5th Gear
It's looking more like an act of desperation, than first choice.
No, you really don't have any skin the supercar game... You own a Corvette. Great car, incredible value, but nope, it's not a supercar.
And BMW really hasn't built a car I want to buy in about 20 years. Gesture control is almost universally panned, And I thought spinners, (the floating center caps might as well be spinners), were played out in the 90's... I don't care how much Hp you throw at a 5 series it's still a whale, and it's not fun to drive. Yes, it's fun to mash the gas, but it's not fun to drive. My 310rwhp E36 M3 6 speed, (that I've owned since new) weighs 3200# and is still a blast to actually drive. Yes, my C7 Z51, and my soon to be built C8 Z51 will be faster, but I doubt they will be as engaging to drive.
I'm probably glad I've never test drove a Lotus Evora....I bet that's an absolute hoot when it's running..
Saying that one’s car is as fast or perhaps even faster in a straight line or on a given track than a super car does not necessarily make that car a supercar. But if one's ego requires that his or her car be considered a supercar, then what’s the harm in letting them believe what they will and even enthusiastically agreeing with them?
Last edited by B747VET; Dec 24, 2020 at 01:28 AM.
Saying that one’s car is as fast or perhaps even faster in a straight line or on a given track than a super car does not necessarily make that car a supercar. But if one's ego requires that his or her car be considered a supercar, then what’s the harm in letting them believe what they will and even enthusiastically agreeing with them?
You quoted someone, can you tell us who, so we can know who’s definition it is?
So a Ferrari 488 Pista is not a supercar? How about a Porsche 959? Lamborghini Muira SV?
In the spirit of the Christmas season, please allow to me to be among the first to propose formal recognition that your C8 is now and forevermore indeed a true Supercar worthy of being garaged in automotive collections and museums with all the other amazing Supercars of the past and present. Congratulations, and I look forward to observing your joy at the ever increasing auction valuation your C8 shall enjoy in the coming years as so frequently do the owners of other true Supercars.
Last edited by B747VET; Dec 24, 2020 at 02:04 PM.
In the spirit of the Christmas season, please allow to me to be among the first to propose formal recognition that your C8 is now and forevermore indeed a true Supercar worthy of being garaged in automotive collections and museums with all the other amazing Supercars of the past and present. Congratulations, and I look forward to observing your joy at the ever increasing auction valuation your C8 shall enjoy in the coming years as so frequently do the owners of other true Supercars.

In the spirit of the Christmas season, please allow to me to be among the first to propose formal recognition that your C8 is now and forevermore indeed a true Supercar worthy of being garaged in automotive collections and museums with all the other amazing Supercars of the past and present. Congratulations, and I look forward to observing your joy at the ever increasing auction valuation your C8 shall enjoy in the coming years as so frequently do the owners of other true Supercars.
It seems you are greatly unhappy that several models of Corvette have met your definition over time, and great cars of the past are no longer supercars. I have denigrated nothing. I have not said the Corvette is a supercar, nor asked for it to be called one. You seem to be determined that it is not one, but it meets the definition you gave. So you need to go back to the drawing board to twist whoever's definition you quoted, so the Corvette isn't and never has been a supercar (even though it held the endurance speed record for production cars for a while), and so other great cars will be or have been supercars.
I note that you did not provide an attribute for your quote. Why is that?
Last edited by Racer X; Dec 24, 2020 at 02:42 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
If you can't define something, then you are in no position to say a particular car is or is not a supercar.
......
A supercar should be defined by performance characteristics alone. Anything else is just snobbery, and I see that is an important part for some people, quite sad really.
You say that only “performance characteristics” can be used to define what is and isn’t a “supercar.” So, again, you have the audacity to tell everyone else in the automotive world that only you, and you alone, are allowed to define the term “supercar.” On reflection, and putting aside the audacity aspect, I think the problem is that you are confusing the term super with other terms such as fastest or quickest or even high performance. Perhaps the problem is not that you can’t define “supercar”. The problem is that the meaning and normal societal application of the descriptor “super” seems to allude you, at least with respect to the automotive world in general and the Corvette world in particular.
In one of my dictionaries, the term super is defined or illustrated as an article or product of superior size, quality or grade. As an adjective, examples of the term “super” impart images of very large, or great, or extreme, or excellence.
The terms super yacht or super skyscraper are commonly used to connote superior size, or excellence in design and or construction, or materials utilized, or quality of assembly. A super yacht is not necessarily the largest yacht nor the fastest yacht and often is not even a “fast yacht.” The term usually connotes a superior standard of excellence of design, materials, and actual construction that is far above the norm and quite often, in fact almost always, entails a cost of acquisition and operation is a major resulting determinant. However, the fastest yachts are not necessarily super yachts by any normal industry reference standard.
All of this has nothing to do with what you term as snobbery, it is simply how the world generally considers and determines when an object rises to a level of superiority or excellence that might rightly be described as “super.” Along those same lines, your position is more akin to reverse snobbery. In your book, it seems that individuals who consider factors related to ultimate quality of a car or the resulting market value of a car are in actuality “super snobs” because they consider the myriad other factors beyond actual performance in determining how and when to properly label a car as a supercar.
You say that you don’t necessarily consider the Corvette C8 a supercar and you don’t care whether or not the C8 is labeled as a supercar, yet you constantly question and even sometimes belittle anyone who dares to propose that the C8 isn’t a supercar. There isn’t a lot of logic and connection between your declared and somewhat conflicting positions.
If you feel the C8 is a super car, good on you. A good number of folks might very well agree with you. Good for them too. But, when you begin telling others who disagree that they must provide the basis for their conclusions and justify their conclusions to your satisfaction, you are crossing a line.
Last edited by B747VET; Dec 26, 2020 at 07:11 PM.
and really, most cars are sold to very bad drivers...
























