When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Not sure why everyone is trying to apply solutions for an automatic to a DCT. A DCT is not an automatic, it's a manual that will shift for you. There is no torque converter or a ton of other components in an automatic. I have already told my wife there will be a learning curve on the feel and how a DCT works, it will not have the same feel as an automatic because it isn't one.
So true. My daughter has a '17 Ford Focus with a DCT and she has constantly complained about how it shifts, drives and sounds. When I explained to her that she should not expect it to behave like the automatic transmissions that she is used to, everything became OK.
Last edited by Bob Paris; Aug 11, 2019 at 01:44 PM.
DCTs and automatics are simply not the same beasts. DCTs can in some ways be programmed to mimic an auto but that doesn’t mean that a DCT is for all intents and purposes an auto. The C8 DCT appears to conceptually be a double shafted manual transmission with two clutches that are interchangeably activated optimally by a robotic computer. In that respect, it can accomplish things that neither an automatic or a true manual clutched tranny can.
If, as some have related, the C8 DCT can automatically disconnect the clutches when the brake is applied while sitting at a stop light, then wear issues associated with creep mode would be significantly minimized and the occasional jerky DCT issues coming off a stop would also be minimized or eliminated when a clutch engages into creep mode as the brake pedal is released.
Also, keep in mind that it appears the C8 programming can be modified over WiFi perhaps similarly to what Tesla does. If this is indeed the case, and it applies to DCT programming updates, this really is a whole new ballgame.
Early Gallardo with E-gear trans was supposed to last for +80k miles. Actual life of the clutches was 4000-30,000, with many below 15k miles. Maybe GM has it sorted out right, maybe they will last 80k miles or more, maybe the slipping between modes will not affect the life of the clutches. As there is no alternative, I can understand why there will be an offering to defeat the V4 mode, due to the extra clutch wear, and the fact that some folks just don't like driving a V4 Corvette.
Early Gallardo with E-gear trans was supposed to last for +80k miles. Actual life of the clutches was 4000-30,000, with many below 15k miles. Maybe GM has it sorted out right, maybe they will last 80k miles or more, maybe the slipping between modes will not affect the life of the clutches. As there is no alternative, I can understand why there will be an offering to defeat the V4 mode, due to the extra clutch wear, and the fact that some folks just don't like driving a V4 Corvette.
Comparing single dry clutch f1 stye style transmissions to modern dual clutch transmissions with respect to clutch life is apples to oranges
The real question is will it be able to be installed in the c8 and NOT have them notice the cars never been in v4 mode and VOID there goes your warranty..
Not sure why everyone is trying to apply solutions for an automatic to a DCT. A DCT is not an automatic, it's a manual that will shift for you. There is no torque converter or a ton of other components in an automatic. I have already told my wife there will be a learning curve on the feel and how a DCT works, it will not have the same feel as an automatic because it isn't one.
So what you're saying is there is no torque converter to slip while in V4 mode, that may eventually lead to the shudder problem. Instead the clutches in the DCT will slip.
Whew!! That's a relief........Oh,..... wait a minute.
Wow, people act like this is the first DCT ever invented.....I would hope that GM has learned from other manufacturers and improved any shortfallings. I wouldn't go out and buy a device before knowing if I need it or not. In 6-7 months when you get the car, drive it and then decide if you want it to behave differently than GM built it.
Comparing single dry clutch f1 stye style transmissions to modern dual clutch transmissions with respect to clutch life is apples to oranges
Mike
It was framed as an early life failure comparison(C8 is Corvette first automated clutch operation), not a technology comparison. I'm sorry you weren't able to gather that, and went a different direction.
It was framed as an early life failure comparison(C8 is Corvette first automated clutch operation), not a technology comparison. I'm sorry you weren't able to gather that, and went a different direction.
Just clarifying it has nothing to do with early life or late life. F1 style single dry clutches wear much faster. Doesnt matter if its first year production or last. Dual clutch transmissions shouldnt but we'll just have to see if they have teething issues.
Just clarifying it has nothing to do with early life or late life. F1 style single dry clutches wear much faster. Doesnt matter if its first year production or last. Dual clutch transmissions shouldnt but we'll just have to see if they have teething issues.
Mike
It may not to you, it might to others, like me. BTW, the very first sentence of my post which you quoted was the estimate from Lamborghini of the clutch life expectancy circa 2004. Sadly again, you continue to frame the discussion about the technology of the two, and not the reason why some here are concerned about the DCT, and how it will perform with the V8-V4 transition. The very first thread mentions slip, and several after that.
It may not to you, it might to others, like me. BTW, the very first sentence of my post which you quoted was the estimate from Lamborghini of the clutch life expectancy circa 2004. Sadly again, you continue to frame the discussion about the technology of the two, and not the reason why some here are concerned about the DCT, and how it will perform with the V8-V4 transition. The very first thread mentions slip, and several after that.