When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Throttle position doesn't control fuel delivery, it controls air delivery. In an old carbureted design, it might have had a more direct effect on fuel delivery as the air passes over the venturi and air pressure controls the fuel delivery, along with direct linkages to fuel pumps, etc.
In a fuel injected car, fuel delivery is controlled by a computer that uses a MAF (manifold air flow) sensor to gauge how much air is being delivered to determine how much fuel to deliver (along with a myriad of other factors). That throttle body could be controlled by a direct cable, but typically it is not because of many factors including emissions controls. Some vehicles do it that way though, and they have a throttle position sensor at the throttle body. This is a throttle position sensor vs a pedal position sensor. In a drive by wire, the two are not the same.
The c8 is drive by wire. The soler pedal commander doesn't install at the throttle body, it installs at the pedal. It just tricks the vehicle into believing the pedal is in a different position than it truly is.
I don't see the utility of them unless perhaps you have limited range of motion with your right leg, or you like the feeling that your car is out of control.
Understand. But in a throttle by wire (our C8s) the car controls the throttle opening not just your foot (the lag). The mass air meter then dictates how much fuel to add to keep the air fuel ratio correct. Does the ECU/TCU control the opening ramp (0-100%) based on the algorithm in the controller and not just with pedal position? I believe this to be the case (primarily to deal with EPA requirements). With a throttle by cable, the throttle opening is directly tied to the pedal and the mass air flow will naturally follow. The ECU will then control fuel to keep the air fuel ratio at the appropriate levels based on what the O2 sensors are telling the ECU (and whatever maps are in the ECU). The ramp would only be tied to what the mass air meter was telling the ECU (more pounds of air, more fuel). BTW, I do have the Soler controller installed on my C8 and like the "new" throttle response.
Does the ECU/TCU control the opening ramp (0-100%) based on the algorithm in the controller and not just with pedal position?.
Throttle body opening is based on throttle pedal input and the throttle mapping which is user adjustable in settings and can be further attenuated via throttle controllerd. It can also be overridden by everything from stability control/ ptm/tc to toque request versus observed.
- Is this dip and flattening after >80% / 0:125 sec an issue with just this one controller? Has another controller been sent to verify?
- Is this a compatibility issue with just the Z06 or a common artifact seen when installed on Stingrays as well?
- It would be useful to see the same data plots collected on a Stingray with the Soler controller installed to verify if this same artifact happens on a Stingray as well...Currently I'm not "feeling" the same flattening and dip occur on my C8 Z51 with the controller installed and set to Sport 5
A few other comments I have:
- I don't think anyone believes this throttle controller adds hp or increases performance in anyway...That's just ignorant to assume otherwise.
- Quickly mashing the pedal to the floor is not the same as increasing throttle sensitivity..
- Most people that already have this controller installed are probably finding, as I have, that this controller has some very useful features as well as providing a highly customizable throttle response that enhances the overall driving experience...
You can accomplish the same by mashing your foot down faster. All this is doing is adding a bit of expo in.
"Psychologically" you think you are getting more power, because you aren't pushing the pedal nearly as much. However, WOT is still WOT....
I'd rather spend my money on WHEEL SPINNERS.
Everyone acknowledges it doesn't add any actual power at WOT. But how much time do you spend at WOT on the street? 1%, maybe 2%. Throttle controllers make a difference at smaller openings where you spend almost all your time on the street. I, too, believed that you can get the same effect by just pushing the gas pedal down faster. Technically maybe true, but a throttle controller like this really does change how the car feels. A friend who's opinion I value convinced me to try it, and it really does make the car *feel* more sporty and more responsive. It make drivin it more pleasurable. And isn't that the point of driving a sports car?
Originally Posted by dohabandit
Totally disagree with this statement, "within reason".
I can go from 0 to full pedal quite rapidly. Yes, you could create an expo map where 10% physical pedal input equates to a commanded WOT and get a faster reaction time, but good luck with your insurance company...and I hope the repairs aren't too costly.
With a reasonable amount of expo, a human can mash the pedal to full WOT just as fast as the pedal quickly gets past the region where the expo was present and into the linear portion of the transfer function.
Again, how often do you drive at WOT? On the street hardly ever, I'll wager. Your argument is a red herring.
Don't you find it telling that virtually everyone who actually tries one loves it, and those who criticize it have never actually tried one?
Last edited by Red Mist Rulz; Jun 3, 2023 at 05:57 PM.
Not quite…. Remember this was done with the engine not running. There is a breakpoint between closed/no throttle and part throttle. With the engine not running, the throttles are held open a small amount. Once the engine fires and exceeds a minimum engine speed, the ECM transitions from crank mode to running mode and the throttle position is then controlled to give a desired RPM. The drop in the throttle position you see on the graphs is not lag, rather it is the point of transition from idle to part throttle. The graph would look different with the engine running.
I was thinking about this, and wondering if a static test had any actual validity in terms of real world use. I tested mine extensively at different settings, different throttle openings, different speeds of pedal application, and never felt any dip in response. I think the graphs are very misleading.
Everyone acknowledges it doesn't add any actual power at WOT. But how much time do you spend at WOT on the street? 1%, maybe 2%. Throttle controllers make a difference at smaller openings where you spend almost all your time on the street. I, too, believed that you can get the same effect by just pushing the gas pedal down faster. Technically maybe true, but a throttle controller like this really does change how the car feels. A friend who's opinion I value convinced me to try it, and it really does make the car *feel* more sporty and more responsive. It make drivin it more pleasurable. And isn't that the point of driving a sports car?
Again, how often do you drive at WOT? On the street hardly ever, I'll wager. Your argument is a red herring.
Don't you find it telling that virtually everyone who actually tries one loves it, and those who criticize it have never actually tried one?
You aren't understanding the point. The point is this device is just changing the sensitivity of the pedal. You push it less, you get more, up to a point where it returns to linearity or depending I guess on the program you selected.
You can get the EXACT SAME response with your engine, just pushing your foot down faster and further. Yep, it will make it seem a lot peppier because you are giving it the beans.
It is similar to adjusting brake pedal sensitivity. No one is claiming it gives more power. But, the throttle pedal is more responsive. Less pedal travel is needed for a given response - and that makes some people happy.
You aren't understanding the point. The point is this device is just changing the sensitivity of the pedal. You push it less, you get more, up to a point where it returns to linearity or depending I guess on the program you selected.
You can get the EXACT SAME response with your engine, just pushing your foot down faster and further. Yep, it will make it seem a lot peppier because you are giving it the beans.
And you're missing the bigger point, which it that it WORKS to enhance the driving experience. I know exactly how it works and what it does. I've driven with and without it, and just "pushing the pedal down more" doesn't replicate the same feel. NPP exhaust doesn't make the car any faster, but it makes the car sound like a sports car should sound (or at least closer to that), and that makes the driving experience more enjoyable for most of us.
It's got a money back guarantee, so instead of bloviating from a position of ignorance why don't you try it, and see if you still feel the same way. I felt the way you do until I used it. Then I changed my mind. You just might do the same.
They say ignorance is bliss, but actually learning something is even better.
Hi Folks. The ECM limits the throttle to 60% while under 3200 rpm, after that it will go to 100%. Nothing to do with the controller. What you see here is the controller superimposed with the ECM for whatever reason it wanted to intervene, the controller performance is the plot on our website.
Hi Folks. The ECM limits the throttle to 60% while under 3200 rpm, after that it will go to 100%. Nothing to do with the controller. What you see here is the controller superimposed with the ECM for whatever reason it wanted to intervene, the controller performance is the plot on our website.