When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My C8 has only 260 miles on it. So, still in break-in period.
Does performance (throttle response, shift points, etc) change dramatically after the break in period?
I ask because I have a 2017 Jag F-Type R (supercharged - 550HP) to compare 'Vette to. The Jag feels a lot quicker both from a dead stop and in rolling throttle roll-ons. A whole lot quicker.
I'm a bit disappointed and surprised. All of the info I've seen on the Jag is that it does 0-60 in 3.9 secs. The 'Vette is s'posed to do that in 2.8 secs. And yet my C8 (2021 2LT Z51) feels a lot slower.
If I blip the throttle in the Jag, it immediately throws me back in the seat. If I blip the throttle in the C8, I hear it downshift once or twice but then have to wait a second for the acceleration to kick in.
2025 C8 Z06/7/E-Ray of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2021 C8 of the Year Finalist Unmodified
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (performance mods)
2019 C1 of Year Winner (performance mods)
2017 Corvette of the Year Finalist
2016 C2 of Year
2015 C3 of Year Finalist
Report back after 500 miles. You are missing a considerable amount of torque in 1st and second gear until it reaches 500 miles. When you get to 500, put it in track mode and jump on it. It should walk your Jag.
I thought the same, very underwhelming initially. Aside from the massive 30% torque reduction in 1st and 2nd, the car still feels lack luster in the rest of the gears. Speed Society published a dyno video on YouTube, it seems the car has reduced power output across the range until you hit 500 miles. See here:
It is almost like GM told us this would be the case, and some people did not listen, or did not believe them. And these same people are the reason GM put the computer controlled limitations on to reduce warranty claims from improperly broken in cars.
It is almost like GM told us this would be the case, and some people did not listen, or did not believe them. And these same people are the reason GM put the computer controlled limitations on to reduce warranty claims from improperly broken in cars.
Exactly, they would prefer 1500 miles but can you imagine all the complaining that would ensue? I'm taking it easy until 1500.