4 speed vs Automatic
rustylugnuts

Last edited by rustylugnuts; Jun 19, 2010 at 10:36 AM.

http://100megsfree4.com/corvette/1960/vet69.htm
"Historical notes" on automatic transmission option times...
Wow! My little 67 327 with a off road Z-28 Crane Cam SSH-310NC ran a 12.01 @108.6 mph..... I could be standing outside my Corvette at the traps eating a hot dog and drinking a coke before that BB auto comes crawling by...... Peace
rustylugnuts
We rent the track several times a year and will do as much as 9-10 runs that day. We also do some public events that have brackets. Our series is heads up only.
I think the auto's came in to favor back in the late 60s and 70s was because the tire technology was way behind the engines of the day. There was no way to hook up a stick to launch as fast as an auto car, too much tire spin.
With today's bracket racing, ET does not matter. With all the electronics, racing has been reduced to a large version of a video game, little driver skill needed. What a shame.





I'm a performance driver (and ocassional crusing driver) and I want the maximum control possible from a car. You GET that control with a 4sp (or a 5sp or a 6sp), you do not get that total control with an auto tranny. People, including myself, WILL PAY the extra $$$$ for a 4sp car over an identical auto tranny car. Some, not all, auto trannys WILL SHIFT, NO MATTER WHERE THE GEAR SELECTOR IS POSITIONED, and NOT where you want it. And last, the enjoyment of driving a 4sp car (I use 4sp as generic for 3sp, 4sp, 5sp, 6sp) is lost with an auto tranny car.
And, then there are those folks who state that an auto tranny shifts faster than a 4sp. BS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Take a ride with Tom Parsons, and I'll show you how fast a properly adjusted 4sp can be shifted! Keep in mind that I grew up in the days of the power shifted muscle car era. Sometimes it just makes me want to puke when I see how some people shift their 4sp cars.
ABSOLUTELY, I'll pay more for a 4sp car, plus, a Vette with an auto tranny is just as wrong as 2 boys having sex!
Tom Parsons
You must abstain from "sugar coating" all your responses.....
"

use this link and take a look, I have both the Hemi and LS7 with automatics...because 'Winning isn`t everything, its the only thing'
http://www.competitionplus.com/2005_02_03/holton.html
good reading, no offense either
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Bodies that have had severe damage are not easily repaired without lingering problems and appearance issues.

A new vette would have to be a convertible with automatic... no other choice would be considered.
Mike
Chose 'em both and love 'em both for different reasons.
I know it is just my own personal thing, but to me the C2 is a car I want to drive like a performance car, mash the gas, and row the gears. I would not have considered an auto tranny when I shopped my 63.
However, on a nice day, I like to drop the top for a leisurely cruise in the C3 roadster without having to bother with shifting. I can drink a cup of coffee, fiddle with the radio, put my elbow up on the door and enjoy it. Not to say the car doesn't get on it when I want it to. But it offers some things the 63 doesn't and vice versa.
I think there are buyers for both.
of the 7 Corvettes, 2 Z-28's, 2- 66 big block(360 & 375) SS Chevelles, 2- El Camino's, 2- SS 396/375 SS Novas, 63 421 Catalina, 64 GTO, 66 2+2 421 Pontaic convertible that i currently own, the only automatics in my collection are my 66 impala (BIG block/full option) turbo 400 w/ a Gear Vendors overdrive and a 38 chevy business coupe street rod. i wish those 2 were sticks, but they're too nice to change. the ONLY muscle car with an automatic is the Hurst Olds.
i know that an automatic shifts faster, but this is the street, not the U.S. Nationals at Raceway park in Indianapolis. i'll trade a 1/10th or 2 for the buzz of powershifting my "MUSCLE" cars.... just my humble opinion...
DON'T BE A *****.....











oh yeah





