here knows. But I'm not sure it can be immediately labeled a marketing flop.
It's actually a pretty freakin cool car IMHO.
Pretty sure their goal was to sell more than 20 cars a month in the US.
If lap times don't matter why is Porsche taking their GT2 RS all over the country, setting production car lap records, and bragging about it all over social media?
Will the success of the marketing be based solely on a lap time? No way... but is it a nice feather in the cap? Yes, very much so.
The GT2 set the Nurburgring production car lap record. Road courses are its raison d'être. That, I think, is a different situation.
Marketing a specific performance figure is risky because there's always somebody faster. All they have to do is quote a better number to turn your own argument against you.
If Chevy were to organize their product launch marketing around a lap time, it ought to be something truly historic, not merely a very fast time. The first Corvette in the sixes, perhaps.
The GT2 set the Nurburgring production car lap record. Road courses are its raison d'être. That, I think, is a different situation.
Marketing a specific performance figure is risky because there's always somebody faster. All they have to do is quote a better number to turn your own argument against you.
If Chevy were to organize their product launch marketing around a lap time, it ought to be something truly historic, not merely a very fast time. The first Corvette in the sixes, perhaps.
I think lap times definitely matter on all types of racing. The Vette has been great on a number of different types of tracks including drag. Easy mods and you’re pumping out serious power. I do track all my cars so maybe thats why but I like to know the limits of the car I’m driving in various venues. So, yes track times matters and I think when you’re comparing performance cars don’t you want to know what it’s capable of and how it stacks up. Isn’t that like in the car guy code
Huh? The car is a complete flop from a sales/marketing perspective. You can learn a ton from Acura's long drawn out gestation of the car, changing the core power-train of the car and starting over right as it was about to be ready etc. etc.
And yet for being a flop, it is still in production, still being marketed, still being sold. I really have no idea what to make of it. To me, it us kinda like a 4C, something that exists but is such an anomoly that I really can't spend any time trying to figure out in regards of a larger market perspective. I don't think any correlation exists.
I think lap times definitely matter on all types of racing. The Vette has been great on a number of different types of tracks including drag. Easy mods and you’re pumping out serious power. I do track all my cars so maybe thats why but I like to know the limits of the car I’m driving in various venues. So, yes track times matters and I think when you’re comparing performance cars don’t you want to know what it’s capable of and how it stacks up. Isn’t that like in the car guy code
I'm all for detailed performance specs, and a time in the low 7 minutes is very fast. I just wouldn't focus my all-new sports car launch on the fact that it's the 11th-fastest (or whatever) production car around the Nurburgring.
Pretty sure their goal was to sell more than 20 cars a month in the US.
Their original goal was approximately 2,000 annually, and them they adjusted that number downward to 1,000, with 900 of them for the American market and 100 of them for the Japanese market. The NSX was designed all along for the American market. and Honda/Acura believed there was a market for 2,000 annually at their $160,000+ price tag.
Boy, were they wrong.
And GM could be just as wrong with the mid engine Corvette. No doubt it will sell more than 20 a month, but 3,300 a month could be too much of a stretch.
I'm all for detailed performance specs, and a time in the low 7 minutes is very fast. I just wouldn't focus my all-new sports car launch on the fact that it's the 11th-fastest (or whatever) production car around the Nurburgring.
Faster than probably most can push a car but it’s still fun to talk about. Just DCT alone, if it’s worth its salt will shave off time for just about any driver. Plenty of topics on engine placement. This car should be faster than a c7 Z06. I agree with poster above make a statement with this car. The Z06 version needs to be close to the viper acr the ZR1 needs to beat the GT3 RS. If there’s the alleged high horsepower Zora or option then has be close to the 2rs. If you’re going to make a statement.
I was skeptical at first, but the video really seems to suggest it. I would be poor marketing to setup the video like that and then come out with a 7:2X time. My wager is the car ran the time and then the 7/18 date was chosen accordingly. They're playing from a new playbook now that the car was delayed from the original January reveal plan.
A logical post... the OP’s original post... not so much.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.