Greenwood
#41
While the car ran it was the most fun to watch of anything I ever saw. During those first 10 laps he was in a full drift on the banking all the way around to the back straight. He was flat out dirt tracking the car around the banking. Never seen anything like it before or since. Wish I could remember the exact year. Probably around 75-77 era.
Cool memories!
The cars dart randomly left or right under braking, partially due to flexing of the acid dipped frames. The best way to slow them is to get them a bit sideways, and since the rear tires are so much wider, the back stays the back most of the time. I wish I could do it a quarter as well as John Greenwood did it.
Last edited by sundiego; 06-19-2008 at 12:29 AM.
#42
In an ex SCCA A/P or B/P CORVETTE which is what my post refers to contrary to your posts, the end of 1972, anything raced before 1973 I would consider a vintage/historic group 6 Corvette......remember I said SCCA A/P or B/P Corvette NOT an IMSA Corvette and NOT a "P" car.
redvetracr
redvetracr
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provenance
Provenance is the history of the car on the track , in the day, and to this day, and the proveable ownership line.
Any car that has raced has provenance. It would seem you are rejecting any car that is not up to your standards as not having provenance. The Larry Parks car has provenance. It does not have the level necessary to get it in major events now. It has enough provenance to make it a fabulous dream car for a real Corvette guy to own, rebuild and track in some events. It is a historic car. For many groups it is not old enough to be a vintage car.
The British consider a vintage car only from 1919 to 1930. In the '70s in America it usually meant 25 years and older. Now the cutoff line is grey.
Many fans would disagree with extending the prime SCCA A & B period to as late as the 70's. The better racers had long gone to Trans Am.
There were 7 C3s in group 6A, so Steve must have got over his dislike of them.
73-84 Imsa Wide Body's car, for example has provenance. It has been on the track in recent years, and has a trail of ownership, that becomes important to me when the current owner's brother made it his life's passion. It is not a historic car or a vintage car. It is an amazing car guy story when you learn the complete details.
Last edited by sundiego; 06-19-2008 at 12:58 AM.
#43
Race Director
What year is the cutoff for the word provenance?
Different vintage groups have different cutoffs for the groups. Do you feel you should be racing pre '66 cars?
In the early to mid '60s the hot group was SCCA A and B production. There was a splitting of amateur and pro racing, so John Bishop started the Trans-Am series, and the better drivers and teams followed. The spectators then and now wanted to see the Trans Am cars representing late 60's to early 70's. The SCCA was getting a bit difficult with Trans Am so John Bishop left and started IMSA. That was the race series that was followed in the '70s and the spectators want to see. Follow your favorite drivers and teams and you'll find most of them followed that path. General Racing made a special request that I enter my C3 in their salute to IMSA at Lime Rock. They have made it more than welcome.
Vintage racing isn't real racing. It's not wrestling either. If you want real racing go to your local track, dirt or otherwise and you will see real racing. If you want real racing, join them. We are out there running irreplaceable historic vehichles for spectators to see running on a track, instead of museums. We are driving within our limits, and not trying to be heros.
Jamie is an excellent driver. If you put Ali in the ring for a demonstration with a modern boxer do you want to see Ali knocked out? Jamie showed huge respect for the sport and the legendary drivers. He could drive at a pro level, but choses vintage.
Different vintage groups have different cutoffs for the groups. Do you feel you should be racing pre '66 cars?
In the early to mid '60s the hot group was SCCA A and B production. There was a splitting of amateur and pro racing, so John Bishop started the Trans-Am series, and the better drivers and teams followed. The spectators then and now wanted to see the Trans Am cars representing late 60's to early 70's. The SCCA was getting a bit difficult with Trans Am so John Bishop left and started IMSA. That was the race series that was followed in the '70s and the spectators want to see. Follow your favorite drivers and teams and you'll find most of them followed that path. General Racing made a special request that I enter my C3 in their salute to IMSA at Lime Rock. They have made it more than welcome.
Vintage racing isn't real racing. It's not wrestling either. If you want real racing go to your local track, dirt or otherwise and you will see real racing. If you want real racing, join them. We are out there running irreplaceable historic vehichles for spectators to see running on a track, instead of museums. We are driving within our limits, and not trying to be heros.
Jamie is an excellent driver. If you put Ali in the ring for a demonstration with a modern boxer do you want to see Ali knocked out? Jamie showed huge respect for the sport and the legendary drivers. He could drive at a pro level, but choses vintage.
vintage racing is pretty real in the Midwest and east coast, VSCDA, SVRA and HSR is as close as it comes. Monterey is a show for the fans ....did the SCCA combine C-2 Corvettes in the same class as C-3 Corvettes and the AC Cobra?...they certainly did. Did a 60`s Cobra beat Tony Delorenzo (in a C-3) for an SCCA A/P national championship in the very late 60`s or early 70`s? yes it did. Those cars raced against each other back then why not now? I believe if you check you will find that group 6 vintage rules are based on SCCA A/P, B/P and A/S rules not Trans-Am rules. You might also take a look who won the KIC at Road America in 2007, one of those mid 60`s cars you think can`t compete with the C-3, A guy I enjoyed racing with more than once, Bill Murray in a 427 Cobra. Jaime Mazzotta may be a talented guy BUT the respect he showed was for Steve Earle when Earle told them at the drivers meeting who would finish 1st, 2nd and 3rd...thats if they want an invite next year. Search out Dan Gerber and ask him how he lost his invitation to Monterey some years ago, he lives in the valley not too far from the Earles...that would be Dan Gerber who races the "prune mush" AC Cobra..."prune mush" as in Gerber foods "prune mush". Gerber won a race he was not supposed to win and Steve Earle refused his entry the next year...for all I know they still refuse his entry as I haven`t seen Gerber for quite a while. My post refers to a 1979 ex SCCA B/P - GT-1 Corvette NOT an IMSA CAR and NOT a GTP car...if you want to keep harping about provenance and 1979 cars go right ahead but thats all MY post referred to.
redvetracr
#44
Race Director
redvetracr
#45
You don't know your terms. That '79 is historic and has provenance. It is not a major history car.
A friend of mine was driving his non-historic Shelby GT-350 at Monterey. He was split, one passing on either side, by a pair of Shelby Daytonas. He laughed at about how much of US auto racing history he could have wiped out with one bad move. In the more agressive series you won't tend to see the more historic cars. 40,000 people go to Monterey to see the cars, not middle aged hobbyists play hero There are lots of places those drivers can do that. Sir Sterling Moss was banned from Monterey for wrecking many historic cars. I agree with that. Drivers who drive beyond their limits and put the field at risk are not invited back, not because they won. I've seen unknown drivers drive well, safely and win and be congratulated by General Racing. I'd like these big history cars to be around for a few more generations. There are series that feel rubbin' is racin', and that's great. They just won't see the best cars often.
A friend of mine was driving his non-historic Shelby GT-350 at Monterey. He was split, one passing on either side, by a pair of Shelby Daytonas. He laughed at about how much of US auto racing history he could have wiped out with one bad move. In the more agressive series you won't tend to see the more historic cars. 40,000 people go to Monterey to see the cars, not middle aged hobbyists play hero There are lots of places those drivers can do that. Sir Sterling Moss was banned from Monterey for wrecking many historic cars. I agree with that. Drivers who drive beyond their limits and put the field at risk are not invited back, not because they won. I've seen unknown drivers drive well, safely and win and be congratulated by General Racing. I'd like these big history cars to be around for a few more generations. There are series that feel rubbin' is racin', and that's great. They just won't see the best cars often.
#46
Customer car 02 is significant because of the breakthrough technologies done and overseen by John Greenwood. It's downforce bodywork was copied by the German teams and changed the look of production based race cars. It's Riley coil overs were breakthrough as well. The significant relocation of the engine,way back, down and to the right was ground breaking. It "maximized" the rules in ways that changed race cars. John's driving was excellent, but his car building was better. He was no hired gun who showed up on race day and practices. He even designed that seat. There is an extension on the right to support his leg in the endurance races, with a small extra seat belt to strap his leg in place. This was the "mule", test platform car, and his words, his fastest. It set the speed record at Daytona at the time at 236 MPH. In spite of the Chassis number 02, it was the first customer car. The Spirit of Sebring '76 car was more famous, probably because that was an even better year to have a flag on the hood, but this may be the most historic.
This is not one of those race cars whose value is just because someone famous drove it a few times.
Instead of complaining and moaning how unfair Steve Earle is to you and bragging about what a stud you are on the track, why don't you share some interesting history about your car? With the exception of the pros and the great amateurs like Heinricy, the cars are the stars here.
#47
Race Director
I`m not complaining about Steve Earle, I am not traveling to race in CA, I am simply pointing out that at Monterey "the races are sometimes fixed", making Monterey less of a competitive event and more of a spectacle for the paying public, most of which may or may not know the difference. You continue to neglect the fact my post is directed at an ex SCCA B/P car built in 1979 NOT an IMSA car and NOT a "P" car, (therefore I will not be responding to you in this thread again but PLEASE let me know if and when you beat another guy I know and have raced with in the past, Rob Walton, a guy who IS there to win), that `79 Corvette is a car that you basically can`t race anywhere with the exception of SVRA gr-10 where it would be racing against all the cars with wings and slicks, the SVRA also no longer requires any previous race history making the subject of provenance a moot point. The "bragging" as you put it is being done by the guy who paid Lance (another guy I know well) upwards of "half a mil" for a Greenwood Corvette and has found a way to inject his GTP car into a discussion about Corvette race cars. NOT BY ME!
As to my car it`s the third of three cars built by the Owens-Corning fiberglass team. Mine was built in the winter of 1970 from a recovered theft Delorenzo bought from Don Yenko. When O-C was converting their cars to full roll cages mine got one of the three cages Delorenzo had bent up by ( MI. funny car chassis builder) Logghe stamping, John Thompson`s car and Harry Yeaggy`s cars have long since lost their full roll cages. The car was put on a Pan-Am jet and flown to Europe for Tony`s friend (and then Pan-Am pilot Curt Wetzel) to race in Germany. I have pics and race results from Germany, Wetzel also won the 50th anniversary race at the Berlin track called the AVUS where he set a lap record. After two years in Germany Wetzel returned the car to the US where it was bought by Canadian Porsche dealer Cam Champion (performance motors, St. Catherines ONT), Champion told me he spent $50,000 racing that car in one year, winning a 6hr "sundowner" at Mosport, what he didn`t tell me was that he never paid Wetzel all the money for the car, once I found him Wetzel told me that. It was then sold to Robert Millican (Butler PA) who raced it in SCCA regionals, nationals and an occasional Trans-Am, he sold it to his friend William Steiss who raced it and sold it to Larry Gross who raced a few nationals and went to the CSPRRC in 1978 (Champion spark plug road race classic...maybe the Runoffs?), Gross primarily raced the Trans-Am series competing at BIR, Elkhart and Trois Rivieres, he also raced the bigger spectator nationals, he then sold the car to Keith Berg who rebodied it as a 78 with a Greenwood style nose, Keith raced regionals, nationals and the occasional Trans-Am at Elkhart and Brainerd. He sold the car to Mitch Poremba who raced regionals and nationals, I bought it from Mitch in `94 and got a log book that started in `74 so I had no clue the car had been raced previous until in 98 at the BRIC (it might have still been the Chicago Historics) a friend of Poremba`s asked if I knew the history....I said there is NO HISTORY, he said YOU CHECK IT OUT, as if he knew something I didn`t know, after doing some research the trail led from #2 in the log book "Steiss", to his best friend #1 in the book "Millican" who told me the story about Europe is BS, but he bought the car from "Cam Champion" the Porsche dealer who told me he bought the car from the German Curt Wetzel and that Tony Delorenzo built it for him...now at that 98 Elkhart race I went and introduced myself to Delorenzo who wasn`t happy with the way my car was painted (we honestly did it as a tribute to what O-C accomplished) and now I have to call Tony and ask about Wetzel...Tony kind of chuckled and told me Wetzel lived in Berlin Germany but what he didn`t know is that my mother in law was born in Munich and still has relatives there so with one phone call I had Wetzel`s address and telephone number. I called Wetzel who sent me some pics and told me the history, my wife has a cousin in Germany who has a friend at the ADAC (like our SCCA) they sent me race results, through the race car mooch and writer of "the Last open road" books Burt "BS" Levy I got to a guy in IN who used to write for Autoweek in Europe, one mention of a Corvette in Germany and he knew Wetzel, he sent a couple of articles one that talks about a young mechanic Bruce Stewart who went from working for the Owens-Corning team to being Wetzel`s mechanic in Germany (Bruce Stewart is a reverend in FL now), the articles also tell how in Germany they play the national anthem of the winner and Wetzel`s stewardess girl friend would always have to run and tell them that Wetzel is an American and they would have to start all over playing the USA national anthem, the article also says in Germany the car was known as the psychedelic Corvette because of it`s blue white & purple paint (applied by GM styling engineer and Tony`s friend Randy Wittene, now a senior styling engineer at GM), a few years ago at Elkhart I brought my collection of paperwork and as Delorenzo sat and stared at the one color pic of the car I had at that time he quietly said "thats the best paint job we ever did"...Within a couple of years of GM dropping the big block in the Corvette the SCCA dropped A/P and everyone racing SCCA ran a small block, I had a 355" from my SCCA days and reused that, it became clear everyone was stretching the rules and to compete so did I, that was when I started going fast and winning, winning a total of six group 6 races overall. Then in `03 or `04 it became clear I had to step up again so first the little clutch, then the T-101 trans and finally the 635hp 414" motor, I never went so fast and while I raced that motor only twice I got one 1st and a 2nd place, I also went a blindingly fast, 2:25.0 at Elkhart lake.....knowing then what I know now I would have had an all aluminum 427" bb built and I would have still been racing but after the BRIC crash of `05 some of the same people who were at least partially responsible for the crash decided the crash was the fault of all the over prepared cars, they decided my car needed a big weight penalty with that 414" sb and I have since parked the car after racing once in 2005 and once in 2006.
redvetracr
my car as originally raced in Germany 1971-1972
Last edited by redvetracr; 06-19-2008 at 10:51 AM.
#49
Heel & Toe
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sundiego, look forward to seeing your car in action again at Monterey this year. Also looking forward to seeing a GTP car out there. Should be fun. You took a pic of me sitting in your car at last years historics, thanks!
#50
Race Director
redvetracr
PS: I am also NOT the one that screwed Dick Guldstrand and tried to screw Bill Behling.....now how do you suppose Behling got your mothers phone number so he could call her on mothers day?...
Last edited by redvetracr; 06-26-2008 at 06:08 PM.
#51
Burning Brakes
RedVetRacer - quit wasting your breath on these "wanabe" so-called "racers".
Where do I get the "nerve" to say the above - here's a pic of ME driving MY '69 roadster in the Elkhart trans-am in 1976 (YES, Greedwood was there, along with Tony D., Jerry Hansen, Peter Greg, etc etc etc) -
#52
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Gig Harbor WA
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kinda late to add,, but we aren't talking about a 1983 Corvette
#53
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Gig Harbor WA
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I haven't been a an Earle event at Laguna since I moved out of the county in Feb 2005, but at the Chevolet Marque year, (2003?) event there were a number of C3s of various provenance racing and on display, including a few currently belonging to people in this thread.
#54
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Gig Harbor WA
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vintage racing isn't real racing. It's not wrestling either. If you want real racing go to your local track, dirt or otherwise and you will see real racing. If you want real racing, join them. We are out there running irreplaceable historic vehichles for spectators to see running on a track, instead of museums. We are driving within our limits, and not trying to be heros.
Jamie is an excellent driver. If you put Ali in the ring for a demonstration with a modern boxer do you want to see Ali knocked out? Jamie showed huge respect for the sport and the legendary drivers. He could drive at a pro level, but choses vintage.
Jamie is an excellent driver. If you put Ali in the ring for a demonstration with a modern boxer do you want to see Ali knocked out? Jamie showed huge respect for the sport and the legendary drivers. He could drive at a pro level, but choses vintage.
I agree with this post completely but I have seen Redman etc turn up the heat pretty warm at the Historics and some pretty pricey crashes too.
#55
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Gig Harbor WA
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provenance
Provenance is the history of the car on the track , in the day, and to this day, and the proveable ownership line.
Any car that has raced has provenance. It would seem you are rejecting any car that is not up to your standards as not having provenance. The Larry Parks car has provenance. It does not have the level necessary to get it in major events now. It has enough provenance to make it a fabulous dream car for a real Corvette guy to own, rebuild and track in some events. It is a historic car. For many groups it is not old enough to be a vintage car.
The British consider a vintage car only from 1919 to 1930. In the '70s in America it usually meant 25 years and older. Now the cutoff line is grey.
Many fans would disagree with extending the prime SCCA A & B period to as late as the 70's. The better racers had long gone to Trans Am.
There were 7 C3s in group 6A, so Steve must have got over his dislike of them.
73-84 Imsa Wide Body's car, for example has provenance. It has been on the track in recent years, and has a trail of ownership, that becomes important to me when the current owner's brother made it his life's passion. It is not a historic car or a vintage car. It is an amazing car guy story when you learn the complete details.
Provenance is the history of the car on the track , in the day, and to this day, and the proveable ownership line.
Any car that has raced has provenance. It would seem you are rejecting any car that is not up to your standards as not having provenance. The Larry Parks car has provenance. It does not have the level necessary to get it in major events now. It has enough provenance to make it a fabulous dream car for a real Corvette guy to own, rebuild and track in some events. It is a historic car. For many groups it is not old enough to be a vintage car.
The British consider a vintage car only from 1919 to 1930. In the '70s in America it usually meant 25 years and older. Now the cutoff line is grey.
Many fans would disagree with extending the prime SCCA A & B period to as late as the 70's. The better racers had long gone to Trans Am.
There were 7 C3s in group 6A, so Steve must have got over his dislike of them.
73-84 Imsa Wide Body's car, for example has provenance. It has been on the track in recent years, and has a trail of ownership, that becomes important to me when the current owner's brother made it his life's passion. It is not a historic car or a vintage car. It is an amazing car guy story when you learn the complete details.
On the other hand the widebody cars didn't exist before about 1974/5 but whoever would say a true 75 or 76 Greenwood wide body Lemans car isn't good enough for Any Vintage event is smoking a bunch of Crack.
#56
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Gig Harbor WA
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NOT TRUE, thats not what I said, I would reject THIS car because if you can`t RACE the car then the provenance has no meaning, no value. doing track days and HPDE is NOT racing. Your provenance has meaning and obviously value because John Greenwoods *** sat in the seat.
redvetracr
redvetracr
The cool thing about the Parks car is it's not super valuable or super expensive yet, If I bought it I'd probably race it in current SCCA GT1, because that's real racing.
Personally, I think all you Vintage "racers" are Pussies =P
Last edited by DREGSZ; 06-26-2008 at 09:48 PM.
#57
Racer
EG,
Did not know you where into this stuff Jamie Redman invited me to the last Brian Redman event in Palm Beach at moroso, if you want to be here this year let me know.
You need a scarf, a pipe and a leather helmet. O and a car that is at least 25 years old and driven by someone named sterling,hass,newman, mcqween,polak,stewart,moss, or maybe petty with a rebel flag on the roof.
Did not know you where into this stuff Jamie Redman invited me to the last Brian Redman event in Palm Beach at moroso, if you want to be here this year let me know.
You need a scarf, a pipe and a leather helmet. O and a car that is at least 25 years old and driven by someone named sterling,hass,newman, mcqween,polak,stewart,moss, or maybe petty with a rebel flag on the roof.
#59
Race Director
C-3 Corvettes in 2003 might have had something to do with the feature marque being the 50th anniversary of Corvettes
#60
Race Director
racing Parks car in GT-1 is like taking a knife to a gun fight, it`s a dinosaur that would have to race against tube frame ex Trans-Am style cars, if you enjoy running at the back of the pack then by all means BUY IT.