Engine Mods Outrageous Builds, High-Horsepower Modifications, strokers, and big cams for the Corvette

Question for fellow machinists/professional engine builders...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2003 | 01:54 PM
  #1  
Tom454's Avatar
Tom454
Thread Starter
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 6,134
Likes: 46
From: Raleigh North Carolina
Default Question for fellow machinists/professional engine builders...

I have been using Clevite bearings for a long, long time (professionally).
I have had a problem with Clevite cam bearings in the last 3 Chevy SB engines I built.
The bearings fit fine on the cam, but when I press them into the bearing bores, they are too tight on the cam. On one engine, I only had a problem with #1 bearing. On the current engine, I had a problem with #5, and #3. I bought a second set, and now I am having a problem only with #1. I have never had these issues in the past... Clevite cam bearings just pressed right in, and the cam spun perfectly. Lately, every engine I do, I have problems with the Clevites. Anyone else have these issues?

Just for grins, I honed the #1 bearing to get the cam to fit.... but this is not acceptable... they should just plug-n-play.

I tried 3 different cams in the same bearing... all 3 were too tight, one is a brand new cam. The cam journals are in spec.
The bearing was tight only along one edge... so I popped it out & reversed it... the problem followed the edge to its new orientation. So, it's not a block problem... definitely the bearings. I have a good KD cam bearing installer set that I've been using for over 20 years... never had a problem with cam bearings until recently.

The tool prevents the shells from getting nicked or deformed.

3 blocks... 5 sets of Clevites ($10 sets)... all problematic.
These engines don't warrant anything better than a $10 set.
Any ideas? Are they having manufacturing issues?
I checked the blocks for burrs, but not for core shift.

Please... I need input from people who actually install the bearings.... not people who had them installed by someone else. An unscrupulous mechanic might hone ill-fitting bearings just to get the engine finished and collect the money.... so the owner would never know.

I need to know if anyone else is having this problem so I can either switch to a different brand, or, look for a different cause.


Tom
Reply
Old May 13, 2003 | 03:22 PM
  #2  
ram82fire's Avatar
ram82fire
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: spring city pa
Default Re: Question for fellow machinists/professional engine builders... (Tom454)

Are you honing the bearing insert after installation ,, or honing the hole itself ? I would not hone an insert myself , as the bearing layer would become contaminated with grit from the hone . I always intall the front bearing from the rear of the engine , as you well know I am sure installing cam bearings is a pia ! I once ran into a damaged cam bore on a 312 57 t bird engine ,,, I wound up having the hole machined oversize and I machined a bearing insert from billet stock . It was a numbers matching car in show condition so the owner was glad to pay . I have run into some snug fits on these chevs before , but nothing that would cause problems .

Gman
Reply
Old May 13, 2003 | 04:58 PM
  #3  
Kingt's Avatar
Kingt
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 276
Likes: 1
From: Arlington Texas
Default Re: Question for fellow machinists/professional engine builders... (ram82fire)

Tom:
I too have been using clevite bearings for many years. However, I have not recently experienced the problems you mentioned . About ten to fifteen years ago I had problems with certain bearings as you mentioned. At that time I replaced the offending bearings. Perhaps it's a manufacturing issue with a certain lot. I havent looked but there may be a lot number on the bearings or the boxes they are shipped in. I currently use a cam bearing installation tool I machined from stainless. I just installed cam bearings in a SB last week and had no problems.
Reply
Old May 13, 2003 | 06:14 PM
  #4  
clem zahrobsky's Avatar
clem zahrobsky
Le Mans Master
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,744
Likes: 1
From: delmont pa
Cruise-In I Veteran
Cruise-In II Veteran
Default Re: Question for fellow machinists/professional engine builders... (Tom454)

i had this problem 1 time years ago so after that i always used a small cly hone to just touch up the cam bearing bores in the block to make sure there are no nicks or rought spots in the bores. the time i had a problem i had to hand scrape the ID of the cam bearing to get the cam to fit correctly because the rotating assy was already in the block so trying to get the # 4 bearing insert in and out of the block to scrape was a bitch. i always checked for cam fit before engine assy after that. :mad :chevy


[Modified by clem zahrobsky, 6:15 PM 5/13/2003]


[Modified by clem zahrobsky, 6:17 PM 5/13/2003]
Reply
Old May 14, 2003 | 09:04 AM
  #5  
Tom454's Avatar
Tom454
Thread Starter
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 6,134
Likes: 46
From: Raleigh North Carolina
Default Re: Question for fellow machinists/professional engine builders... (clem zahrobsky)

Ram82fire...
I honed the bearing just to see how much the ID was off from spec.
It's trash now.

Clem...
The crank is already in the block with a new seal, so I don't want to pull the crank. I failed to test fit the cam in the new bearings before I dropped the crank in. My bad... I assumed it (new 327/350 cam) would fit okay because the old cam spun freely when I removed it.

Kingt... did you use $10 Clevites on that SB you just put together?

I had trhe same problems with a 350, a 305, and now a 327.
Yet, I did two 302 Fords (Clevites) and an import in between with no problems.

Reply
Old May 14, 2003 | 05:29 PM
  #6  
Kingt's Avatar
Kingt
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 276
Likes: 1
From: Arlington Texas
Default Re: Question for fellow machinists/professional engine builders... (Tom454)

Yes, they were the $10 bearings.
Reply
Old May 14, 2003 | 11:34 PM
  #7  
l78vetteman's Avatar
l78vetteman
Instructor
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
Default Re: Question for fellow machinists/professional engine builders... (Kingt)

I just went through this one with my 396. After measuring the bearing shell thickness, I found that they are not all the same. The middle cam bearings are slightly smaller in outside diameter. I assume that when they bore bearing journals in the block at the factory, the outter bearing bores are slightly bigger so that they can get the tool in and out?? Anyway, if you put the bigger bearings in the outer bores, you should eliminate the problem you are having.

Am I out to lunch, or has anyone else experienced this?

Once I put my bearings in the right locations, my cam turned freely.

Rob
Reply
Old May 15, 2003 | 08:44 AM
  #8  
Tom454's Avatar
Tom454
Thread Starter
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 6,134
Likes: 46
From: Raleigh North Carolina
Default Re: Question for fellow machinists/professional engine builders... (l78vetteman)

That's correct... you can't just press the shells into the bores. They are "positional". Clevite provides a sheet in their package that tells you which bearing goes into which bore. The SBC package (SH290S) contains one bearing for #1 position, two bearings for #2 & #5 positions, and two bearings for #3 & #4 positions. You have to press each bearing into the correct bore position. The Clevite bearings are clearly marked, so no measuring should be required.

Also, the diameter of the SBC block bores does not correspond to the diameters of the cam journals front-to-back. For example, you cannot slide the bearing shell marked for position #5 over the #1 journal on the actual camshaft... the #5 bearing is smaller than the #1 bearing/journal.

Some cams are cut with all bearing journals identical. Some cams have a decreasing diameter going from #1 (front) to #5 (rear). Depends on the specific engine.
The inside diameter of each bearing shell is matched to a particular cam journal in this case. But... the ID and the "thickness" of the shell are not necessarily related. The ID of the bores in the block is independent and can vary according to its own schedule.

Maybe Clevites packaging is wrong though... I'll mic the next set to see what is going on.
The problem is that they do compress substantially when they are pressed into the block bores. They can fit fine when you slide them over the cam journals, but when compressed, they can be too tight on the cam. This is what is happening in this case. They all fit fine on their respective cam journals, but when I press them into the block, some are too tight, and the cam binds significantly.

The last 305 I did, I only had a problem with #1 bearing... I complained to my vendor, and he gave me another set. I pressed out #1, and pressed in only a new #1 shell, and the problem went away. This is why I suspect the product, and not the method.

Thanks for the suggestion.

Tom
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-7

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
Old May 20, 2003 | 03:16 PM
  #9  
Tom454's Avatar
Tom454
Thread Starter
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 6,134
Likes: 46
From: Raleigh North Carolina
Default Re: Question for fellow machinists/professional engine builders... (Tom454)

Found this at Clevites web site... under tech stuff...

To meet the demands of higher loads and operating temperatures in modern engines as well as the requirements imposed by high performance, babbitt has been replaced by an alloy of aluminum. This aluminum alloy is much stronger than babbitt and will withstand several times the load which causes babbitt to fatigue or extrude. However, this added strength is obtained at the expense of some of the more forgiving properties of babbitt. The aluminum alloy is harder, making it somewhat less compatible with dirt, misalignment and marginal lubrication. This is typical of the compromises or trade offs that are frequently necessary when selecting a bearing material to suit the requirements of a specific application and in this case, higher loading.

Typically, whenever a higher level of loading is encountered, greater precision is required to maintain reliability. Conditions such as cleanliness, alignment, clearances, journal surface finishes and lubrication must all be controlled more closely. Following are some recommendations to help optimize performance when using aluminum alloy camshaft bearings.

So... I will assume I need to start align-boring the cam bearing holes on a regular basis.
She It.

Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Question for fellow machinists/professional engine builders...





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:08 AM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE