When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I was wondering how many of you would have a removable cross-member installed in your new C2 frame?
Here is the scenario. . .
You bought a pretty nice C2 but the frame is in terrible condition. Lots of rust and bubbling and in many places you can poke your finger through the frame. You have had a frame expert look at your frame and it will cost more to weld patches and replace sections than to buy a new frame. You pulled the trigger and ordered a new frame built from a company in Michigan. You are not a big NCRS guy and not planning on having the car judged but would like it looking good and easy to work on upon completion. The frame company told you that it would cost $75 for them to install a removable cross-member (for ease of transmission removal) prior to delivery.
So here is the poll.
How many of you would opt to have a removable cross-member installed in your brand new C2 frame and how many would not? Thanks for participating. C.J.
Absolutely, I would have a removable crossmember. I put one in when installing a 700R4, made the job easy. I may be wrong, but I don't think there is any aftermarket trans you could install without pulling the motor if you don't have a removable crossmember.
Any correction of GM design failure is an improvement in my opinion. Although I am not an automotive engineer, I cannot see any lose structurally if it is added properly..
No, I would not opt for the removable cross member. My C2 is bone stock and having the fixed cross member in place makes it trivial to install the engine and trans as a unit. Trivial, I say. Set the engine down on its mounts and the transmission down on the crossmember, then take your time installing bolts because the assembly isn't going anywhere.
Only if I were going to change to a non original trans in the car. At that point you have lost your originality anyway. No reason to otherwise as I have never had a problem removing an original type trans.
You Described my exact car purchase. I have the new frame and it is an automatic frame so it has a removable crossmember. I am thinking of modifying this one to make the center piece removable. Changing a clutch will be so much easier. The dang exhaust in those holes just gets in the way.
i installed one in my 67 using flanges when i did a TH350 swap. if i'd had the frame off i would have gone with the later auto trans style, much cleaner.
I chose not to cut up my 67 frame just in case I want to go NCRS route in the future. Everything will be original with the exception of the drive train. The folks at Silver Sport swear with their new smaller TKX that it "isn't that bad" changing out a clutch without pulling the engine & trans.
Just a thought. Does cutting the crossmember make the frame more prone to twisting in high horsepower applications? Having an actual welded piece in place between the rails would seem better than bolts.
Absolutely, I would have a removable crossmember. I put one in when installing a 700R4, made the job easy. I may be wrong, but I don't think there is any aftermarket trans you could install without pulling the motor if you don't have a removable crossmember.
Well, it can be done - my TKO 500 went in without pulling the engine and over the factory cross member. I would not do that again! Definitely would go to a removable cross member if the circumstances come up.
If the car is a numbers matching car, presumably with a new (but stamped) frame, my question is this: Is the re-sale value of the car affected because the cross member is now removable? I would want to know that first. Even if the car passes on to heirs, at some point someone is selling it. I would want to weigh that against the likelihood that you really ever need to remove the cross member to work on/repair anything. Removable cross member might also bring attention to the fact that the frame is not original.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.