When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It’d be nice to be able to disable AFM in every mode rather than just Track and Z-Mode Track. I notice mine switch over most of the time. It can be seamless at times but I wouldn’t say that is the norm in my experience.
Would agree that seamless to one person isn’t to another.
I have a 2023 Z51 with 1500 miles and I definitely hear it and feel it. Going to ping the dealership as its consistently switching and driving me CRAZY. I also don't what to have to drive around all the time in Manual mode or Z-mode. If it was truly seamless i wouldn't care
1) I can feel it
2) I can hear it. (non NPP exhaust)
3) I question what, if any benefit it has. The car get's good mileage on the highway because it has an 8 speed trans.
Just my opinion ...
My Silverado lost maybe a .5 mile to a mile per gallon tops, going from AFM to having it disabled.
I have a 2023 with Z51 package. I drove with my radio off and my windows down.
1. I can't hear the change over
2. I can't feel the change over
As I watch the dash as it switches back and forth, I don't notice any obvious changes (other than the indicator.)
It must be something with people's individual C8, (or imagination????)
Create a device that simply overrides that LED and you'll make a mint.
Yep, the V4 butterflies and mechanism are not a precision fit! Perhaps some dry Moly high temp lub can help?
"Create a device that simply overrides that LED and you'll make a mint."
Assume you you mean can't tell it's activated like mine now 3 years old! The old Click & Clack the Tappet Brothers solution would work. Just put a small piece of black electrical tape over the V4 indicator!
Would work for mine as have zero noise or sneezing sound etc. Been the same all 3 years!
I have a 2023 Z51 with 1500 miles and I definitely hear it and feel it. Going to ping the dealership as it’s consistently switching and driving me CRAZY. I also don't what to have to drive around all the time in Manual mode or Z-mode. If it was truly seamless i wouldn't care
Like others have said, I also have a 2023 Z51 Coupe and after 1500 miles, I have never heard it or felt it. I see the V4 light going on and off when driving normally, but that is the only indication that tells me it is switching. I rarely use Z-Mode and have only occasionally tried Track Mode, so I see the light on a regular basis.
Let your dealer take yours for a drive, as it seems to be specific to only certain cars.
Its fairly well known that the AFM or DFM that GM produces is/was a flawed design with the Lifter Failures. I've had a Silverado with the lifter failure and my buddy Mike aka Brink of Speed had the issue with his C7 Z06. Lets hope its improved in the C8. I wouldn't mind it going into V4 if I could trust it, but with the reputation of GM's lifter failures and my past experience and many others I just don't. The sad thing is running it in V8 mode, may not help!
Its fairly well known that the AFM or DFM that GM produces is/was a flawed design with the Lifter Failures. I've had a Silverado with the lifter failure and my buddy Mike aka Brink of Speed had the issue with his C7 Z06. Lets hope its improved in the C8. I wouldn't mind it going into V4 if I could trust it, but with the reputation of GM's lifter failures and my past experience and many others I just don't. The sad thing is running it in V8 mode, may not help!
The original DFM is a very different technology than the current AFM. Literally millions of small blocks with AFM on the road, and very few failures. And hydraulic lifters can fail in any car - even those without AFM.
You still have to produce the same amount of energy to go the distance, whether you burn it in 4, or 8.
That is true, and that brings me to my question: Are you always stressing the same 4 cylinders more than the idle 4? Or the ECU is smart enough to vary which cylinders are powering the vehicle, to rotate them? If always the same, just for that reason I wouldn't like it activated at all. I almost always drive my paddle vehicles in manual mode, so that'd be my preferred method of circumventing AFM. But don't like the unnecessary complication of having that crap on my car, but guess you have to look at it as it saved us some moolah in possible gas guzzler fees.
That is true, and that brings me to my question: Are you always stressing the same 4 cylinders more than the idle 4? Or the ECU is smart enough to vary which cylinders are powering the vehicle, to rotate them? If always the same, just for that reason I wouldn't like it activated at all. I almost always drive my paddle vehicles in manual mode, so that'd be my preferred method of circumventing AFM. But don't like the unnecessary complication of having that crap on my car, but guess you have to look at it as it saved us some moolah in possible gas guzzler fees.
[QUOTE=Revmanii;. You still have to produce the same amount of energy to go the distance, whether you burn it in 4, or 8.[/QUOTE]
As Tadge has explained, and has been posted here repeatedly, in 4 cyl mode the engine is operating with the throttle plate open more, which means less restriction, which means more efficiency.
Aside from that, your statement is obviously false. A Honda Civic uses far less energy to go the same distance at the same speed as a Corvette, even though the Corvette probably has less drag and probably cruises at lower rpm.
I've only driven in manual mode so it's never come on
I too only drive in manual for several reasons
1) I love paddle shifting it makes me feel more connected to the car
2) I tried driving in auto (D) after a 1000 miles but it kept going in and out of V4.
3) Still feel snake.bit from my C7 V4 mode experience.
Because you've seen and read testing that shows the improved gas mileage you get with AFM? I've yet to see anything that shows more than a mile per gallon benefit in the best circumstances. You still have to produce the same amount of energy to go the distance, whether you burn it in 4, or 8.
Originally Posted by Red Mist Rulz
As Tadge has explained, and has been posted here repeatedly, in 4 cyl mode the engine is operating with the throttle plate open more, which means less restriction, which means more efficiency.
Aside from that, your statement is obviously false. A Honda Civic uses far less energy to go the same distance at the same speed as a Corvette, even though the Corvette probably has less drag and probably cruises at lower rpm.
Your statement about what Tadge said is true - the throttle plate is open more, and it the engine is running more efficiently. But I think his statement is accurate as well. You still have to produce the same energy at the crankshaft and wheels with 4 cylinders (in V4 mode) that you had to produce with 8 cylinders in V8 mode, to maintain a constant speed. It takes very little hp to maintain a constant speed of 60 mph on a flat road - maybe 20 hp. With 8 cylinders, that about 2.5hp per cylinder - the throttle plate is really really closed down for that. Its very inefficient. With 4 cylinders, its 5 hp per cylinder - the throttle plate opens a little more (if you think it 40 hp the point is still the same). But the volumetric efficiency increased, and its correct that the improvement is related to reduced pumping loss. I posted a table of the estimated savings in post 27 from a technical paper. Its at best going to be about 5.5%. I think that consistent with something along the line of 1-2 mpg.
As engines incorporate other technology to increase volumetric efficiency - such as variable valve timing (which the C8 has), or turbocharging (that paper I mentioned in post 27 lists others), the improvement from Cylinder Deactivation gets a lots smaller - as you can also see in the table in post 27.
That is true, and that brings me to my question: Are you always stressing the same 4 cylinders more than the idle 4? Or the ECU is smart enough to vary which cylinders are powering the vehicle, to rotate them? If always the same, just for that reason I wouldn't like it activated at all. I almost always drive my paddle vehicles in manual mode, so that'd be my preferred method of circumventing AFM. But don't like the unnecessary complication of having that crap on my car, but guess you have to look at it as it saved us some moolah in possible gas guzzler fees.
The lifters are different in the 4 where the DI is shut off. BTW it closes the valves in such a way that combustion pressure is maintained in cylinders shut down! That retained pressure of the burnt air/fuel charge or exhaust gas charge in the combustion chamber contributes to a reduction in oil consumption, noise and vibration levels, and exhaust emissions when operating in V4 mode.
You don't appear to get the picture of what is happing! The folks pushing zero CO2 emissions are NOT going to Rich, Corvette, Ferrari etc owner's just pay money to pollute the earth with CO2. The 2012 EPA plan to have Corvettes require ~39 mpg by 2025 was a Prohibitive Fine of the manufacture if the EPA set goals by car family was not met! (That plan was stopped with a Pen BUT the new Pen reinstated one with 10% lower requirement in 2026 BUT no details. That will be announced January 2025! NOPE can't just pay money and destroy the world!
That is true, and that brings me to my question: Are you always stressing the same 4 cylinders more than the idle 4? Or the ECU is smart enough to vary which cylinders are powering the vehicle, to rotate them? If always the same, just for that reason I wouldn't like it activated at all. I almost always drive my paddle vehicles in manual mode, so that'd be my preferred method of circumventing AFM. But don't like the unnecessary complication of having that crap on my car, but guess you have to look at it as it saved us some moolah in possible gas guzzler fees.
Same 4 every time. But how much stress it is it? It only kicks in with steady cruising - at constant speed. Anything more than the mildest acceleration, or slightest incline causes it to revert to v8 mode. And it also returns to v8 mode with foot off the throttle. So its only steady cruising. I did a quick search and the hp required to maintain constant speed on flat ground (reasonable speed like 60 mph, not 195 mph) is about 20 hp. You may find other numbers, but its going to be on that order of magnitude. So, we are talking about producing that 20 hp with 4 cylinders instead of 8 cylinders. Yes, the 4 working cylinders will be firing and putting more force on the pistons, rods, and bearing than the 4 that are operating like springs. But maybe its not as much as one might imagine. Also, it has a duty cycle. I think every 10 minutes it will revert to V8 for 1 minute. I've seen different explanations for that and do not know which is correct. One is that the "captured" compression on the deactivated cylinders leaks down and this is to recharge it (but then why run in V8 for a full minute). The other is to help with even heating. Maybe its a bit of both.
That is true, and that brings me to my question: Are you always stressing the same 4 cylinders more than the idle 4? Or the ECU is smart enough to vary which cylinders are powering the vehicle, to rotate them? If always the same, just for that reason I wouldn't like it activated at all. I almost always drive my paddle vehicles in manual mode, so that'd be my preferred method of circumventing AFM. But don't like the unnecessary complication of having that crap on my car, but guess you have to look at it as it saved us some moolah in possible gas guzzler fees.
The conditions under which AFM is active means NO cylinders are being "stressed".
You don't appear to get the picture of what is happing! The folks pushing zero CO2 emissions are NOT going to Rich, Corvette, Ferrari etc owner's just pay money to pollute the earth with CO2. The 2012 EPA plan to have Corvettes require ~39 mpg by 2025 was a Prohibitive Fine of the manufacture if the EPA set goals by car family was not met! (That plan was stopped with a Pen BUT the new Pen reinstated one with 10% lower requirement in 2026 BUT no details. That will be announced January 2025! NOPE can't just pay money and destroy the world!
So if GM makes some EVs and puts Corvette badges on them and they sell enough EV Corvettes to average ~39 MPG between ICE and EV Corvettes, does that work? And if people aren't buying enough EV Corvettes they could increase the price of the ICE Corvettes to subsidize the EV Corvettes.