CHP article
The Little "M" block supports a bore of up to 4.185" and a stroke of 3.875". After doing some math, I found that a 4.175" bore and a 3.5" stroke will get you 383.3 CID. Forgetting about part availability for the moment (I am not sure how many companies make a piston for a 4.175" bore short of custom making them and the only 3.5" crankshafts I can find are two piece rear mains), how would the bored out 383 compare to the standard, stroked 383? Pros/Cons of each setup?
Lets say the configuration is a 200cc head with Miniram intake (or a single plane intake). The camshaft I am unsure about since the RPM range might be different with the smaller stroked engine. I am not sure if the same profile camshaft would benefit each engine the same or if both engines would need a completely different camshaft profile to compliment it, so that is a wildcard.
Anyone running a large bore, small stroke engine V8?
The Little "M" block supports a bore of up to 4.185" and a stroke of 3.875". After doing some math, I found that a 4.175" bore and a 3.5" stroke will get you 383.3 CID. Forgetting about part availability for the moment (I am not sure how many companies make a piston for a 4.175" bore short of custom making them and the only 3.5" crankshafts I can find are two piece rear mains), how would the bored out 383 compare to the standard, stroked 383? Pros/Cons of each setup?
Lets say the configuration is a 200cc head with Miniram intake (or a single plane intake). The camshaft I am unsure about since the RPM range might be different with the smaller stroked engine. I am not sure if the same profile camshaft would benefit each engine the same or if both engines would need a completely different camshaft profile to compliment it, so that is a wildcard.
Anyone running a large bore, small stroke engine V8?
1.-Large(r) bore x short(er) stroke=low torque/high RPM HP
2.-Small(er) bore x long(er) stroke=high torque/low RPM HP.
It really takes a whole bunch much more defining, but that equation has been the "rule-of-thumb" since gasoline units have been around.
This is the reason very few units, both SB's and BB's, are using "short" strokes today. The basic SB is on the 383" unit based on the 4.000" bore platform and the basic BB is on the 540" unit based on the 4.500" bore platform. Thanks Gary in N.Y.
P.S. If you choose a "short" stroke unit you'd best have "light-weight" vehicle to place it in. Short stroke, light vehicle, vs. long stroke, heavy vehicle, it's kinda' been the "standard" for years now!
1.-Large(r) bore x short(er) stroke=low torque/high RPM HP
2.-Small(er) bore x long(er) stroke=high torque/low RPM HP
The HRM article showed that the bias's attributed to "big bore/short stroke" vs "small bore/long stroke" engines isn't as viable as once believed (at least by me). There is no doubt that piston speed and it's attending friction is less at any given rpm level, with a shorter stroke.
The old rule of "there is no substitute for cubic inches", still reigns. Unless you HAVE to have a 383 to meet some class rules, take the bigger bore block and stuff the longest arm you can afford into that sucker.
I have a Chevy Bow Tie block that I have left at a 4.125" bore, for strength and future clean ups, and put a 4.00" crank into for 427 CID.
RACE ON!!!
I must say, the 427 sounds mighty tempting though!
The big bore, small stroke SBC is actually a popular combo and a "class" size motor for the circle track guys. Typically known as a 377 (4.155 bore x 3.48" stroke), you will find performance suppliers have all the parts to support this motor. The old school way to build this motor was to take a 400 block and get oversized bearings to allow the 400 journals to fit a 350 crank. (The bearings are off the shelf stuff.) With aftermarket blocks, you buy the small (350) journal Dart, Motown, or Bowtie block and directly drop in a 3.48" crank, well actually a 3.5" crank cause that's what the aftermarket crank grinders support. You will then find lots of catalog pistons to support this motor at a 1.25" pin height that mate up with a 6" rod and a 9" deck height.
This is typically used as a high RPM motor. For a street motor I'd go for the cubes. I am going to try a 374 (4.125" bore x 3.5" stroke) for autocrossing.

Chris.
And for $22.5k, they can keep it. Besides, that is most likely a stroked 377 (4" bore with a 3.75" stroke).Still, 1.8HP per cubic inch is pretty impressive. Wonder what octane fuel it requires?
They also have close ties to AFR. If you check out AFR's website, American Speed has built several of their dyno-tested samples.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
They also have close ties to AFR. If you check out AFR's website, American Speed has built several of their dyno-tested samples.
While it is illegal a lot of us from time to time are guilty of street racing and in that case no class you run what you brung and you better hope you brung enough.
I must say, the 427 sounds mighty tempting though!

I like the idea of having a big bore small stroke high rev engine, but then again I am selling my vette and going for something completely different.
MAtt

















