Is this L88 real? Anyone know?
#41
Team Owner
Let's open pandoras box. What are the 1967 L88 Vin numbers?
This seems to be a secret that only a few may possess. I have for years wrote them down when I have seen one of these claimed cars. I have a little list going. Everyone seems to always refer to some secret cheat sheet to cross reference. What are the VIN's. I know the King of Jordan got a white car and wrecked it. I heard that that car was ordered at the same time with another so two of these have consecutive vin numbers? I won't be one of the people to phony one up, I would just like to know. I do have a list that breaks down the rear end ratios for all 20 cars. I would like to know coupe or convertible and color combination. It would be really interesting. After as many years of people hoping that they find a missing car, I would bet what exists has been found. You either by now have one or you don't. Why the secret society!!!!!! Of experts. Big deal. I hear there are now 36 known 1967 L88 cars. **** some people off and share these numbers for people that would be interested, enthusiasts, thank you!
#42
Drifting
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Forest Lake MN
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Check the sellers feedback....
NEGATIVE - F.Sold car, No Posession, No Pink, No Car. After we won Sold car to someone else
Buyer hockit2me ( 201) Oct-10-05 18:12 4570779580
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=4570779580
NEGATIVE - F.Sold car, No Posession, No Pink, No Car. After we won Sold car to someone else
Buyer hockit2me ( 201) Oct-10-05 18:12 4570779580
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=4570779580
#43
Melting Slicks
Originally Posted by batmann
Check the sellers feedback....
NEGATIVE - F.Sold car, No Posession, No Pink, No Car. After we won Sold car to someone else
Buyer hockit2me ( 201) Oct-10-05 18:12 4570779580
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=4570779580
NEGATIVE - F.Sold car, No Posession, No Pink, No Car. After we won Sold car to someone else
Buyer hockit2me ( 201) Oct-10-05 18:12 4570779580
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=4570779580
#45
Originally Posted by MosportGreen66
This came directly from the NCRS Forum. Thought this was very interesting.
"I also had a long talk with the owner of this car. He stated that it is NOT the original frame under the car that the old frame was totaled and he restamped an NOS frame. When I asked if he still had the old frame to verify the VIN he stated that he did not. He also stated that he put an entire front clip on this car. He has No paper work on the car - just wanted me to take his word on it. He also stated that it was a COPO car from Florida and sold in 68 to the 2nd owner who totaled it and pulled the engine for his boat. To many holes in his story for me. "
"I also had a long talk with the owner of this car. He stated that it is NOT the original frame under the car that the old frame was totaled and he restamped an NOS frame. When I asked if he still had the old frame to verify the VIN he stated that he did not. He also stated that he put an entire front clip on this car. He has No paper work on the car - just wanted me to take his word on it. He also stated that it was a COPO car from Florida and sold in 68 to the 2nd owner who totaled it and pulled the engine for his boat. To many holes in his story for me. "
again, don't get me wrong, it is an absolutely beautifull car, and probably worth $100K cause of the craftsmanship and neat extras like the big tank and L88 motor, BUT definately not a million dollar car. There is absolutely some serious shenanigans going on with the bidding.
that's all I got to say about that.
#46
Melting Slicks
Originally Posted by Birdball
That is red flag #285 for this car... They didn't even have COPO cars in 1967 did they? I don't think that started until 1968 or 1969. That statement alone throw a big into the story for me.
again, don't get me wrong, it is an absolutely beautifull car, and probably worth $100K cause of the craftsmanship and neat extras like the big tank and L88 motor, BUT definately not a million dollar car. There is absolutely some serious shenanigans going on with the bidding.
that's all I got to say about that.
again, don't get me wrong, it is an absolutely beautifull car, and probably worth $100K cause of the craftsmanship and neat extras like the big tank and L88 motor, BUT definately not a million dollar car. There is absolutely some serious shenanigans going on with the bidding.
that's all I got to say about that.
#47
That is very suspicious. Look at the way the seller writes. The way he wrote "67 TANKER / 1of 1 L-88 427/560hp 36gal / HERE IT IS ! !" looks like he is unsure if normal script will have the desired effect with potential bidders. If there is a '67 L88 tanker, we would know, wouldnt we? Bold script wouldnt be neccessary.
And look at the Questions at the bottom of the page. He answers the payment question in all caps, and I am sure he copied the answer for the is-it-a-real-L88 question from the homepage of whoever those people are. That he didnt even consult the NCRS really seals the deal for me. I wouldnt touch that car if it were me. I have that feeling that its a fake, and a pretty good one at that.
And look at the Questions at the bottom of the page. He answers the payment question in all caps, and I am sure he copied the answer for the is-it-a-real-L88 question from the homepage of whoever those people are. That he didnt even consult the NCRS really seals the deal for me. I wouldnt touch that car if it were me. I have that feeling that its a fake, and a pretty good one at that.
#48
Team Owner
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,156
Received 7,015 Likes
on
4,819 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist
Originally Posted by Birdball
. They didn't even have COPO cars in 1967 did they? I don't think that started until 1968 or 1969.
#49
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: Cascade Maryland
Posts: 2,216
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
6 Posts
Originally Posted by batmann
Check the sellers feedback....
NEGATIVE - F.Sold car, No Posession, No Pink, No Car. After we won Sold car to someone else
Buyer hockit2me ( 201) Oct-10-05 18:12 4570779580
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=4570779580
NEGATIVE - F.Sold car, No Posession, No Pink, No Car. After we won Sold car to someone else
Buyer hockit2me ( 201) Oct-10-05 18:12 4570779580
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=4570779580
http://ebay.carad.com/viewItem/viewU...9736874&type=1
#50
Melting Slicks
Originally Posted by FXT
Not that I care either way, but if you read the "fine print".... i.e. the "Terms of Sale" at the bottom of the '58 auction, it says "subject to prior sale by owner or dealer".
http://ebay.carad.com/viewItem/viewU...9736874&type=1
http://ebay.carad.com/viewItem/viewU...9736874&type=1
#51
Melting Slicks
Originally Posted by 65air_coupe
You can put what you want in fine print, an auction that closes with a winning bidder represents a legal commitment for both buyer and seller.
#52
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Mission Viejo California
Posts: 2,257
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by 65air_coupe
You can put what you want in fine print, an auction that closes with a winning bidder represents a legal commitment for both buyer and seller.
Is there truly a legal binding contract, signed and witnessed, from EBAY auctions?
Has there been a case where litigation proved the legal commitment?
And if it did, would any judgement be for more than the EBAY costs of running the "auction" ?
#53
Melting Slicks
You're asking questions I can't answer, but I can tell you that not fulfilling the terms of the auction is seriously frowned upon and I'm surprised this person is allowed to submit other items for auction.
#54
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Fort Wayne IN
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06
Check out the bid retractions at the bottom. A bidder entered the wrong amount at $1,000,000.
http://offer.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/...tem=4581027348
http://offer.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/...tem=4581027348
Last edited by jntdysf; 10-13-2005 at 09:21 PM.
#55
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: Cascade Maryland
Posts: 2,216
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
6 Posts
Originally Posted by Seaside63
In reality, it's only a Moral commitment.
Is there truly a legal binding contract, signed and witnessed, from EBAY auctions?
Has there been a case where litigation proved the legal commitment?
And if it did, would any judgement be for more than the EBAY costs of running the "auction" ?
Is there truly a legal binding contract, signed and witnessed, from EBAY auctions?
Has there been a case where litigation proved the legal commitment?
And if it did, would any judgement be for more than the EBAY costs of running the "auction" ?
In any event, I don't think eBay will take any action against the seller. The winning bidders only recourse is to sue the seller, but I don't think that will happen. Just my 2 cents.
#57
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,859 Likes
on
1,102 Posts
Originally Posted by bb62
What I don't understand is why this guy selling the car shouldn't be prosecuted for fraud. It's obvious he's trying to rip someone off with a built car.
#58
Originally Posted by JohnZ
There are HUNDREDS of fake/clone/built-up/fraudulent and mis-represented cars listed every single day on eBay, and lots of people who don't do their homework get taken every day buying them; "buyer beware" is always the order of the day. It's a jungle out there
#59
Melting Slicks
Originally Posted by bb62
JohnZ, While its true that the buyer needs to take a "buyer beware" attitude in his search. I remember in my search for the 67 L71 that I currently have (and have had for about 10 years now) that documentation and contact with all the prior owners was a MUST before I bought. But, with these cars approaching the realm of rare art, there are significant legal penalties in the art world for misrepresenting the work of artists - and people go to jail if convicted as forgers. I think that what this guy is doing is a crime - a real honest to goodness lock 'em up behind bars crime - because if he gets his way - someone gets hurt.
#60
Melting Slicks
Originally Posted by bb62
JohnZ, While its true that the buyer needs to take a "buyer beware" attitude in his search. I remember in my search for the 67 L71 that I currently have (and have had for about 10 years now) that documentation and contact with all the prior owners was a MUST before I bought. But, with these cars approaching the realm of rare art, there are significant legal penalties in the art world for misrepresenting the work of artists - and people go to jail if convicted as forgers. I think that what this guy is doing is a crime - a real honest to goodness lock 'em up behind bars crime - because if he gets his way - someone gets hurt.
The difference in the art world is that if you do not have documentation you have a fake. It is really hard to campare cars to art or at least really Expensive art. Cars were mass produced to be used daily. There were enough spare parts to make a few clones, as can be seen daily on ebay. Weather it is a Shelby, a L88 or a Yenko Camaro. Expensive art are usually one offs, making originals really difficult to copy.
oWEN