When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I was at the shop last night checking out my new JE pistons. They were saying that I will need to consider a solid axle for my car because I should be in able to run 10's and I will be illegal going that quick with my IRS.
I know there are a lot of you here running 10's & 11's with some even in the 9's. Are you guys running into any problems with this ? I do have the half shaft safety loops installed for what it's worth.
IRS is only legal to 10.99 except in a C5. This is because a C5 has upper and lower control arms.
C4 IRS's are legal down to any ET you care to run it. Halfshaft loops are required to dip below 11.00. C3's require the conversion to solid axle at the same point. Rumors! Buy the book. Good luck, and...
hate to break this to you but our 68 NHRA A/SA still has teh IRS and passes tech and run's mid 10's :D
I checked this out. Under section, 5A, "Stock Cars" (as in cars running NHRA stock classes), There is no mention of the necessity to change to a solid axle. Only that it is permitted. Since I, and most of the readers and participants of this secton, are bracket racers, the rule I am refering to is in secton, 1A, "E.T. Handicap Racing". That section of the rule book specifically cites 1963 -1982 Corvettes as needing a solid axle at 10.99. If it was meant to cover C4's, it would have said 1963-1996. It doesn't. IRS cars (not just Corvettes) that don't require a solid axle at 10.99, DO require halfshaft loops at 10.99. I hope this helps to clear things up. Buy the book! Good luck, and...
RACE ON!!!
PS. I am not saying how any given track will treat any particular racer. Different tracks apply the rules differently. I am merely citing what is printed in the "NHRA Rulebook". Your mileage may vary.
From: I have no tolerence for liberals and fools, but sometimes i repeat myself
CI 3-5-7-8-9 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '08
Re: NHRA......ET. vs IRS ? (CFI-EFI)
hate to break this to you but our 68 NHRA A/SA still has teh IRS and passes tech and run's mid 10's :D I checked this out. Under section, 5A, Stock Cars (as in cars running NHRA stock classes), There is no mention of the necessity to change to a solid axle. Only that it is permitted. Since I, and most of the readers and participants of this secton of the forum are bracket racers, the rule I am refering to is in secton, 1A, E.T. Handicap Racing. That section of the rule book specifically cites 1963 -1982 Corvettes as need a solid axle at 10.99. If it was meant to cover C4's, it would have said 1963-1996. It doesn't. IRS cars (not just Corvettes) that don't require a solid axle at 10.99, DO require halfshaft loops at 10.99. I hope this helps to clear things up. Buy the book! Good luck, and...
RACE ON!!!
yea i race a stocker and don't have a rule book :rolleyes: :lol: :jester
i have read that section of the book, and there is a kit offered by Tom's differential in California that makes a 63-82 rear legal :thumbs: http://www.tomsdifferentials.com/cat24.htm
From: I have no tolerence for liberals and fools, but sometimes i repeat myself
CI 3-5-7-8-9 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '08
Re: NHRA......ET. vs IRS ? (CFI-EFI)
i have read that section of the book, and there is a kit offered by Tom's differential in California that makes a 63-82 rear legal :thumbs: The rulebook makes no mention of upgrading the axle, simply the replacement. I don't know why this wouldn't be acceptable, though.
RACE ON!!!
if you read and re-read it says that any IRS w/o upper and lower control arms is illegal, it gives the STOCK 63-82 as an EXAMPLE. From my understanding with Tom's kit it is legal as fast as you wanna go
I have the Book and I stand by my original post I have gone thru tons of BS with division 1 and as far as NHRA in my neck of the woods is concerned I am correct. If you get away with it good for you :cheers:
Well it seems that it's written in the book that I will need a solid axle, but it may depend upon the track. So I guess I will go to the track next year and see what they say :rolleyes: .
I have upgraded my inner side axles to Tom's 30 spline along with the safety loops, so I have stepped things up back there for some safety :)
From: I have no tolerence for liberals and fools, but sometimes i repeat myself
CI 3-5-7-8-9 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '08
Re: NHRA......ET. vs IRS ? (Major Spray)
I have the Toms Third Member setup in my mid year it is bullet proof but not legal below 10.99.
Good Luck
the upper control arms that Tom's sells make the 63-82 rear NHRA legal, i have spoke with both Div2 and Div 4 tech people about that on several occasions. We were looking at installing them on our stocker just for safety reasons. They explained that they would be legal in brackets, or in SuperStock, but not in Stock because it alters the suspension design
I have the Toms Third Member setup in my mid year it is bullet proof but not legal below 10.99.
Good Luck the upper control arms that Tom's sells make the 63-82 rear NHRA legal, i have spoke with both Div2 and Div 4 tech people about that on several occasions. We were looking at installing them on our stocker just for safety reasons. They explained that they would be legal in brackets, or in SuperStock, but not in Stock because it alters the suspension design
I didn't know that Tom's made upper control arms for this aplication thanks for the Info. :cheers:
From: I have no tolerence for liberals and fools, but sometimes i repeat myself
CI 3-5-7-8-9 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '08
Re: NHRA......ET. vs IRS ? (Major Spray)
I have the Toms Third Member setup in my mid year it is bullet proof but not legal below 10.99.
Good Luck the upper control arms that Tom's sells make the 63-82 rear NHRA legal, i have spoke with both Div2 and Div 4 tech people about that on several occasions. We were looking at installing them on our stocker just for safety reasons. They explained that they would be legal in brackets, or in SuperStock, but not in Stock because it alters the suspension design
I didn't know that Tom's made upper control arms for this aplication thanks for the Info. :cheers:
:thumbs: no problem, follow the link in my earlier post
The rulebook makes no mention of upgrading the axle, simply the replacement. I don't know why this wouldn't be acceptable, though.
RACE ON!!!
if you read and re-read it says that any IRS w/o upper and lower control arms is illegal, it gives the STOCK 63-82 as an EXAMPLE. From my understanding with Tom's kit it is legal as fast as you wanna go
I think we are in agreement, here. I understand that the book only cites the C3 as an EXAMPLE. As in the above quote, the book makes no mention of correcting the problem, only changing the whole rear set up. I think the "Tom's" solution is a great one. You mentioned that NHRA won't allow the "Tom's" upper bar in the stock classes. In the link you provided even Tom's warns that it isn't legal in stock. IDEA! Would NHRA allow you to simply remove the bar, only, to run stock? It would leave some non-stock brackets on the car, but wouldn't effectively "alter" the rear suspension action. This would allow for a fairly quick change over between stock and bracket events. Good luck, and...