When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
After looking at Monty's "crowded" (but beautiful) engine compartment with the twin turbos and wondering if I could find something more interesting than the "run of the mill" single block EFI setup ... was wondering last night about plumbing a front mount 6-71 blower to a custom FI manifold. Maybe use one of the Stealth-Ram bases with a custom plenum and twin throttle bodies. With the motor set-back I could probably stick one in. Anyone seen one recently or know if they even still exist? I've never seen one close enough to know how they mount to the motor (or do they mount to the chassis).
Or should I just put on the funny jacket with the extra long arms and go back to sleep :)
Or should I just put on the funny jacket with the extra long arms and go back to sleep :)
-Greg
:yesnod:
Actually, I think I know what you are talking about. Mounting the 6/8/14-71 blower in front of the engine, and have some tubes run up and into the intake?
There was an older/vintage dragster that had this set up. I want say it had something to do with moon/mooneye's stuff. It, or a copy is sitting in a PAW shop in the next town over from me.
Wow, that's pretty cool looking. I have never seen that before.
Seems like a centrifugal or Whipple supercharger would be easier to package though. It looks like you'd have to set the engine back a couple of feet to get that front mount roots SC to fit?
The one in the photo looks to me like a 14-71? A 6-71 isnt that long, shorter than a SBC block. A 4-71 at modest boost would be even shorter. And I do probably have close to 2 feet to work with, the motor is back about 10" behind the cross member, and the radiator has been moved forward and down.
Possible ? Don't know. May have to ask my brother to hit the Pomona swap meet a couple of times this summer and see if anything shows up.
Re: Front Blower Drive - getting silly ? (BrianCunningham)
Yep, the blower Bentlies were probably the first to do that. Any relation to the Cunningham who ran at Lemans? Went to his musieum in So Cal years ago, lots of nice cars. Can't remember the curator's name, but he was a welath of info and lots of fun to talk with.
From: Boston, Dallas, Detroit, SoCal, back to Boston MA
Re: Front Blower Drive - getting silly ? (GregP)
No relation, but if they want to send me an inheritance check, by all means! :D
BTW Peter Cunningham in running the Speed WC
and the family is coming out with a new street car.
Back to the subject, MG made a little "Poor Man's" version of the car.
Same setup, sticking out the front radiator grill.
And Mercedes did a version with a clutch, so it could be turned on when good gasoline, kinda rare back then was available.
Greg,wouldn't a VORTEC style blower be easier to mount and to plumb with just as good results?.....not an expert talking,just an enthusiastic amateur...john :cheers: :chevy
Re: Front Blower Drive - getting silly ? (BrianCunningham)
Sorry, reply was intened to jdunne asking about the centrifugal blowers. Forgot that the reply button on each post doesn't tag "who's" reply your replying to.
Re: Front Blower Drive - getting silly ? (HunterRose)
Hmm, or was it done this way to prevent detonation/reversion from blowing up the blower?
I've read that the belt pulley can put a lot of pressure on the front of the crank and invokes some limitations in the amount of boost used, this setup may get around that problem. :cool: