When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
You can start by not making **** up. By posting this you are claiming it's a valve spring failure that caused it. That car was delivered to the owner in early March. It wasn't a June - September build.
Drove mine again today, 1,600+ miles 3313 VIN early June build.
Pretty surprised by the tires, I have Z51 PS4 on the car and it was low 50s today, the gauge did finally go from cool to normal, but I didn't perceive any decrease in grip and did a couple 0-60 runs that felt like when it was really hot out.
Early failure. One guy had his fail while he was actually taking delivery of the car.
It's really ridiculous. These cars are ticking time bombs. GM needs to do a ******* formal recall.
Hmm, you started this Thread BUT do you have a C8 or just one the Porsche lovers who have fun knocking the C8?
I don't use fowl language on the Forum as you appear to like- all I can say is, "F*** Porsche!" Don't give a crape what they do!
Now for those with C8s, mine was built early September, VIN xx 8002. Have no idea when the engine was built in Tonawanda NY where the valve springs were installed.
My C8 has 700+ miles and has hit 6500 rpm a number of times and works fine. My "guess" from the one pic we have of a broken spring and failures occurring with low miles this is "probably" and internal defect NOT a bad batch of springs improperly heat treated. Tonawanda probably checks batches of springs for spring force at installed height and max lift. Easy to do and probably a tight spec. BUT a statistical sample will not pick up a few springs with internal defects. In fact a defective spring could even pass that test. Best place to check spring wire for defects is when it's rod as it enters the wire drawing machine.
IMO GM would be foolish to have a recall replacing a large number of good springs!
I asked in another forum and never got an answer.
Is there a particular cylinder that the spring breaks in, or is a random cylinder?
Is it only one spring that goes bad or is it multiple springs.
Most post are only one spring that broke, If tested out OK, could another spring break?
I can't understand if it is a bad batch, why are only one spring in an engine breaking?
I asked in another forum and never got an answer.
Is there a particular cylinder that the spring breaks in, or is a random cylinder?
Is it only one spring that goes bad or is it multiple springs.
Most post are only one spring that broke, If tested out OK, could another spring break?
I can't understand if it is a bad batch, why are only one spring in an engine breaking?
IMO, it's one and for this reason, look at the one pic we have of a broken spring:
It's a clean break not from a weak spring, which might be expected form say bad heat treating. My "GUESS" is its a metallurgical defect, like a nonmetallic inclusion etc. That would occur in some from a batch of bad rod the wire was made from. That batch of spings would be sent to the Tonawanda engine plant where they would be placed on the engine. Best GM can do is define about which egines might have used springs made from that bad batch of wire. Probably a small percentage and would cause short term failures.
Time will tell. But if over 500 miles looks like you may be safe.
I asked in another forum and never got an answer.
Is there a particular cylinder that the spring breaks in, or is a random cylinder?
Is it only one spring that goes bad or is it multiple springs.
Most post are only one spring that broke, If tested out OK, could another spring break?
I can't understand if it is a bad batch, why are only one spring in an engine breaking?
If memory serves (no guarantees ) I think I have seen #5 and #8 but don't know what other cylinders have had one. Seems to be random, and not head related, but truly spring failing from what Jerry has described.
6183. 7/27 Build. 440 Miles. Not yet...but I am smack dab in the middle of the range of cars that were ID'd as possible problem cars, so it enters my mind every time I take it out.
If memory serves (no guarantees ) I think I have seen #5 and #8 but don't know what other cylinders have had one. Seems to be random, and not head related, but truly spring failing from what Jerry has described.
Thank Jerry and Phil for the reply...
I still don't understand why only ONE spring is breaking.
If it is a bad supply batch, shouldn't more break per engine.
Or is there a special valve spring per cylinder because of the cylinder de activation? that is breaking?
Thank Jerry and Phil for the reply...
I still don't understand why only ONE spring is breaking.
If it is a bad supply batch, shouldn't more break per engine.
Or is there a special valve spring per cylinder because of the cylinder de activation? that is breaking?
Not a special spring, they are all the same. GM probably gets them by the thousands, the same spring goes in truck 6.2 liter motors and 5.3. If a few bad ones are in a container holding thousands of them it's just spring lottery at that point.
Thank Jerry and Phil for the reply...
I still don't understand why only ONE spring is breaking.
If it is a bad supply batch, shouldn't more break per engine.
Or is there a special valve spring per cylinder because of the cylinder de activation? that is breaking?
Say a 1000 springs were made from a particular draw of wire and that wire had one defect in it. Then the spring made from the section of wire with the defect in it will break.
It may not necessarily be an out of spec defect that is causing the problems. Nothing is perfect and the wire is likely allowed a certain number of (very small) defects within a certain proximity of each other. Normally these defects wouldn't cause a problem. The problem is when a defect is large enough to case a stress concentration that generates a crack. And sometimes cracks are "self healing" when they get to an area of lower stresses and they no longer propagate. Usually the center of the wire in a spring is under less stress than the exterior surface.
Ductility normally has an influence on crack propagation. If the heat treatment was performed such that the springs are too "brittle" then defects that wouldn't normally be a problem could cause crack initiation and propagation.
I'm not a spring expert but it would be interesting to hear from one.