When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
There maybe something wrong with the car. Give us a call here at the shop. 763-477-9272. I need to know things like when we did the car, and the orginal owner if it wasn't you. We had a car come in here last week. It was down about 80 horse. One cracked spark plug was the problem. Three dollars later the car made big power again!
I suspect that you are not putting down the 385 rwhp you think you are, and the dyno number is about right. Stock 2002-2004 Z06s get 345-350 rwhp and they run in the low 12s. I realize they are geared a little lower, but not half-a-second worth. Getting your tune re-checked should be interesting. Good luck!
Ed
Thanks Ed. I've decided to get my own tuning software. A friend of mine who's pretty good at tuning is going to help me out. First I'll log the data from the PCM, probably at the track. Then we'll look at it to see if anything looks out of whack. We'll make adjustments and then make a run. The best dyno in the world is the track......no BS! If the tune isn't the problem I'll deal with the shop that did the work. I've been trying to resolve this issue like a gentleman but when you're dealing with someone who could be the missing link your tactics have to change. Stay tuned for more.
From: Buy USA products! Check the label! Employ Americans
never came back to this thread after 3 days has a 95 also. If I had this problem first I would call the tuner second I would look back at the thread for help I have stock injectors and 450/400
Last edited by John Shiels; Oct 7, 2005 at 09:44 PM.
My car has the bigger intake and exhaust valves as well and is a MN6 vs your A4 but my numbers are closer to what you should be. Which intake are you using, if its still the LS1 there is part of your problem.
I find it interesting that you're making a lot more dyno hp & torque than I did with my LS6 ported heads and cam yet I'm going 113mph in the 1/4 mile and that's with a lousy 2.24 60' time. With your 60'ft time and power I would have thought you'd be easily up in the 119/12mph range even with a soft launch. We sure seem to have some contradictory information between the dyno and the track.
I have old design Cartek stage II Heads, small cam (218/222) and average headers (FLP's) car dyno'd 410/390 and runs 122 traps on a warm day 77` at about 700' above sea level.
I agree. If a person is going to look at dyno numbers, they must be obtained by a knowledgeable, and reputable, individual and must be SAE corrected and smoothed. I suspect that many numbers stated on the forum, in various threads, are "estimated" rwhp numbers, or are just the result of spikes. Those are misleading BS and mean nothing at all. It's very easy to manipulate dyno numbers. Integrity is the name of the game and where the rubber meets the road is the proof in the pudding.
Ed
Somethin else worth noting. If your fuel pressure drops below 55lbs the computer starts changing things and your tune will deteriorate over time. As long as your FP stays over 55lbs at all times the ECM doesn't suspect anything.
All his other posts concern a 1995 LT1. One has to wonder about the integrity of his purpose in initiating this thread. Rippie Motorsports is a stand-up Corvette tuner who has also replied to this thread with an offer to help rectify the problem. Still no reply.....
Ed
All his other posts concern a 1995 LT1. One has to wonder about the integrity of his purpose in initiating this thread. Rippie Motorsports is a stand-up Corvette tuner who has also replied to this thread with an offer to help rectify the problem. Still no reply.....
Ed
I agree. Reputable shops will look after the customer. DRM has posted they're willing to look after him so it would only be fair for him to reply. As far as some of the numbers that get posted on the forum go, I'd have to say that I have my doubts about their validity as well. No real world track numbers. You don't race dynos.
Hmmmm.... So I am being doubted? I can upload my dyno sheets this week and pics of my cars. Yes most of my other threads are about a 95 that I am in the process of buliding now. I also have a 69 Tri Power, is it ok if I post about it also? Why would I try to down Doug Rippie? They have offered to help with my problem and they are a very good company. But the answer to my 400 horse woes came from Randy at Doug Rippie. He said they didnt put very big cams in back in 2001 and I would need a bigger cam to put down the 400 horse numbers. Now I am looking at putting another 1,000 dollars in this car for a bigger cam. Surely there is some other way than this. I am thinking about nitrous but don't really like that idea.
I can't exactly remember my 1/4 mile speeds. I do remember the time though, it ran a 13.080. Somewhere around 115. My 60' times is what hurt me at 2.5. I was running the run flats.
Now in closing, I am not trying to say anything bad about DRM. But for a car that is supposed to be the same power of a Viper, well it's not. I have a 99 Viper all stock and it would crush the DRM car.
Oh and c5xstacy, the dyno was SAE smoothed.And a very reputable company.
A 115mph trap speed would mean you have around 365 to 370rwhp. With a small cam that's about where you will be. You didn't mention which heads you're using in your post or the size of the cam. Which intake are you using, LS1 or LS6? There's around 12-15hp difference. Using a cold air intake system will get you better results as well. It may not show up as a big increase on the dyno but at the track it's a whole different story. I don't understand the comment about DRM using a smaller cam in 2001. Did you have the work done that long ago or did you buy the car that way? In any case, let them take a closer look at your car. I'm very curious to see if they find anything wrong. Keep us posted.
I bought the car new in 98. In October of 2001 I had DRM do my work. Last week they called me and spoke to me about my low power issue. They said that in 2001 they had used smaller cams because the whole industry was. Now everyone is running larger cams and pulling more horse from the LS1. So I'm kind of in a sticky situation. I live in KY and can't exactly drive my car to see them. I am thinking of shipping the car to them, but really don't want to put any more money into it than I have already.
Oh and c5xstacy, the dyno was SAE smoothed.And a very reputable company.
The SAE and smoothed dyno comment was not directed at you. I was agreeing with Aquaman about another post in this thread. Why would I question your dyno as being too high? You were saying you thought it was too low. Anyway, peace to you. Glad Randy was able to answer your questions.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.