side gill question





I'd cut it out in a heartbeat if it's not a truly rare shark in question, or at least paint it flat black as I did on the L71 I once had. Opening it up would improve aero and underhood cooling...




I'd cut it out in a heartbeat if it's not a truly rare shark in question, or at least paint it flat black as I did on the L71 I once had. Opening it up would improve aero and underhood cooling...It should be flat black unless it's a code 900 Tuxedo Black car, in which case it would be body color.










I've actually looked into putting the '68-69 gills on my SA because (with all 4 open) that design provides so much total outlet area, but after learning how expensive those panels can be I think I'm just going to enlarge the existing vent by pushing the back side of the opening in a couple inches. That would both accomplish my goals and remain more period correct for the body...
Last edited by TheSkunkWorks; Jul 15, 2007 at 09:37 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts




Some people would argue that original does make it better. (yes I know there's plenty on this Forum who would argue the direct opposite) You act like you made some brilliant prediction "knowing" that someone would point out the correct configuration. Wow, who didn't see that coming? Regardless of all the newbies here, we are still talking about Corvettes, right?
Sorry I'm a "purist" (wow, never heard anyone say that like it's a bad thing) who isn't interested in hacking up a stock car.
Last edited by vettebuyer6369; Jul 16, 2007 at 12:06 AM.




You also need to buy about $25 in screws and nuts to install them. (for some reason the screws come in a full set ($5-ish) but the nuts come in one side only so you need 2. ($10 each)





Some people would argue that original does make it better. (yes I know there's plenty on this Forum who would argue the direct opposite) You act like you made some brilliant prediction "knowing" that someone would point out the correct configuration. Wow, who didn't see that coming? Regardless of all the newbies here, we are still talking about Corvettes, right?
Sorry I'm a "purist" (wow, never heard anyone say that like it's a bad thing) who isn't interested in hacking up a stock car.
Besides, I knew better than to start cutting on my '69 Tri-power, even though I didn't know why the gills came that way. However, I stand behind my observation that the closed off gill will forever look unfinished in my eyes. That's my story, and I'm sticking with it.
As for an explanation, we have to thank bj1k for that, but now I'm left wondering how aftermarket 'glass with all 4 gills cut out evidently get around that bonding strip placement.
Bottom line is we're both right, and now that we've both gotten defensive about the dfiferent perspectives from which we view things, I suggest that we should both have a cold one and lighten up because, afterall, we are talking about Corvettes.
I've owned several '69's and all had the 4th gill painted black. Sometimes this is missed by unknowing body shops when they repaint the car and mistakenly viewed as an uncut gill.
When the gill is painted black it is virtually undetectable from the other 3 cutout gills unless you're closer than one foot from it.
Best,
Greg
It's a step of the front fender bonding process on the 68-69. I looked at the area closely when I was redoing my front clip. It needs to be sealed up from the outside elements. In my case, my car has a/c and the driverside footwell vent is deleted.Bryan
There a cowl bonding area behind each of the fakes.




















