When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a 99 FRC and no matter what mod I do it always under performs.Just a few examples:
(old setup)
Stage II H/C w/MTI X-1 Cam
TPIS 1 3/4 LT w/Hi-flow cats
3.90 gears w/harden output shafts
Corsa
total HP:390RWHP
added 150 TNT kit 530Rwhp
(new setup)
408 iron block 10.8-1 CR
Lunati Crank
Lunadi Rods
Wiesco Pistons
Stage III heads
MTI S-1 Cam
90/90 Fast intake
1 7/8 Kooks
Hi-flow cats
Corsa
3.90 gears w/harden output shafts
480RWHP
All the work has been done by MTI in Houston.
What could be causing the car to not put out the HP it should?
Last edited by HIGH_INTREST; Aug 17, 2005 at 08:40 PM.
Dont feel too bad Shawn... My MTI stage 2e heads and X1 cam only made 400 rwhp with the stock 3.42. I wonder what your Iron Block makes for torque? 480 isnt stellar but its no slouch especially with the 10.8:1 CR. Dont forget that those cats are sucking up the power as well as the 3.90s on the dyno.
I have a 99 FRC and no matter what mod I do it always under performs.Just a few examples:
(old setup)
Stage II H/C w/MTI X-1 Cam
TPIS 1 3/4 LT w/Hi-flow cats
3.90 gears w/harden output shafts
Corsa
total HP:390RWHP
added 150 TNT kit 530Rwhp
(new setup)
408 iron block 10.8-1 CR
Lunati Crank
Lunadi Rods
Wiesco Pistons
Stage III heads
MTI S-1 Cam
90/90 Fast intake
1 7/8 Kooks
Hi-flow cats
Corsa
3.90 gears w/harden output shafts
480RWHP
All the work has been done by MTI in Houston.
What could be causing the car to not put out the HP it should?
hmm, i'm coming from a general performance background, but since you've changed engine setups and according to you its still under what was expected, I'm assuming your running a decent clutch so it can't be the clutch, maybe something is wrong with your transmission? Maybe check your grounding points but that shouldn't be a problem since you have a fairly new car.
What did you use to tune? And how aggressive is the tune? Any dyno charts? Tuning is really key, maybe your tuner felt a conservative tune would be better?
He is using LS1 edit and you might be right about being conservative.I guess it would be better safe than sorry.I am supposed to get the car back w/d-1sc on Saturday w/dyno sheets.I will post them when I get them.I should be in the 700RWHP range.
Your numbers sound on par to me. Keep in mind that many of the numbers you see floating around the internet are total bull.
Mark
Dyno numbers mean absolutely nothing unless they're SAE corrected and smoothed. Plus I think a lot of people think that a G-Tech number is accurate or add up the claimed power increase on their mods.
Ed
The diff in 10.8 and 11.3 cr could be 30rwhp---cats at least 10rwhp and your 390s are costing at least 10rwhp-of course we have no idea what the specs are on your cam but you could be well over 500rwhp with the 3 things mentioned.--also keep in mind the humidity in Houston is the same as FL and no corrected figures are acurate in this kind of humidity we have proven it time and again in Florida--
Dont feel too bad Shawn... My MTI stage 2e heads and X1 cam only made 400 rwhp with the stock 3.42. I wonder what your Iron Block makes for torque? 480 isnt stellar but its no slouch especially with the 10.8:1 CR. Dont forget that those cats are sucking up the power as well as the 3.90s on the dyno.
Chin up Just spray it and be done!!
Yeah I pulled 405/380 w/ Stage IIe's , LTs, Vararam, High Flow Cats, X-pipe, Borlas, and a 224/228 cam through an A4. Got any track times guys?
Everything done there. I think they are very conservative w/ their tunes.
Yeah I pulled 405/380 w/ Stage IIe's , LTs, Vararam, High Flow Cats, X-pipe, Borlas, and a 224/228 cam through an A4. Got any track times guys?
Everything done there. I think they are very conservative w/ their tunes.
I have 409/390 with Cartek Stage II heads a 218/222 cam (old Cartek M cam) with No cats, FLP headers, Stingers, Vararam, LS6 intake and ASP pully, with the stock rear on an MN6
122-123 traps are common when the weather is under 70`, 120-121 when the weather is in the 90's. 130traps with the 125 shot regardless of weather.
I have 409/390 with Cartek Stage II heads a 218/222 cam (old Cartek M cam) with No cats, FLP headers, Stingers, Vararam, LS6 intake and ASP pully, with the stock rear on an MN6
122-123 traps are common when the weather is under 70`, 120-121 when the weather is in the 90's. 130traps with the 125 shot regardless of weather.
The funny thing is I'm not complaining about the times I get it's just it doesn't perform well on the dyno.My car runs:
11.50 @119 on motor
10.80 @128 w/150 shot
Its prolly just a comination of little things man. cats, 3.90 gears, corsa catback maybe, you can add more compression and still run pump, more duration on the cam, and it is kinda hot in Texas right now.
Just little stuff like that can be 30-40rwhp easy.
Oh and I really thing its a BAD idea to put a blower on that exact setup. If nothing else, go with some bigger heads (72cc) and a lil thicker head gasket to get static compression under 10:1.
I think your numbers are right on par. Your H/C package should have been more in my opinion, but your 408ci with the cam and compression seems about right. I am sure your timing is very conservative. If it is above 28 degree's I would suspect closer to 500rwhp. If it is really bothering you pull the heads off and have them flowed by Thunder Racing or someone.
The funny thing is I'm not complaining about the times I get it's just it doesn't perform well on the dyno.My car runs:
11.50 @119 on motor
10.80 @128 w/150 shot
best 60ft was 1.55
I just saw this.. What tires were you running when you ran these times? Also, do you consider yourself a good driver?