Vette vs. supra
My personal interest is in the engineering of the machine itself. I design and build more than I drive and I want to understand the art and science behind the race more than I want to be on the track. I feel that the best engineer is the one who spends the leaste amount of money and does the most with it. Perhaps Ford or Toyota has that crown… I don’t care to address that particular angle in depth in this post. What I want to know is what the hell is the deal with the Supra…
Are Supras truly as fast as the supra community claims them to be? I’m enough of an engineer to know that it is all about 2 factors. First is burning fuel to make power and the second, getting that power to the ground… So looking at the Supra ; I see it takes 30-45 pounds of boost and with the right fuel pump could perform as well as an engine 2 to three times its size. But that would only put it on par with a vette running light boost. SO where in the hell are these 6 and 7 second quarter mile times coming from and how are they making 1000+ HP on 30 pounds (2 atm) of boost? 2 atm = 3x the stock displacement/power that should be around 700 Hp.
My first theory: Most supra owners are younger and less mature as such, so I’m willing to make an assumption that they are more likely to exaggerate or omit details (lie). Now don’t get all excited if you read this and feel I’m pointing a finger at you. I’m 42 and raised my 1st son, been around many others And most of all I was 21 once myself as were all my friends, so I can look back with a laugh and say that 21 year old and such age young men tend to be a bit more full of **** on average than they will be in the following years yet to come… Maybe they are sliding in 1/8 mile track times and doing some what if calculations to report HP (like what if I burned 80lbs per hour with each of 6 injectors and it was all translated to HP…
Second theory: Japanese engineering is so far advanced that we ought to hire them.
I know it is a forged motor and all: And what each car weighs… so I’m looking for some sort of sage knowledge. I can’t see all the facts and engineering lining up. The fastest corvette is in the 9s with 1500 HP. Weighs in a little less than the Supra and has plenty of good drag radials to choose from. Am I to believe that even a middle of the pack twin turbo supra smokes it?
But some of them can be VERY fast, especially on a high speed highway run.
If you've ever heard of the telephone game, well, that clearly has applied to this particular car. It's starts with a car that ran 11s on stock turbos with aftermarket cams and race gas (true) and by the time the story makes it to the interwebz somehow morphs it's way into a car that ran 7s at full weight on a 100% stock motor and pump gas.

And if you've ever heard of the term "fanboy", it was likely invented because of this one Toyota LOL.

There are still far more 11 second Toyota Supras then there are 9 second ones. And even fewer true 8 and 7 second ones, though they certainly do exist.
And MONEY.
1) the fastest Corvette is not only in the 9s and 2) modern era Corvettes have gone mid-low 8s with less than 1000rwhp.
I don't even think the one that has gone 7s (yes, 7s (atomicfusion's C6 Z06)) has a full 1500rwhp.
I believe that the "1500hp" car you might be referring to is the LMR C6 ZR1 that recently went 9.6@147mph? Well as it turns out someone on You Tube screwed up royally in posting that with totally false information as that car is making NO WHERE NEAR 1500hp. Probably closer to 885hp and that's at the crank (likely less than 790 at the wheels) so that 9.6 is well within the range of what it should be running. And do keep in mind that is a total street car, air conditioning, power windows, stereo and all.
You want to see some fast Corvettes, check these out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yefn-...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92PFmC4sBWA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=...ture=endscreen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsjnEVkaVyI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BaMRXpIwJ4
Some are supercharged, some are turbocharged and one even did it with nitrous but consistent 8s are no longer out of reach for a properly built late model Corvette.
Last edited by Tsab; Jan 3, 2012 at 09:24 AM.
Last edited by Tsab; Jan 3, 2012 at 10:39 AM.
the Toyota didn't sell well here at all so it was dropped and not long after that ceased production entirely even in it's home market.That's what happens to cars that are sales failures.
Stock for Stock a typical Mark IV would have its hands full with a LT1 ZF6 C4 Corvette for competition in comparable model years.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rt6D3...D9EF0FA93E90F7
Granted they maybe a bit biased but this IS Corvette Forum.
Once you start modifying it comes down to who has more money and who has more knowledge to build a faster car. Then there is the issue of driver...
Another interesting article: http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/co...orsepower-club
Last edited by 93Rubie; Jan 3, 2012 at 07:13 PM.
Yes at the time that was pretty quick for a stock car and like most boosted factory cars it could be modified faster easily enough but it wasn't exactly a cheap car either.
At one point they stickered for over $45k, and this was the mid '90s!
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Regards,
Steve
Last edited by Tsab; Jan 5, 2012 at 12:40 AM.
But here is a Local Model (she) runs a Supra about 9.0 Flat over 150+MPH... I have seen her and her car before. Very impressive. google her... you will like :-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df46t...feature=fvwrel
However... I have witness Paul Major run his Z06 (granted not a IRS rear) before the crash...and he was going 200mph
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xa-YzFXm8Js
When I do "research" it is very difficult to separate the Bull Sh** from the facts. Nothing I have found on the internet can compare to the knowledge people who have been at the tracks for decades have. So please understand I'm looking for what I don't have (first hand knowledge). The post from supra owners often make outrages claims.
Given all you know, if you had simply to win a drag race and had 30k to spend under the hood, would you go with the supra or a corvette. and why?
Don't get hung up on side tracks (the vette is a better car in so many other ways). I'm just exploring tis one facet...
Thanks for reading.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/perf...uick-list.html
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c5-z...list-only.html
The same car has since gone 9.3s and mid-high 140s with a 388 cubic inch motor, still NA, still street drivable.
But here is a Local Model (she) runs a Supra about 9.0 Flat over 150+MPH... I have seen her and her car before. Very impressive. google her... you will like :-)
I was there in person to witness Tim Lynch's record run. Amazing that the car runs low 6 sec on gasoline.
Let me just say that in my opinion there is nothing impressive about anything Toyota. The little Hondas that run 10's and nines is impressive. Its pretty amazing what they get out of those little engines.
Last edited by Tsab; Jan 7, 2012 at 12:43 PM.
From my perspective Corvette, Mustang, or Supra, if you're not using a stock block it changes the game. I don't think a stock block ever made those numbers. Yet I've always been sympathetic to bending the rules for the LS-X block. What was Tims block?
This isn't my thread and I really don't want to Hijack the OP. If you didn't happen to read the OP's original post, most of it is copied below. Ok all I’m just whipping out the measuring sticks here, so if that offends you than don’t read on.
My personal interest is in the engineering of the machine itself. I design and build more than I drive and I want to understand the art and science behind the race more than I want to be on the track. I feel that the best engineer is the one who spends the leaste amount of money and does the most with it. Perhaps Ford or Toyota has that crown… I don’t care to address that particular angle in depth in this post. What I want to know is what the hell is the deal with the Supra…
Are Supras truly as fast as the supra community claims them to be? I’m enough of an engineer to know that it is all about 2 factors. First is burning fuel to make power and the second, getting that power to the ground… So looking at the Supra ; I see it takes 30-45 pounds of boost and with the right fuel pump could perform as well as an engine 2 to three times its size. But that would only put it on par with a vette running light boost. SO where in the hell are these 6 and 7 second quarter mile times coming from and how are they making 1000+ HP on 30 pounds (2 atm) of boost? 2 atm = 3x the stock displacement/power that should be around 700 Hp.
My first theory: Most supra owners are younger and less mature as such, so I’m willing to make an assumption that they are more likely to exaggerate or omit details (lie). Now don’t get all excited if you read this and feel I’m pointing a finger at you. I’m 42 and raised my 1st son, been around many others And most of all I was 21 once myself as were all my friends, so I can look back with a laugh and say that 21 year old and such age young men tend to be a bit more full of **** on average than they will be in the following years yet to come… Maybe they are sliding in 1/8 mile track times and doing some what if calculations to report HP (like what if I burned 80lbs per hour with each of 6 injectors and it was all translated to HP…
Last edited by Tsab; Jan 8, 2012 at 07:01 PM.
This isn't my thread and I really don't want to Hijack the OP. If you didn't happen to read the OP's original post, most of it is copied below.

















