When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I realize the new LT2 engine was introduced in the new 2020 C8. Is this engine being used in any other GM models? The reason I ask I just watched Jay Leno’s garage review and test drive of the 2023 Z06, he mentioned to the GM engineer that this Z06 was special because the all New LT6 will only be used in the C8 Z06 exclusively like no other Corvette and the engineer did not correct him. The engineer did mention Originally the C6 Z06 came out with the LS7 exclusively until they used it in the CAMARO Z28 and the 427 Corvette in 2013.
I would appreciate your thoughts and knowledge on this subject.
RYTOCOR
SAVE THE WAVE 👋
The LT2 was designed to be mounted low in the vehicle which could be accomplished because of the design of the transaxle with the input shaft on the bottom. I suspect other vehicles will have another LT variant for their applications unless they develop a bottom input shaft transmission for those vehicles.
I'm not saying it can't be done, it just would be sort of a waste to put a LT2 in a vehicle that didn't take advantage of the low mounting.
The LT2 was designed to be mounted low in the vehicle which could be accomplished because of the design of the transaxle with the input shaft on the bottom. I suspect other vehicles will have another LT variant for their applications unless they develop a bottom input shaft transmission for those vehicles.
I'm not saying it can't be done, it just would be sort of a waste to put a LT2 in a vehicle that didn't take advantage of the low mounting.
It sits low because it’s an OHV. Low CG is a good thing regardless of what vehicle it’s on.
It sits low because it’s an OHV. Low CG is a good thing regardless of what vehicle it’s on.
My point is the low input shaft of the DCT transaxle with the input shaft mounted below the output shaft allows the LT2 engine to be mounted lower. The shallow oil pan and filter noted above would only provide more ground clearance if mated with a conventional transmission that has the input shaft positioned above the output shaft.
The shallow oil pan allows for adequate ground clearance when the LT2 is mated with the DCT transaxle.
The LT2 has specific design elements to allow it sit lower than previous LT engines could:
My LS1 had a flat oil pan that wasn’t in the Firebird/Camaro. It’s not really a new trick to LT2’s and it’s still a modular design that can be applied to any RWD vehicle in GM’s lineup.
I believe every Corvette back to 1953 has been an OHV engine.
Not quite. The LT5 on the 1990-1995 ZR1’s were DOHC.
It was a purpose built engine just for the Corvette, designed by Lotus and built by Mercury Marine. Coincidently it also doubled the price of the Corvette. Purpose built drivetrains are not cheap.
GM said the biggest advantage to the LT2, in terms of extra power, was the ability to have the top exit, free flowing exhaust, a taller intake manifold since the driver didn't have to see over it, and a freer flowing cold air intake that didn't have to route over or around the hot radiator. To put the engine in the front of another car, you'd have to make the intake lower / smaller, route the exhaust around the transmission, and have a more complex cold air intake (like the C7's with 2 right-angle bends). GM also said the camshaft timing on the LT2 was revised to take advantage of the better air flow, so they'd have to change that, too.
By the time they were done, they'd essentially be back to the LT1.
I believe every Corvette back to 1953 has been an OHV engine.
Originally Posted by Majestic94
Not quite. The LT5 on the 1990-1995 ZR1’s were DOHC.
It was a purpose built engine just for the Corvette, designed by Lotus and built by Mercury Marine. Coincidently it also doubled the price of the Corvette. Purpose built drivetrains are not cheap.
The LT2 was designed to be mounted low in the vehicle which could be accomplished because of the design of the transaxle with the input shaft on the bottom. I suspect other vehicles will have another LT variant for their applications unless they develop a bottom input shaft transmission for those vehicles.
I'm not saying it can't be done, it just would be sort of a waste to put a LT2 in a vehicle that didn't take advantage of the low mounting.
Yep, in addition to being low the intake is part of the key to it's power. It is very high and would stick out of a FE car!
PS: See I responded with LT6 not LT2. However similar high intake straight air shot intake into combustion chamber as a key to more power! He's pic. Would still stick out of a FE engine hood!
GM said the biggest advantage to the LT2, in terms of extra power, was the ability to have the top exit, free flowing exhaust, a taller intake manifold since the driver didn't have to see over it, and a freer flowing cold air intake that didn't have to route over or around the hot radiator. To put the engine in the front of another car, you'd have to make the intake lower / smaller, route the exhaust around the transmission, and have a more complex cold air intake (like the C7's with 2 right-angle bends). GM also said the camshaft timing on the LT2 was revised to take advantage of the better air flow, so they'd have to change that, too.
By the time they were done, they'd essentially be back to the LT1.
The LT2 is essentially an LT1.5. What makes it an LT2 is mostly bolt on stuff that changes from car to car anyway.
In 21st Century parlance, it’s assumed that a flat head engine is not an option, thus its OHV vs OHC.
Funny at car shows there are still a few folks with Flathead Fords in Roadsters! Cost a lot more to build a flathead than to buy a modern crate engine that most use!
My first car was a 1941 Ford Business coupe; some called Opera Coupes as it had fold-down jumper seats in the rear leaving a lot of room for samples etc! It came with an economical small flathead called the V8 60 for 60 hp. It only had 136 cid. When I bought it over a year before I had my driver's license it had a 255 cid Merc flathead rated at 125 hp. I added the popular three Stromberg '97 cars and what was called "ported and releaved" the block. Doubt I got a lot more power. In any case was no match for the OHV engines in 1959 so built and early Olds engine all from parts I bought in peach baskets and had it bored 1/8 inches for '55 Olds pistons! A lot more power! Yep flatheads came in all sizes.
In fact Zora Arkus-Duntov when he first came to the US manufactured aftermarket OHV hemi heads they sold for the flathead! They were called "Ardun' heads for ARkos DUNtov!