When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
what is better, built NA motor or turbo, supercharger.......? I'm wondering what's the best bang for your buck and enginge longevity?
not thinking of nitrous.
Last edited by yellow02c5convert; Jun 5, 2009 at 08:21 AM.
A forged engine (stroker preferred) with a good nitrous set up is by far the best bang for the buck.That way you have a strong NA setup and the additional HP/TQ of a power adder when needed.
Last edited by 98vettedave; Jun 5, 2009 at 09:03 AM.
Which is the best NA, Supercharger, Turbo? Answer=YES!
IMO which is all you're gonna get it and maybe some small facts. Supercharged stock car puts great power and tuned well can last a long time IMO. NA can spend a little less money but give up driveability to have the same #'s. Turbos make the engine bay a mess, harder to tune, and have more problems IMO!
The supercharger will provide the quickest ET per $ spent.
Only in your dreams!!If you disregard my motor combo,I only have $1400 dollars in the direct port kit.So if I was running a stock LS1 you could provide me with a FI set up for less money.It takes a lot of boost to make that FI car competitive with a nitrous car.
The supercharger will provide the quickest ET per $ spent.
Originally Posted by 98vettedave
Only in your dreams!!If you disregard my motor combo,I only have $1400 dollars in the direct port kit.So if I was running a stock LS1 you could provide me with a FI set up for less money.It takes a lot of boost to make that FI car competitive with a nitrous car.