When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am sure it does work but how? The way I see it if you are cruising at 75 MPH in V8 mode which requires "X" GPH of fuel to produce "Y" HP. When the engine switches into V4 mode you still need "X" GPH of fuel to produce "Y" HP to maintain going 75 MPH. So where does the fuel savings come from? The only thing I can think of that is different is half the engine valves aren't opening. Is the power required to open these 8 valves enough to give the increase in fuel mileage? Or is there something else that increases the mileage that I am not considering?
I am sure it does work but how? The way I see it if you are cruising at 75 MPH in V8 mode which requires "X" GPH of fuel to produce "Y" HP. When the engine switches into V4 mode you still need "X" GPH of fuel to produce "Y" HP to maintain going 75 MPH. So where does the fuel savings come from? The only thing I can think of that is different is half the engine valves aren't opening. Is the power required to open these 8 valves enough to give the increase in fuel mileage? Or is there something else that increases the mileage that I am not considering?
You arent producing "Y" HP to maintain going 75mph. By cutting off 4 cylinders, the car is producing less HP. The idea is you dont need "Y" HP to maintain 75mph, so as long as you arent on an incline or accelerating, the extra HP from the 2nd four cylinders isnt needed, thus less fuel use.
Personally I dont give a rats patoot about the fuel economy so I keep it in V8 mode all the time. Even if I set my cruise control at 75mph, I prefer to have all 8 cylinders firing, all the time.
Yep, it's pretty simple. If running exclusively as a V8, much of the time, it is producing more power and burning more fuel than necessary to maintain the desired speed.
I am sure it does work but how? The way I see it if you are cruising at 75 MPH in V8 mode which requires "X" GPH of fuel to produce "Y" HP. When the engine switches into V4 mode you still need "X" GPH of fuel to produce "Y" HP to maintain going 75 MPH. So where does the fuel savings come from? The only thing I can think of that is different is half the engine valves aren't opening. Is the power required to open these 8 valves enough to give the increase in fuel mileage? Or is there something else that increases the mileage that I am not considering?
I understand your thinking. Horsepower is force times speed. Running down the road at 75mph requires the same force regardless of the amount of power the engine is capable of producing. I believe the savings comes in by it being more efficieint to produce the energy in 4 cyclinders than 8, but I am not an "engine" person and only speculating on that.
I understand your thinking. Horsepower is force time speed. Runnign down the road at 75mph requies the same force regadless of the amount of power the engine is capable of producing. I believe the savings comes in by it being more effcieint to produce the energy in 4 cyclinders than 8, but I am not an "engine" person and only speculating on that.
Yes going 75 will take the same HP with 4 or 8 cylinders so efficiency must be greater running on 4 cylinders. This must be because of lower friction because 8 valves are not being opened and there is less friction between the rings and cylinder walls due to no combustion pressure.
I think I read somewhere that with the valves closed the air in the deactivated cylinders essentially act as springs and help to efficiently turn the crank in low load situations. But alas, a mechanical engineer I am not.
One thing no one has brought up is how little HP is required to keep a car moving at a steady speed on the highway. IIRC it only takes about 20HP to maintain a constant speed between 60 - 70 mph.
I found a youtube video that tested a 2020 C8 mostly on the freeway at 73 mph in cruse control. He filled up using the 3 click method at a gas station near an on ramp. He got on the freeway and drove 30 miles, turned around and drove back then filled up again. He did this once in "turning auto" and once in "turning manual". When driving in manual he shifted at 2000 rpm. He compared the car's speed and millage with a stand alone gps. He calculated the millage and compared it to the cars reported numbers. The results of a 60 mile trip was with AFM he got 28 mpg and with out AFM he got 27. These numbers were rounded to the nearest whole number which is 1.67%. You can decide whether this is good or not but it is interesting.
I'm going with GM testing over a single datapoint, YouTube video produced by someone who failed to report variables he/she did not control and might have had an "agenda." Obviously, a company is not going to go to great expense and added complexity to implement a fuel saving feature that produces less fuel economy.
I doubt you have any evidence that AFM caused your lifter problem. You probably just decided it did.
yes I do cam was scored tech is friend saw everything first hand engine out exhaust out so much was out of car it looked like a shell rolling down assy line trans out also.
Oh by the way Marine auto tech finished in top 5 all classes. Worked at city Chevrolet Charlotte NC not my first rodeo. Retire GM Service parts Division 78 years old be 79 in October.