RIPPED-OFF...what do I do???
Oh really?
vettebay: "He called me directly and said he was throwing together a cheap driver and asked if I would give him a deal on a bunch of used interior parts which I also needed to dye for him as well."
Dep
I just don't understand why some simple facts aren't getting across to you...
The above quote from vettebay is COMPLETELY INACCURATE... I NEVER called him directly (do I need to get a "call history" from my phone company to prove this?) Again, would I put the time and effort into rebuilding a '95 LT1/4L60e into a '76 if I just wanted a "cheap driver"? (believe me, it wasn't a weekend project by any means!) I asked for items of same color (red or black were my choices) so when "I" dyed them, they would match. SELLER said that dying them himself was included in the price. I never said that HE NEEDED to dye them for me.
Then there's the $$$ issue that you keep bringing up... I asked for items that were not rotted or had unraveling vinyl. This was SPECIFICALLY stated in my E-MAIL (not phone call!) when I requested the items. I received items that ARE rotted AND have unraveling vinyl! SELLER determined the price knowing WELL AWARE of my requirements. $300 (actually $325), $1,200, whatever...the price means nothing to this issue. I received parts that the SELLER knew UP-FRONT that I did NOT want. I'm not willing to pay $1 for something I don't want. It doesn't matter if it has a value of $50 or $500...if I don't want it, I'm not going to buy it. Why should SELLER get away with selling me parts he knows I didn't want?
I don't think that this is a RISK that we are putting ourselves up against when purchasing items online, in an auction or at Best Buy. You wouldn't accept a 2-head Toshiba VCR when you asked for a SONY DVD player...it doesn't matter how much the VCR is, you didn't ask for it, it doesn't matter.
Another thing DR'76 made his complaint known here on the forum to see what the rest of the forum members thought after he nicely tried to have VetteBay take the merchandise back but failed. He wanted to know what we felt about the situation. Based on what I read I would say close to 90% of the readers here agree with DR'76. VetteBay wanted to take a pole, just read the posts and that will tell you something.
As far as the price goes. You are right maybe $300 isn't alot of money to you or me but to some people it is. Again DR'76 didn't set the price, VetteBay did. DR'76 told VetteBay from what we read what type of parts he was looking for and what he would settle for. Looking at pictures of these parts they are nothing that I would want or settle for. Based on the pictures I saw of DR'76's Corvette's engine compartment it is hard for me to believe DR'76 would offer to purchase parts that looked like what was sent to him. I would think he would rather spend the extra $900 for new stuff instead. I know I would if given the choice. Look at that dash pad with all the rust under it. To me it is unbelieveable that something like that was sent out to DR'76 don't you think so? Most of us members do.
Looks like you goofed on your research. Look at post #11 on this thread:"Well, I guess I should have stated that I haven't contacted him yet"
11 posts and he still hadn't contacted the seller. He came here FIRST to pitch his gripe and get the members aligned on his side. Lets leave off the sugar coating. I'm on a diet

"Another thing DR'76 made his complaint known here on the forum to see what the rest of the forum members thought after he nicely tried to have VetteBay take the merchandise back but failed."
Again...he posted HERE first and THEN went to the seller with his gripe.
Nicely tried????? Please remove the rose-tinted glasses. Here's a quote from the same post #11 BEFORE he contacted the seller:
"I want to keep it professional (even though he obviousely isn't a "professional" or even "moral" person), but want to let him know that I will fight this to the end."
Accusations of being unprofessional and immoral. Guess DR'76 never heard the motto "you catch more bees with honey than vinegar".
Note that bobs77vet all the way down on post #20 comments:
"just as a comment..... you bashed the guy pretty good and told us who he was before giving him the opportunity to fix it....i would have given him the opportunity to fix it before i aired my grievance publically...."
So it's not just me that sees this. And I agree 100% with what Bob said.
Note also on post #24. AGVI also agrees with what Bob said.
Finally at post #31, THE NEXT DAY, we hear of actual contact being made with the seller.
I read the posts. Am I suppposed to be surprised that he convinced some of the forum members after all those negative posts to his way of thinking? I'm NOT. And you will note that the ones that disagreed posted early in the thread. They suggested he contact the seller immediately, but warned him that he had already poisoned the waters with his comments.
I like your twist on what I had stated earlier about why would Dr'76 ONLY spend $300 on the interior after the engine compartment looks like he spent some good change on it. Are you in politics by any chance? You need to get into O'Reilly's NO SPIN ZONE

VetteBay did set the price, which looking at the parts, looks entirely reasonable. But that is subjective on what each person would pay for USED parts. That's the key. What DR'76 is suffering from is nothing but "buyers remorse". He agree to pay the price. If he DIDN'T get a good look at the parts BEFORE buying, that's HIS fault for not asking for better pictures of the parts. Buyer beware...remember????
Would I settle for those parts? Depends on the car I'm installing them in. Would you? Probably not. Would someone else...YES.
Just because DR'76 TOLD the seller what he wanted, doesn't absolve him of MAKING SURE that's what he GOT. If he had any worries, he should have ASKED for more detailed pictures and descriptions. Again...you are only accepting HIS side of the story. YOU have no idea if it's true or not. Only the buyer and seller REALLY know what happened.
You also make it sound like those parts are beyond repair. The rust can be sandblasted off if it's on metal. If it's on vinyl, just wipe it off.
I am doing that EXACT same thing under my dash to the steering column support brackets as well as the pedal brackets. Maybe the repairing of those parts is BEYOND DR'76's abilities. If that is the case, he should have ordered new and bit the bullet for $1200.
A man has to know his limitations

Dep
Last edited by DJ Dep; Jun 10, 2005 at 06:22 PM.
I just don't understand why some simple facts aren't getting across to you...
The above quote from vettebay is COMPLETELY INACCURATE... I NEVER called him directly (do I need to get a "call history" from my phone company to prove this?) Again, would I put the time and effort into rebuilding a '95 LT1/4L60e into a '76 if I just wanted a "cheap driver"? (believe me, it wasn't a weekend project by any means!) I asked for items of same color (red or black were my choices) so when "I" dyed them, they would match. SELLER said that dying them himself was included in the price. I never said that HE NEEDED to dye them for me.
Then there's the $$$ issue that you keep bringing up... I asked for items that were not rotted or had unraveling vinyl. This was SPECIFICALLY stated in my E-MAIL (not phone call!) when I requested the items. I received items that ARE rotted AND have unraveling vinyl! SELLER determined the price knowing WELL AWARE of my requirements. $300 (actually $325), $1,200, whatever...the price means nothing to this issue. I received parts that the SELLER knew UP-FRONT that I did NOT want. I'm not willing to pay $1 for something I don't want. It doesn't matter if it has a value of $50 or $500...if I don't want it, I'm not going to buy it. Why should SELLER get away with selling me parts he knows I didn't want?
I don't think that this is a RISK that we are putting ourselves up against when purchasing items online, in an auction or at Best Buy. You wouldn't accept a 2-head Toshiba VCR when you asked for a SONY DVD player...it doesn't matter how much the VCR is, you didn't ask for it, it doesn't matter.
I would NOT be looking on E-Bay or any other schlock location for used parts.
Buying from Best Buy is VERY different from buying on E-Bay or directly from a seller online.
You can walk in the door and SEE exactly what you are buying.
You can open the box in your car out in front of the place to make sure all the parts are there and nothings damaged. If you go home and it doesn't work, you can take it back for an exchange or refund because THAT IS THEIR POLICY.
Buying from someone who sells on E-Bay, but you buy direct, is even more risky that buying ON E-Bay.
E-Bay is, as others have said, like dealing with the WILD WEST.
I would say even buying directly from a Forum member involves a good deal of risk.
I have been burned on E-Bay. I would bet pretty much everyone has if they've bought more than a few times, although some are so in love with the place it they won't admit it.
I suggest you do as others have suggested and sell the parts on E-bay.Then go to a reputable place like Corvette America or Corvette Central and buy NEW/REPRODUCTION parts for what you need.
Dep
Last edited by DJ Dep; Jun 10, 2005 at 02:17 PM.





o Negotiate with the seller before airing your grievance on a public forum.
o More often than not (probably 60:40), I have been dissapointed when purchasing used parts on ebay. I avoid power sellers like the plague. They usually turn out like the seller in this instance.
o When buying used parts, always ask for lots of pictures. Same is true when buying from a forum member (although, 99% of my forum transactions have been great).
While the buyer made a few mistakes here, I do tend to agree that he should get his money back in this case. The seller doesn't care, as there are plenty of suckers out there. The buyer can't leave feedback and with all he sells, a few negative feedbacks don't effect his business that much anyway. He just made a quick $325 on parts he might have had to throw away, or sold for pennies on ebay.
Fred

Understand, IF the seller agrees to return the money, especially after all this pi**ing and moaning from DR'76, it MAY lead to more business.
I doubt that, since DR'76 made such a big deal about this, NOBODY is gonna be willing to take the risk.
It may also set a very BAD precedent of causing people to think that if the least little thing on a part they buy isn't absolutely the way they want it, they can send it back. I suspect VetteBay is thinking this and that's why there will be NO refund.
There is another problem though. If we keep peeing on guys selling parts, we could easily see guys STOP selling parts because they don't want to put up with the stupidity involved with the transaction. So scarce parts that aren't available from vendors could dry up. And there are PLENTY of essential parts that vendors don't carry.
I also DON'T buy that "customer is always right" crap either. Not in this day and age with all the scams going on. I think each individual transaction has to be considered before any refund is given. If it's store policy that refunds are accepted, as in Best Buy or Target, etc, that's one thing. But we aren't dealing with gigantic conglomerates that have unlimited capital backing them.
flood: For once I agree with you 100%!!!
Dep
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts


Aw heck they ain't eat'n nothin' no way.
If you want new go buy it, I did. But I have a real nice interior for a driver that someone would like to have I'm sure.
Another thing I agree with is if I have a problem I take it up with the other party before I get on the soap box. If I have an issue from a sale I try to take care of it. I sold two articles the other day to a forum member and he wasn't as happy as he thought he should be. We had a misunderstanding about the brand of the parts I sold him. Good parts and one was stamped the brand I told him it was, but they were in Summitt house brand boxes. Still the same parts but he had an issue and I understood. He contacted me first and I agreed that the statement was probably not clear and that the parts were Summitt brand and not that the name brand boxed that was only sold by Summitt. I appreciated him contacting me and allowing me to make things right by sending him another new part he need to balance things out. It cost me some money, but that's how you have to do things especially when you are at fault and I was at fault. jim
Let me tell you a little story that happened years ago when I owned a Carquest Parts store. We had a backyard mechanic that would come in now and then who lived in the small town where my parts store was located. He came in one day and purchased a complete clutch set up. Pressure plate, Disc, throwbearing the works. Six months went by and he comes in to my parts store with these boxes in his hands. At first I thought he was returning cores. He put the boxes down on the front counter. It was the complete clutch set up he purchased 6 months prior. The boxes were in terrible shape and had gotten wet at one time or another. The pressure plate and center of the clutch disc had signs of rust on them. Our policy at the time was to take back any item other then electrical or special order and not used that was in resaleable condition within 30 days. This merchandise was not resaleable and it was 6 months. I did not take it back. Number one I lost a customer. Number two he bad mouthed me all over the small town where we were located and I am sure we lost some business because of it. What would you do if you were in my shoes? To this day I still feel I did the right thing but it is things like this (word of mouth) that will hurt your business.
That was an entirely different situation that I was faced with, then what occured here with DR'76. He told VetteBay exactly what he was looking for and also told him in what shape he expected the interior parts to be in. He told VetteBay what was acceptable and what was not acceptable and VetteBay set the price and DR'76 agreed and paid for the items through PayPal and VetteBay sent him the parts. DR'76 opened the boxes and was not satisified as to what VetteBay sent him. VetteBay has an obligation to either take the parts back and return the money or send interior parts acceptable to DR'76. Its as simple as that.
Dep, I know what you are probably thinking right now. You are probably saying to yourself what does he expect for $300 because you mentioned this before. This is not the case. Vette Bay set the price. I think if he wanted more money DR'76 would of still purchased the parts feeling that he was going to get what he asked for to begin with. This is my honest opinion to this situation here and like I said before VetteBay needs to step up to the plate and do the right thing now in making contact with DR'76 and working this thing out.
The refund will NOT be made. The whole situation is at an impasse.
Any hope for a refund ceased with DR'76 first post badmouthing the seller before even giving the seller a chance to solve the problem or explain the situation. We don't KNOW what the "right thing" even is. We have two conflicting stories and it all depends on which story you believe. Only the government can afford to "throw money at a problem" to make it go away. Note that DR'76 hasn't posted here in a LONG time. Maybe he already sold the parts? Let's just let this thing die out and chalk it up to a learning experience for all.
Dep
It seems the buyer may have been willing to spend more to get the quality of parts he was asking for. He did not set the price. Perhaps he could have questioned the seller about the price with something like "Are you sure all these parts are in good condition for that price?" But that would have given the seller the opportunity to raise the price and may have still sent the same parts. The seller sells a lot of vette parts. He knows what is good, what is bad, and what should be thrown in the dumpster. I think the situation would be much different if a credit card was used as the buyer could file a complaint with his credit card company. It's quite obvious that the buyer would be entitled to a complete refund. I can assure you the credit card companies will side with the buyer in instances like this. I didn't read all the posts but there is another scenario that could still play out. The seller could replace the inferior parts and the buyer pays the difference. With all the negative emotion of this transaction it is doubtful there is any trust between the parties to have another whack at making things work out.
The refund will NOT be made. The whole situation is at an impasse.
Any hope for a refund ceased with DR'76 first post badmouthing the seller before even giving the seller a chance to solve the problem or explain the situation. We don't KNOW what the "right thing" even is. We have two conflicting stories and it all depends on which story you believe. Only the government can afford to "throw money at a problem" to make it go away. Note that DR'76 hasn't posted here in a LONG time. Maybe he already sold the parts? Let's just let this thing die out and chalk it up to a learning experience for all.
Dep
mandm1200
I mentioned the same thing telling DR'76 that he would of been protected if a credit card was used. This was all talked about in earlier posts. You are right if a credit card was used we wouldn't still be talking about this. By now the credit card company would of taken the $300 back out of VetteBays account once DR'76 showed prove of return and VetteBay knows this.
It isn't an issue of opinion in this case...I didn't ask for "good", "fair", "perfect" condition; I asked for NOT ROTTED, NOT TORN (I actually used the term "unraveling vinyl"). There is nothing here to debate on...it's either ROTTED or it's not rotted; it's either TORN or it's not torn (or in my case BOTH apply to some of the items, which are Rotted AND Torn).
This was all stated CLEARLY UP-FRONT...there is no reason for any misunderstanding by the SELLER.
Actually, the seller offered a good compromise....
"In summary - it's just a matter of opinion. I am fair seller - but I don't feel that I should crumble everytime someone demands a refund for a 30 year old part - hence - one percent or so of the people I deal with are not happy. I appreciate the fact that "bad publicity" may hurt my business, but the bottom line is that this is just one unsatisfied customer who wants to drill me into a refund. I currently have more Corvette parts on eBay than anyone else in the world and so long as you buy through eBay, you can expect to be satisfied 99% of the time. If the administrator/ moderator wants to set up a legitimate poll - I'd be happy to give the guy back say 50% of his money if the viewers vote for it - and he can keep the parts.''
And a newsflash....this guy wasn't ever registered on the forum before all the whining started. I doubt his profits will be dented at all if NOBODY on the forum buys from him. I still can't figure out why DR'76
hasn't cranked up a poll. 50% return of his money plus keep the parts (and still sell them on E-Bay). A bird in the hand is better than a TURD in the hand.
Dep
The seller can do no wrong in his eyes, regardless of all the evidence to the contrary. If the seller screws over a buyer... the buyer should've know better. If the seller sends the buyer junk, the buyer should keep his mouth shut and accept it... The seller is always devoid of responsibility.... or so Dep seems to think.
I'd let it go.
The seller can do no wrong in his eyes, regardless of all the evidence to the contrary. If the seller screws over a buyer... the buyer should've know better. If the seller sends the buyer junk, the buyer should keep his mouth shut and accept it... The seller is always devoid of responsibility.... or so Dep seems to think.
I'd let it go.
. I do NOT always side with the seller. Look at post #66 in this thread. I hardly consider that as "siding with the seller". In post #68 the seller made a VERY reasonable offer to help resolve the issue. I see no reason why that offer wasn't accepted. FYI...Caveat Emptor...buyer beware...is a practice EVERYONE should use to the fullest while buying on E-Bay or anywhere else. That type of "junk", as you describe it, would have prevented this BS in the first place. Is this buyer a fool with outlandish expectations?
I'd say YES. Certainly thinking he is going to get 30-year-old parts for dirt cheap that are flawless is NOT something a reasonable person would expect or even ask for. The only "evidence" we have is the few pictures that DR'76 posted. And those don't look all that bad. Certainly not as bad as they are made out to be. I think DR'76 got parts in the EXACT VALUE and resonable condition that he PAID for.
Dep
i will always check for your name when shopping on e-bay and will probably not buy from you .I'm sorry but as an innocent observer watching this thread, you should have given him a full refund upon return of the goods at the buyers expense.
I have been in retail business for many years and know you will get back what you put out. i have bitten the bullet and refunded when i didnt think i should, and sometimes they don't return anyway,but being an honest sales person will always pay back better in the end. if you don't believe me , ask my boss when he's writing out my bonus cheques.
i am finished now and i relinquish control of the soap box to the next speaker.thank you.











