When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Legal contracts are supposed to represent information accurately.
Also, the car does NOT say AS-IS which is one way a dealer tries to get away without disclosing information.
Of course it doesn't say refund... but contracts that are not 'fraudulant means illegal and VOID... same as refund in the Law system.
I will pursue this case.
Here's a tip: If you find an invoice in the car for a paint job that's dated during his ownership, then you have evidence that he's lying.....that's the type of documentation you need to prove fraud....
I wish you luck. A $15,000 '76 better be "Beyond Perfect". I have to agree with others that buying a car like that sight unseen is a pretty big gamble. I see lots of cars on ebay that I would buy if I knew that they were what the seller says they are. Since I can't see them in person, I either bid low, or pass. It sounds like you paid $15k for a $6k vette.
Here's a tip: If you find an invoice in the car for a paint job that's dated during his ownership, then you have evidence that he's lying.....that's the type of documentation you need to prove fraud....
Good luck with it......
Repaint doesn't need an invoice.
A bodyshop can see it.
Hey Classic, seems there bashing you pretty good, I bought a Cadillac Deville last year from Arizona and a VW Cabrio for my Daughter this year from Nj both on E-Bay and both were great deals (I guess
I was luckly) But the thing I looked for was a lot of feedback, The guy you bought from only had feed back for 6 items and only one from the buyer. I know all this is 20/20 and I think you should persue the issue, the next time I buy a large Item I will have the funds held in escrow untill I receive the Item. I learned my lesson with the sidepipes!!!
Oh BTW I live in Pa, I did not see the cadillac, but I did see the VW
prior to purchase. I do agree E-Bay is a way to get sellers and buyers together.
You insult me for being honest and getting all the info I can directly from the seller to make the BEST choice I can without being ABLE to see the car in person due to timeframe and location.
I bet you are an honest guy. No joke, I really think you probably are. But I think you're trying to project that honesty onto someone else who probably doesn't share your ideals. The BEST choice would've been not to bid on a car that you couldn't see for yourself. This is not a $20 video game, this is a $15,000 car. You've got a lot to lose. You gambled, and you lost.
Ebay was created for that.
No, it was not.
The seller can LIE all he wants and is A Okay in your book... so that is why you are obviously a liar yourself.
Where did you get that? Did I say that? Like yourself, I'm a very honest person, but unlike yourself my trust is not given quickly nor easily. My skepticism would've kept me out of this deal. I would be pissed off to be sure if I was in your position, but I would never be in your position.
Like a previous post said, IF you can prove those repairs and a repaint during the prior ownership, then you MIGHT have a case. But from the wording of the ad, you DO NOT.
First and most important - seperate the seller's opinion from simple facts. In the auction he describes the car as a 1 owner car with original paint and 42K miles.
Obviously he lied about the original paint and did not state that body panels have been replaced - that's what counts at court, not his opinion about the condition of the car.
First and most important - seperate the seller's opinion from simple facts. In the auction he describes the car as a 1 owner car with original paint and 42K miles.
Obviously he lied about the original paint and did not state that body panels have been replaced - that's what counts at court, not his opinion about the condition of the car.
by the way, Ebay offers escrow...
But can't "original paint" be taken different ways?
Maybe he(seller) didn't know that the panels have been replaced?
The seller said so himself that it sat in a showroom for 10 years....maybe thats what he (seller) was led to believe it was original paint?
hasn't anyone ever sold or bought a home before?
I'm not taking anyone's side but these are the questions that can come up in court and will be up to the buyer to prove otherwise.
Court systems can suck but thats the way it is sometimes....
But can't "original paint" be taken different ways?
Maybe he(seller) didn't know that the panels have been replaced?
The seller said so himself that it sat in a showroom for 10 years....maybe thats what he (seller) was led to believe it was original paint?
hasn't anyone ever sold or bought a home before?
I'm not taking anyone's side but these are the questions that can come up in court and will be up to the buyer to prove otherwise.
Court systems can suck but thats the way it is sometimes....
Here's what the seller says in his auction:
First, it has been a 1-owner car since I purchased from the dealer. Since new, the dealer owned the car and kept it in their showroom as the dealer prized it. The dealer sold it to me after 10 years in his showroom in 1986. It had 3,000 miles on it when I bought it. I have the original sales receipt, purchase info, and all dealer documentation. It now has 42k. The mileage is original and the exterior completely unrestored (except for touching up the nose with paint ....)....
maybe it was wrecked and repaired while the dealer owned it... still the car is not as advertized if the buyer's description is correct.... I'm also not taking anyone's side - especially since there are no photos posted that show all these flaws...
Bleached paint on the hood for example matches the description "completely unrestored" perfectly...
Good luck with your legal case....it may run another $5000.00 to get it in court...in 8 months or so...
I'd get a notary for your statements and a pro photographer to document that car of yours quick...then have a lawyer just write a letter to the seller about mis-representation and your San Jose "playboy" might get nervous and agree to take it back..I've used lawyers like that in the past...works 90% of the time..cheap too...
Classiczx asked if someone, in the area, could take a look at his vette and see what we thought. I just came back and took a few pics. You can find them in the northeast section here, midway down:
I'm don't know too much about C3s but the two things that really stood out was the condition of the hood and this:
The other side has a crack very similar to this almost in the exact same spot. Is there anything that could cause that? Also, notice in the pic, the orange peel you can see in the flashpoint. Whenever I've seen C3's at corvette shows, they always have great paint, much better than today's C5's and C6's (most likely because of the lack of lead based paint nowadays). Did 76's have lead based paint?? Just curious. I'm almost positive this wasn't factory paint.
I would have taken more pics but it was starting to get dark.