New ODBII Emissions Testing - What you need to know
#21
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Breslau Ontario
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The tests are getting ridiculous. My Son's 2000 Jetta Turbo failed his E-test this week. His check engine light was on, he re-set it before the test and it didn't come on for the two days prior. During the E-test it failed and the code showed "Low Voltage." He cleaned up the grounds under the battery tray, redid the test and it passed..
#22
Melting Slicks
A good friend of mine has P car---Boxster--engine light was on--would not pass---after tearing the whole thing down--it turned out to be a drop of water in the coil pack!!!! After 4 months of working on it!!!
#25
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Breslau Ontario
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#27
Le Mans Master
Hey Manny.......got the same info sent to me from from another source.....I printed it so when I see you in a couple of weeks I was going to bring it ( I still want a nice cam though Arun replied to me and wants to do his own custom grind..he agreed to meet us that Saturday as well. Let me know when you're back from vacation.
Agree, nothing but a cash grab.........amazing, which car emits more emissions into the air....the guy that drives his corrolla daily and puts on 30,000 kms a year or our toys that see 3000 kms a year?? Scam !! I hope this gets dropped like B.C. did !!!
Manny, you need to make friends with an e-test guy
Agree, nothing but a cash grab.........amazing, which car emits more emissions into the air....the guy that drives his corrolla daily and puts on 30,000 kms a year or our toys that see 3000 kms a year?? Scam !! I hope this gets dropped like B.C. did !!!
Manny, you need to make friends with an e-test guy
#28
Le Mans Master
#29
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Breslau Ontario
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#30
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Breslau Ontario
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Manny.......got the same info sent to me from from another source.....I printed it so when I see you in a couple of weeks I was going to bring it ( I still want a nice cam though Arun replied to me and wants to do his own custom grind..he agreed to meet us that Saturday as well. Let me know when you're back from vacation.
Agree, nothing but a cash grab.........amazing, which car emits more emissions into the air....the guy that drives his corrolla daily and puts on 30,000 kms a year or our toys that see 3000 kms a year?? Scam !! I hope this gets dropped like B.C. did !!!
Manny, you need to make friends with an e-test guy
Agree, nothing but a cash grab.........amazing, which car emits more emissions into the air....the guy that drives his corrolla daily and puts on 30,000 kms a year or our toys that see 3000 kms a year?? Scam !! I hope this gets dropped like B.C. did !!!
Manny, you need to make friends with an e-test guy
Looking forward to meeting with you and Arun to discuss your build .
We have been great success with Arun's grinds and so have a lot of people all the over the US and Canada .
We will meeting and exceed your expectations .
I will be back on March 10th and we can meet the following Saturday March 16th at the shop .
Just let me what time please .
#31
Race Director
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 847 Likes
on
723 Posts
I wanted to point out that some of the wording being passed on is quite alarmist.
You can pass with one monitor showing not ready (or 2 from 1998 to 2000). So, your rear O2's being off would still pass as long as all the other monitors show as passed.
I've been running high flow cats for at least 20k with the rear O2 sensors still enabled and the car hasn't thrown any codes and it passes the catalyst readiness test. So, stating the car will fail with high flow cats is not a fact. I actually think the new test is easier to pass in this sense. Pass the other monitors and you can pass an emissions test without cats.
The right answer is you connect a scanner on your car and check it. If you have no CEL and all but 1 monitor show as passed then you're laughing. And the bonus is that you know 100% that you will pass. You can't say that about the sniffer test.
If you've had your vehicle tuned by any tuner (on the dyno or just a a hand held programmer) chances are your rear o2 sensors have been disabled.
This means, you'll fail the new test because it requires that your rear o2 sensors are enabled (for readiness).
This means, you'll fail the new test because it requires that your rear o2 sensors are enabled (for readiness).
It basically boils down to how efficient your catalytic converters are.If you have high flow cats installed, you may have passed emissions tests with flying colours in the past, however you'll fail now (the new test is much more demanding of your catalytic converters).
How do I know if I'll pass the new emissions test?
#32
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Breslau Ontario
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wanted to point out that some of the wording being passed on is quite alarmist.
You can pass with one monitor showing not ready (or 2 from 1998 to 2000). So, your rear O2's being off would still pass as long as all the other monitors show as passed.
I've been running high flow cats for at least 20k with the rear O2 sensors still enabled and the car hasn't thrown any codes and it passes the catalyst readiness test. So, stating the car will fail with high flow cats is not a fact. I actually think the new test is easier to pass in this sense. Pass the other monitors and you can pass an emissions test without cats.
The right answer is you connect a scanner on your car and check it. If you have no CEL and all but 1 monitor show as passed then you're laughing. And the bonus is that you know 100% that you will pass. You can't say that about the sniffer test.
You can pass with one monitor showing not ready (or 2 from 1998 to 2000). So, your rear O2's being off would still pass as long as all the other monitors show as passed.
I've been running high flow cats for at least 20k with the rear O2 sensors still enabled and the car hasn't thrown any codes and it passes the catalyst readiness test. So, stating the car will fail with high flow cats is not a fact. I actually think the new test is easier to pass in this sense. Pass the other monitors and you can pass an emissions test without cats.
The right answer is you connect a scanner on your car and check it. If you have no CEL and all but 1 monitor show as passed then you're laughing. And the bonus is that you know 100% that you will pass. You can't say that about the sniffer test.
And you are a licensed emissions Technician where ?
And you are a licensed mechanic where ?
I was just at my friend's Active Green & Ross shop a couple of hours ago , that has been performing the new tests since day 1 , and the fail rate's are through the roof . As a matter of fact his exact statement was that they have had more fails in 2 months than all of last year , and they do a ton of etests .
So as much as you think your statement is all correct it is not , and people are failing even with using hand held scanners prior .
Again , my state was made to alert people that have had performance type of work done to get it checked out before having the test done and save themselves a headache
#33
Race Director
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 847 Likes
on
723 Posts
The new e-test checks for 2 things. No CEL and the OBDII monitors showing as passed. No CEL and all but 1 OBDII monitor showing as passed is a e-test pass. It's that simple. Check the car with a scanner and it will pass the e-test if you if meets these requirements.
#34
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Breslau Ontario
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have you yourself done this on any cars ?
#35
Race Director
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 847 Likes
on
723 Posts
Try going directly to the source. It's explained there.
http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/environment...lean/index.htm
There is actually a 3rd requirement. No stored codes. Just as easy to check for as the other 2.
http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/environment...lean/index.htm
There is actually a 3rd requirement. No stored codes. Just as easy to check for as the other 2.
Last edited by lionelhutz; 02-27-2013 at 08:01 PM.
#36
Wow, utterly amazing that we have come to this now. Check out the MOE's suggestions on how to pass the test.
Let the engine idle in DRIVE? What if the car is a manual trans? 10min high way speeds, 20 mins stop and go... how does one plan such a thing, what if its 40 mins to the highway?
These people need to be put in check. Ridiculous doesn't begin to cover the issue.
Let the engine idle in DRIVE? What if the car is a manual trans? 10min high way speeds, 20 mins stop and go... how does one plan such a thing, what if its 40 mins to the highway?
These people need to be put in check. Ridiculous doesn't begin to cover the issue.
#37
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Breslau Ontario
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, utterly amazing that we have come to this now. Check out the MOE's suggestions on how to pass the test.
Let the engine idle in DRIVE? What if the car is a manual trans? 10min high way speeds, 20 mins stop and go... how does one plan such a thing, what if its 40 mins to the highway?
These people need to be put in check. Ridiculous doesn't begin to cover the issue.
Let the engine idle in DRIVE? What if the car is a manual trans? 10min high way speeds, 20 mins stop and go... how does one plan such a thing, what if its 40 mins to the highway?
These people need to be put in check. Ridiculous doesn't begin to cover the issue.
Now their contracts are all for 65 months , that tells me that this will not last . B.C scrapped it all together and many other places followed suit .
It just another Ontario another cash grab
Last edited by Dasilvamotorsports; 02-27-2013 at 08:11 PM.
#38
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Breslau Ontario
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Try going directly to the source. It's explained there.
http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/environment...lean/index.htm
There is actually a 3rd requirement. No stored codes. Just as easy to check for as the other 2.
http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/environment...lean/index.htm
There is actually a 3rd requirement. No stored codes. Just as easy to check for as the other 2.
We can read and surmise all that you want , but the fact is that those performing the tests in the field have very different results to report .
My reports are first hand and from the field
#39
Race Director
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 847 Likes
on
723 Posts
Wow, utterly amazing that we have come to this now. Check out the MOE's suggestions on how to pass the test.
Let the engine idle in DRIVE? What if the car is a manual trans? 10min high way speeds, 20 mins stop and go... how does one plan such a thing, what if its 40 mins to the highway?
These people need to be put in check. Ridiculous doesn't begin to cover the issue.
Let the engine idle in DRIVE? What if the car is a manual trans? 10min high way speeds, 20 mins stop and go... how does one plan such a thing, what if its 40 mins to the highway?
These people need to be put in check. Ridiculous doesn't begin to cover the issue.
Be hopeful there will be enough issues it will get dropped completely.
#40
I will tell you that the service shops are loving this new system , the money its generating in repairs is insane .
Now their contracts are all for 65 months , that tells me that this will not last . B.C scrapped it all together and many other places followed suit .
It only another cash grab
Now their contracts are all for 65 months , that tells me that this will not last . B.C scrapped it all together and many other places followed suit .
It only another cash grab